eelofwest wrote:Xman wrote:Quick recap for you: the NRL had 7-8 exclusive broadcasts per round over a longer season, a far shorter broadcast for better averaging, and SOO thrown in, which resulted in the NRL media claiming some bogus victory in a meaningless cumulative ratings.enarelle wrote:Quick recap. For last season the NRL finished 10m viewers up on the OZ numbers and 22m up when you included the full NRL competition.
So has the AFL made up the 10m or the 20m? Hope your not relying on the TV ratings posted on this site as they are not even close when it comes to the NRL numbers.
The duration of the game/coverage has nothing to do with popularity as it is the same person watching.having said that the AFL are so dominant this year they will still win this bogus cumulative ratings race, by a fair way too.
The real sign of the most popular sport on TV is an apples v apples comparison like the finals series provides, where games a all exclusive, at a similar time, and of interest to a similar sized homeland market. The AFL have smashed it wide open.
Lol what a load of garbage again from you........![]()
Apples vs Apples the NRL wins and easy.
Foxtell numbers have the NRL winning easy with a average of 280k during the regular season, the AFL is at 190k or there abouts.
FTA average for the regular season has NRL winning easy with over a million viewers for every match on 9.
You can have your game broadcasts on Fox, Speed, ESPN for all i care but when you compare apples v apples the NRL wins and easy.

All AFL foxtel ratings are split with concurrent games.
The AFL finals arent and have been getting a total audience between 1.5m and 1.92m. The NRL are lower by a substantial margin.