Page 20 of 185

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:38 pm
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
The Roar:
Stopped reading there. Nothing balance or fair regarding the AFL ever gets published on that NRL loving site.
I see League won the ratings, even withot regional viewers, on Friday night.......sign of things to come.


Did you read those figures?

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:44 pm
by Raiderdave
pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
The Roar:
Stopped reading there. Nothing balance or fair regarding the AFL ever gets published on that NRL loving site.
I see League won the ratings, even withot regional viewers, on Friday night.......sign of things to come.


Did you read those figures?
I did
652K for the NRL
588K for the AFL

Metro figures only :shock:

imagine adding the regionals to that , & what are we left with
carnage
sheer carnage :cool:

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:02 pm
by TLPG
The Roar is not reliable.

The End

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:11 pm
by Raiderdave
TLPG wrote:
The Roar is not reliable.

The End
my figures aren't from the roar

they're from

umm

This Site !! 8-[ :wink:

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:24 pm
by TLPG
I wasn't talking to you.

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 3:10 pm
by pussycat
TLPG wrote:
The Roar is not reliable.

The End

When has the Roar ever done ratings figures?

Is there anything that cast's the AFL in a bad light thats reliable?

NB. Maybe you should close this thread down too because the AFL is starting yo get a real arse kicking in this one :wink:

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 3:34 pm
by Raiderdave
pussycat wrote:
TLPG wrote:
The Roar is not reliable.

The End

When has the Roar ever done ratings figures?

Is there anything that cast's the AFL in a bad light thats reliable?

NB. Maybe you should close this thread down too because the AFL is starting yo get a real arse kicking in this one :wink:
well thats all it will take :wink:

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:39 am
by TLPG
Exactly, Hammer.

Edit: Raider is not to accuse me of multiple voting again if he doesn't want to get into serious trouble. I have one vote in the poll and that's all. End of subject.

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 5:14 pm
by Raiderdave
TLPG wrote:
Exactly, Hammer.

Edit: Raider is not to accuse me of multiple voting again if he doesn't want to get into serious trouble. I have one vote in the poll and that's all. End of subject.
geezzz
sense of humor much 8-[ :_<> :(/

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 5:21 pm
by TLPG
It's slander and that's one of the reasons for the "Enough" sticky. It's nothing to laugh at - at all. I said end of subject and any reply will be deleted. Move back to the topic.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:55 am
by Beaussie
pussycat wrote:
TLPG wrote:
The Roar is not reliable.

The End

When has the Roar ever done ratings figures?

Is there anything that cast's the AFL in a bad light thats reliable?
They may not cover ratings specifically but from what I've read there, there is definately an NRL bias in the articles presented, particularly when ratings and tv rights of the NRL and AFL are mentioned.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:05 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
TLPG wrote:
The Roar is not reliable.

The End

When has the Roar ever done ratings figures?

Is there anything that cast's the AFL in a bad light thats reliable?
They may not cover ratings specifically but from what I've read there, there is definately an NRL bias in the articles presented, particularly when ratings and tv rights of the NRL and AFL are mentioned.
its only bias when the AFL is behind in the ratings
& gospel then they're not eh Beaussie ? :roll: :roll: :roll:

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 5:11 pm
by TLPG
Ridiculous remark not worthy of comment.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:51 pm
by pussycat
TLPG wrote:
Exactly, Hammer.

Edit: Raider is not to accuse me of multiple voting again if he doesn't want to get into serious trouble. I have one vote in the poll and that's all. End of subject.
C'mon, this is an AFL site.... what do you expect?

Besides if the NRL got ahead the the poll results would get 'mysteriously' lost like they were last time.

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:02 pm
by TLPG
One instance does not make a case for that argument, Pussycat.