Talking Footy

Kindly do not lie. The Bulldogs issue was a serious cover up because the victims complained bitterly to the media. The St.Kilda issue was completely different as nothing serious happened and there were no complaints by the victims.

I stand by what I said and I suggest you get your head out of that hole in the ground that you have it in right now, and understand that RL has a culture of disgusting behaviour and AFL does not. Odd issues do not a culture make.

my my what an utter disgrace the AFL & its disgusting players are

wheres that carpet ?

sweep sweep ...................

Topper wrote:

Kindly do not lie. The Bulldogs issue was a serious cover up because the victims complained bitterly to the media. The St.Kilda issue was completely different as nothing serious happened and there were no complaints by the victims.

I stand by what I said and I suggest you get your head out of that hole in the ground that you have it in right now, and understand that RL has a culture of disgusting behaviour and AFL does not. Odd issues do not a culture make.

How they can even compare the two is ridiculous. I'm with you on what you've said here. Bulldogs and Sharks cover up in the NRL.

Nothing serious with grounds for complaint in the AFL.

Went by the Canterbury club...what a joke of a place.

Beaussie wrote:

Topper wrote:

Kindly do not lie. The Bulldogs issue was a serious cover up because the victims complained bitterly to the media. The St.Kilda issue was completely different as nothing serious happened and there were no complaints by the victims.

I stand by what I said and I suggest you get your head out of that hole in the ground that you have it in right now, and understand that RL has a culture of disgusting behaviour and AFL does not. Odd issues do not a culture make.

How they can even compare the two is ridiculous. I'm with you on what you've said here. Bulldogs and Sharks cover up in the NRL.

Nothing serious with grounds for complaint in the AFL.

Dogs I commend your respectable and honest approach in this thread, although I do like a bit of banter on the disgraces of each code it is clear that both have a fair bit of trash in the closet.

Wasnt Sydney's fav son micky oloughlin involved in some rape allegation in adeliade some years ago?? What happened with that one beaussie? Sweep sweep?

For your information King-Coward, Michael O'Loughlin was not involved in any rape allegation, it was his brother Ricky that was being mentioned and the Police found there was no case to answer. The person who made the allegations was a daughter of a bikie. So how did the Bulldogs rape mater go not further? A bit of hush money by the NRL to the female vicitm?

AFL Warrior wrote:

For your information King-Coward, Michael O'Loughlin was not involved in any rape allegation, it was his brother Ricky that was being mentioned and the Police found there was no case to answer. The person who made the allegations was a daughter of a bikie. So how did the Bulldogs rape mater go not further? A bit of hush money by the NRL to the female vicitm?

rubbish

it was Michael O'Loughlin & 2 other AFL players .. accused of raping a women
the police didn't proceed with the investigation because the women refused to co-operate .... because... apparently all 3 paid her cash not to

a culture to despise ............

Beaussie wrote:

Topper wrote:

Kindly do not lie. The Bulldogs issue was a serious cover up because the victims complained bitterly to the media. The St.Kilda issue was completely different as nothing serious happened and there were no complaints by the victims.

I stand by what I said and I suggest you get your head out of that hole in the ground that you have it in right now, and understand that RL has a culture of disgusting behaviour and AFL does not. Odd issues do not a culture make.

How they can even compare the two is ridiculous. I'm with you on what you've said here. Bulldogs and Sharks cover up in the NRL.

Nothing serious with grounds for complaint in the AFL.

How about we let the AFL CEO explain it how the two are compared beaussie:
THE AFL's chief executive has admitted sex assaults on women by footy players were covered up in the past, in the wake of pack rape charges.

I stand by what I said too Topper, the AFL just does a better job of controlling the mess that goes to the media. And again, both codes have a crap load of disgrace in the closest, so there is no winners here.

And do you NRL apologists for RAPISTS care to name the Cronulla players who raped that INNOCENT female in NZ? Care to also name the Bulldogs players who RAPED that lady in Coffs?

AFL Warrior wrote:

And do you NRL apologists for RAPISTS care to name the Cronulla players who raped that INNOCENT female in NZ? Care to also name the Bulldogs players who RAPED that lady in Coffs?

What are you dribbling now dumbo? Deneatarse did not apologise he admitted it happened

You truly are dumb Dogs, go back to sniffing butts loser.

AFL Warrior wrote:

And do you NRL apologists for RAPISTS care to name the Cronulla players who raped that INNOCENT female in NZ? Care to also name the Bulldogs players who RAPED that lady in Coffs?

did O laughlin ?

or the other 40 odd AFL players have haved raped girls

just because the Police & AFL cover it up
doesn't mean it didn't happen .............

There is no AFL player called O Laughlin! Stop trying to make things up

Micky O they call him here in Sydney. Fantastic player and generally thought of as a decent chap. But can we be sure with all the sweep sweepin goin on?

Oh Micky O the Native. Well he is innocent as our Native AFL boys behave themselves unlike those NRL Native types.