Page 3 of 3

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:56 pm
by crocodileman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Beaussie you sound like Clancy Wiggum from the Simpsons. I'd have to suggest you're also as incompetent :lol:


AFL Indescretions 2011=26 - NRL=4! Thanks for the stats Raider.

Time to 'move on' and accept the fact that the AFL boys are acting more like bogan criminals than the NRL boys this season eh Beaussie :wink:
Yes I can see the resemblance between Chief Wiggum and our beloved Beaussie!!

Some of the incompetence displayed in managing this site takes on epic proportions of late.

At least Beaussie will be able to comfort himself (in every sense!) when the Swannies win tonight!

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:16 pm
by Dogs
Innocent until proven guilty, however interesting the comment from a melbournite about him having a history of this behaviour and this was also noted seperately in the Advertiser SA paper as well. One to keep our eye on for your count KE
http://www.foxsports.com.au/AFL/adelaid ... 6140408224

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:48 pm
by kaskill
How does being assaulted by some dero in south aus count as an AFL disgace dogs? #-o

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:55 pm
by Dogs
kaskill wrote:
How does being assaulted by some dero in south aus count as an AFL disgace dogs? #-o
Did you read what I put up, I said innocent until proven guilty, however one to keep our eye on as it appears he has a history from 2 different sources

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:57 pm
by Grim Reaper
Who cares, its only a pathetic Cows player....

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:52 am
by Raiderdave
Grim Reaper wrote:
Who cares, its only a pathetic Cows player....
He plays for the North Qld Cowboys does he ? 8-[

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:25 am
by Beaussie
kaskill wrote:
How does being assaulted by some dero in south aus count as an AFL disgace dogs? #-o
Pathetic isn't it. :roll:

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:18 pm
by King-Eliagh
Dogs wrote:
Innocent until proven guilty, however interesting the comment from a melbournite about him having a history of this behaviour and this was also noted seperately in the Advertiser SA paper as well. One to keep our eye on for your count KE
http://www.foxsports.com.au/AFL/adelaid ... 6140408224
tidy work Dogs and yes I'll keep an eye out for this dodgy looking character. The look of the scrawny jerk and the fact he's been done before says it all really. And judging by his lack of physique, I'm not surprised he got punched out :lol:

At this point I'll count this as a half a disgrace as we dont know all the details. If it was a fight, he obviously didnt have the nouse or wish to avoid it, otherwise he would've.

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:50 pm
by Raiderdave
King-Eliagh wrote:
Dogs wrote:
Innocent until proven guilty, however interesting the comment from a melbournite about him having a history of this behaviour and this was also noted seperately in the Advertiser SA paper as well. One to keep our eye on for your count KE
http://www.foxsports.com.au/AFL/adelaid ... 6140408224
tidy work Dogs and yes I'll keep an eye out for this dodgy looking character. The look of the scrawny jerk and the fact he's been done before says it all really. And judging by his lack of physique, I'm not surprised he got punched out :lol:

At this point I'll count this as a half a disgrace as we dont know all the details. If it was a fight, he obviously didnt have the nouse or wish to avoid it, otherwise he would've.



like many an AFL player E

getting their ability & their ambition mixed up :wink: