Talking Footy

NRLCrap1 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

here you go, I FOUND THE AFL CROWD RECORD IN THE STATES for non-exhibition games:

1,000 (2004). (Mid American Australian Football League). Nashville Kangaroos vs Chicago Swans – Nashville, Tennessee. (source MAAFL)

great work guys! let's play catch, oh wait....we cant.

fumble fumble fumble, perpetually confined to 3 backward states due to a shithouse game no one will like unless they are brought up with it and shunned if they dont.

1,000 is an excellent crowd for the US! Bet there are plenty in the 900's! But of course in your massive state of denial you can bring yourself to admit that can you? Here's a fun fact - I'll bet that many local rugby league games in regional NSW struggle to pull 1,000 outside of finals!! Explain THAT!!

do you have any fucking comprehension skills at all/

this is a discussion on crowds in OTHER countries.
I know you fumbletards think the world ends at the Victorian border ,but you should realise that crowds in NSW do not count as international.

I swear a few brain cells die everytime I read one of your inane,mostly wrong as well as delusional posts.

You're talking about crowds being the be all and end all in strength. I proved that to be a fallacy from RL HEARTLAND!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Then why are you preaching crowds and ignoring playing numbers that have been given? All you can do is laugh at it without being able to prove them wrong! Stuff the crowds in developing areas. Playing numbers are what counts and that's a fricking FACT!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

No, that's the NRL who tell whoppers about figures. AFL figures are accurate.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Then why are you preaching crowds and ignoring playing numbers that have been given? All you can do is laugh at it without being able to prove them wrong! Stuff the crowds in developing areas. Playing numbers are what counts and that's a fricking FACT!!

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

you're so predictable i already said what you were gonna say in that post you quoted, "in before you make fun of the brevity of it."

Yet, RLWC is averaging the highest it has probably EVER averaged. Including 17k sellouts in france, 45k in wales and what should be a 70k+ sell out in england. How are international AFL crowds? anyone????

! By then I wonder how much more loss in Participation

600K more participants then that Victorian abortion in 2013

I'd say it'll be a Million more by 2017
RL
Australias most played game ...

hows that feelin for ya fumblers

What lunch tag footy? Is that where all your numbers are because you only have 167k registered RL players Australia wide! And 8800 of those play outside NSW/QLD so thats super RD, of no relevance outside NSW/QLD!

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

you're so predictable i already said what you were gonna say in that post you quoted, "in before you make fun of the brevity of it."

Yet, RLWC is averaging the highest it has probably EVER averaged. Including 17k sellouts in france, 45k in wales and what should be a 70k+ sell out in england. How are international AFL crowds? anyone????

! By then I wonder how much more loss in Participation

600K more participants then that Victorian abortion in 2013

I'd say it'll be a Million more by 2017
RL
Australias most played game ...

hows that feelin for ya fumblers

What lunch tag footy? Is that where all your numbers are because you only have 167k registered RL players Australia wide! And 8800 of those play outside NSW/QLD so thats super RD, of no relevance outside NSW/QLD!

registered players ? >

oh ...... no


it was the VFL who invented ............ participants.... fuckhead

& anyone who farts in the same postcode as a sherrin ... is a fumble bumble participant .. aren't they ?

so RL is now doing the same
& handing the VFL its nutz in a cup too

the NRL
beating the VFL at their own game

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Then why are you preaching crowds and ignoring playing numbers that have been given? All you can do is laugh at it without being able to prove them wrong! Stuff the crowds in developing areas. Playing numbers are what counts and that's a fricking FACT!!

because there is photographic evidence of the crowds.

there is jack shit for playing numbers cause they are BULL SHIT. anyone can say 20k in RSA. Here, i'll do it. "there are over 1 million RL players in RSA"

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

here you go, I FOUND THE AFL CROWD RECORD IN THE STATES for non-exhibition games:

1,000 (2004). (Mid American Australian Football League). Nashville Kangaroos vs Chicago Swans – Nashville, Tennessee. (source MAAFL)

great work guys! let's play catch, oh wait....we cant.

fumble fumble fumble, perpetually confined to 3 backward states due to a shithouse game no one will like unless they are brought up with it and shunned if they dont.

1,000 is an excellent crowd for the US! Bet there are plenty in the 900's! But of course in your massive state of denial you can bring yourself to admit that can you? Here's a fun fact - I'll bet that many local rugby league games in regional NSW struggle to pull 1,000 outside of finals!! Explain THAT!!

We got 7.3k to USA vs Canada.

but no, go and feel great about getting 1,000 to a game.

- I'm a bit sick of it - !

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Then why are you preaching crowds and ignoring playing numbers that have been given? All you can do is laugh at it without being able to prove them wrong! Stuff the crowds in developing areas. Playing numbers are what counts and that's a fricking FACT!!

because there is photographic evidence of the crowds.

there is jack shit for playing numbers cause they are BULL SHIT. anyone can say 20k in RSA. Here, i'll do it. "there are over 1 million RL players in RSA"

There are 20K playing in South Africa. Fricking live with it, Fyiar. Photographic evidence means zero because it's inherently limited in scope.

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

here you go, I FOUND THE AFL CROWD RECORD IN THE STATES for non-exhibition games:

1,000 (2004). (Mid American Australian Football League). Nashville Kangaroos vs Chicago Swans – Nashville, Tennessee. (source MAAFL)

great work guys! let's play catch, oh wait....we cant.

fumble fumble fumble, perpetually confined to 3 backward states due to a shithouse game no one will like unless they are brought up with it and shunned if they dont.

1,000 is an excellent crowd for the US! Bet there are plenty in the 900's! But of course in your massive state of denial you can bring yourself to admit that can you? Here's a fun fact - I'll bet that many local rugby league games in regional NSW struggle to pull 1,000 outside of finals!! Explain THAT!!

We got 7.3k to USA vs Canada.

but no, go and feel great about getting 1,000 to a game.

- I'm a bit sick of it - !

well fuck off then
see ya , wouldn't wanna be ya ..............cockhead

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Then why are you preaching crowds and ignoring playing numbers that have been given? All you can do is laugh at it without being able to prove them wrong! Stuff the crowds in developing areas. Playing numbers are what counts and that's a fricking FACT!!

because there is photographic evidence of the crowds.

there is jack shit for playing numbers cause they are BULL SHIT. anyone can say 20k in RSA. Here, i'll do it. "there are over 1 million RL players in RSA"

There are 20K playing in South Africa. Fricking live with it, Fyiar. Photographic evidence means zero because it's inherently limited in scope.

:_<> :_<> :_<>

sure there are cockhead

& they all ride to games on unicorns
:_<> :_<> :_<>

the VFL & their fucking lies