Talking Footy

Aus vicky kicky

FFS can't you say something that has some semblance of meaning ?
Are you a child.
Are you on that home brew ?
I know it was your down fall at BF!

Burps don't count as valid objections.

cos789 wrote:

FFS can't you say something that has some semblance of meaning ?
Are you a child.
Are you on that home brew ?
I know it was your down fall at BF!

Looked in any windows lately mr peeping tom?

Topper wrote:

Burps don't count as valid objections.

A burp has more meaning.

True!

cos789 wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Lets stick to the official ABS stats.

268,700 players for Australian Rules

91,200 players for Rugby League

Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.

They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.

Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?

That's another example of their lying culture altering figures, Beaussie.

Beaussie wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Lets stick to the official ABS stats.

268,700 players for Australian Rules

91,200 players for Rugby League

Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.

They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.

Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?

And you lot would claim they are not correct
they are made up
the NRL are behind them
its a conspiracy
they aren't correct as regional WA & SA .. & tassie aren't included

just a whole lotta ....

similar to the ranting feet stamping tanty going on now from you lot... with TV ratings that have been collated by a reputable independant gatherer of TV ratings with no agenda ... just provding info as they are supposed to.. for broadcasters & advertisers so they know where the value is

K

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.

They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.

Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?

. with TV ratings that have been collated by a reputable independant gatherer of TV ratings with no agenda ... just provding info as they are supposed to.. for broadcasters & advertisers so they know where the value is

I think we can all agree that the ABS is reputable, independant and has no agenda.

We are not disputing Oztam figures ven though Nielson says they are seriously flawed.
Oztam says AFL wins.
We are not disputing that broadcasters know the real situation. AFL currently recieves double NRL.
We dispute fiddling with the Oztam figures.

cos789 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.

Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?

. with TV ratings that have been collated by a reputable independant gatherer of TV ratings with no agenda ... just provding info as they are supposed to.. for broadcasters & advertisers so they know where the value is

I think we can all agree that the ABS is reputable, independant and has no agenda.

We are not disputing Oztam figures ven though Nielson says they are seriously flawed.
Oztam says AFL wins.
We are not disputing that broadcasters know the real situation. AFL currently recieves double NRL.
We dispute fiddling with the Oztam figures.

anything that says the AFL wins isn't disputed by you lot
anything that says anything else ..... is

the AFL & NRL will receive about the same by July of this year
as they should
finally laying to rest all the pages of garbage posted by derpball wally's like yourself on the subject of how accurate the ratings system is ... & I mean all of it

K

Beaussie wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Lets stick to the official ABS stats.

268,700 players for Australian Rules

91,200 players for Rugby League

Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.

They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.

Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?

Despearate enough to bring up the ratings debate on every frigging thread.

cos789 wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.

They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.

Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?

Despearate enough to bring up the ratings debate on every frigging thread.

BINGO!!!

Amazing how every thread turns into TV ratings and the regional or cumulative figures are mentioned.

I'd love to know why they ignore the 5city ratings when they are counted equally for both codes!

Because it shows the truth of course!

Heh, parafeel you've been ignoring this thread.