Talking Footy

Beaussie wrote:

Membership continues to grow. Now 1,849 after just the second week of membership sales. Well done Giants.

after 5 weeks on sale , they've hit 2K

Your lack of comprehension is astounding, King-Eliagh. You commented and addressed a point. That's presenting an argument. Blind Freddy would see this and recognise your folly in trying to avoid the point.

If you wish to comment without presenting an argument, remove yourself from the gene pool because it's impossible.

Again I state you're idea of presenting an argument is on a much lower level than mine. Hence my beating you into a pulp time and time again when I do decide to present an argument in here which is contrary to your belief.

I was presenting comments and questions, not presenting an argument. Your comprehension is getting lower and lower Topper me boy. Especially that last sentence, dear oh dear oh me, have some class about you for gods sake. Presenting an argument requires thought, structure and detail. A comment is not presenting an argument you silly flip.

Comments and questions = presenting an argument. Basic comprehension of which you are constantly failing. Remedial education seems to be a requirement in your ivory tower.

Topper wrote:

Comments and questions = presenting an argument.

Does anyone apart from that neanderthal AFL Warrior actually agree with this?

Comon put your hands up those who agree and please explain why. Particularly the reference to "questions" as "arguments". I doubt Aristotle could pull this off

The man in the street agrees with me.

The man in the street! You are too funny but...Ok you're pulling my leg in this arent you? Just acting soooo stupid to see if I am gullible enough to fall for it. Well I'm not, now cut it out right now Topper!

No I'm not pulling your leg. You are so incredibly foolish you just won't see the truth will you? But what can one expect from someone who lives in an ivory tower.

Who's the man in the street? Was he feeding pigeons with his pants around his ankles?

King-Eliagh wrote:

I havent argued anything in this thread

Yes , Argument as in logical debate is seemingly beyond you.

King-Eliagh wrote:

But for the moment, you could not say GWS is a worry or threat to RL in the west

That's like saying the H bomb isn't dangerous because it hasn't been fired.

But really, you are so insecure or dislike the Australian game so much that you measure every in terms of rl.
This is all about establishing a second AFL side in Sydney so there is AFL every week in Sydney.
It's all about supplying more AFL for TV consumption but more importantly it's about giving the people of WS an AFL team.

The biggest threat to rl is the code itself. The fact only two nrl sides made a profit, that nrl sides are sill tied by the apron strings to their leagues clubs despite many overtures that the pokie tax was coming in, Murdoch's incestuous involment, Channel Nine's finacial troubles and nrl's expasion follies doesn't sit well for the future.

cos789 wrote:

The fact only two nrl sides made a profit, that nrl sides are sill tied by the apron strings to their leagues clubs despite many overtures that the pokie tax was coming in, Murdoch's incestuous involment, Channel Nine's finacial troubles and nrl's expasion follies doesn't sit well for the future.

I thought it was only one after recent reports in the media that 15 of the 16 NRL clubs run at a loss.

cos789 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

I havent argued anything in this thread

Yes , Argument as in logical debate is seemingly beyond you.

King-Eliagh wrote:

But for the moment, you could not say GWS is a worry or threat to RL in the west

That's like saying the H bomb isn't dangerous because it hasn't been fired.

But really, you are so insecure or dislike the Australian game so much that you measure every in terms of rl.
This is all about establishing a second AFL side in Sydney so there is AFL every week in Sydney.
It's all about supplying more AFL for TV consumption but more importantly it's about giving the people of WS an AFL team.

The biggest threat to rl is the code itself. The fact only two nrl sides made a profit, that nrl sides are sill tied by the apron strings to their leagues clubs despite many overtures that the pokie tax was coming in, Murdoch's incestuous involment, Channel Nine's finacial troubles and nrl's expasion follies doesn't sit well for the future.

Ahh cos? Wipe that brown dribble running down your chin.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Topper wrote:

Comments and questions = presenting an argument.

Does anyone apart from that neanderthal AFL Warrior actually agree with this?

Comon put your hands up those who agree and please explain why. Particularly the reference to "questions" as "arguments". I doubt Aristotle could pull this off

Still waiting on one of our members to agree with you here Topper me lad.

Sign that man on the street up! He sounds like a hoot :_<>

The man in the street is a legal term for "every normal person". So if no one in here is agreeing, I guess we have no normal people here aside from my good self.