



Looked in any windows lately mr peeping tom?cos789 wrote:FFS can't you say something that has some semblance of meaning ?
Are you a child.
Are you on that home brew ?
I know it was your down fall at BF!
A burp has more meaning.Topper wrote:Burps don't count as valid objections.
They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.cos789 wrote:Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.Beaussie wrote:Lets stick to the official ABS stats.
268,700 players for Australian Rules
91,200 players for Rugby League
Beaussie wrote:They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.cos789 wrote:Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.Beaussie wrote:Lets stick to the official ABS stats.
268,700 players for Australian Rules
91,200 players for Rugby League![]()
Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?
I think we can all agree that the ABS is reputable, independant and has no agenda.Raiderdave wrote:. with TV ratings that have been collated by a reputable independant gatherer of TV ratings with no agenda ... just provding info as they are supposed to.. for broadcasters & advertisers so they know where the value isBeaussie wrote:They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.cos789 wrote:Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.![]()
Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?
cos789 wrote:I think we can all agree that the ABS is reputable, independant and has no agenda.Raiderdave wrote:. with TV ratings that have been collated by a reputable independant gatherer of TV ratings with no agenda ... just provding info as they are supposed to.. for broadcasters & advertisers so they know where the value isBeaussie wrote:They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.![]()
Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?
We are not disputing Oztam figures ven though Nielson says they are seriously flawed.
Oztam says AFL wins.
We are not disputing that broadcasters know the real situation. AFL currently recieves double NRL.
We dispute fiddling with the Oztam figures.
Despearate enough to bring up the ratings debate on every frigging thread.Beaussie wrote:They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.cos789 wrote:Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.Beaussie wrote:Lets stick to the official ABS stats.
268,700 players for Australian Rules
91,200 players for Rugby League![]()
Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?
BINGO!!!cos789 wrote:Despearate enough to bring up the ratings debate on every frigging thread.Beaussie wrote:They always seem to struggle with facts sourced from independent and respected aurthorities. You can bet you life on it if the ABS has the figures reversed they would use them as a source.cos789 wrote:Yet another thread where our rl friends don't accept figures from an independant respected government authourity.![]()
Gotta love how they talk of trying to include Touch Football or OzTag participant numbers. How desperate are they?