Talking Footy

Another week in AFL land, where dragons roam the earth with there butterflywings

Cant wait to see the final result. You know when all the "polling booths' are counted. Problem is that doesn't seem to happen on this site.

This result achieved despite no melbourne team and the game not starting till twenty till nine on the east coast.. Even if you put in the bodgey regional equation your a long way behind. What about that foxtel result 2nd biggest of the year.AFL now 1 and 2. Don't worry it's only another 5 years.

pookus wrote:

This result achieved despite no melbourne team and the game not starting till twenty till nine on the east coast.. Even if you put in the bodgey regional equation your a long way behind. What about that foxtel result 2nd biggest of the year.AFL now 1 and 2. Don't worry it's only another 5 years.

:_<>

Circular argument but "dodgy regional figure." How lame are you lot. Dont count the other 7m cause we will lose again. Claim your "win" but it will have no relevance when the independents produce the actual results in November.

enarelle wrote:

Circular argument but "dodgy regional figure." How lame are you lot. Dont count the other 7m cause we will lose again. Claim your "win" but it will have no relevance when the independents produce the actual results in November.

The AFL still wins when regionals are included. If the ratings were shown as peak instead of average it would be a slaughter!

Sat TV #NRL #NRLSOUCAN 767,000 (Syd 482k Mel 23k Bri 242k Ade 5k Per 15k) Nine/GEM

Sat TV #AFL #AFLPiesEagles 1,148,000 (Syd 47k Mel 590k Bri 56k Ade 167k Per 288k) Seven/7mate


like for like both starting at 7.30pm easy victory for AFL. Put on your tin hats its all you have to argue against the AFL results. Should be low to mid 400s for fox.

piesman2011 wrote:

Sat TV #NRL #NRLSOUCAN 767,000 (Syd 482k Mel 23k Bri 242k Ade 5k Per 15k) Nine/GEM

Sat TV #AFL #AFLPiesEagles 1,148,000 (Syd 47k Mel 590k Bri 56k Ade 167k Per 288k) Seven/7mate


like for like both starting at 7.30pm easy victory for AFL. Put on your tin hats its all you have to argue against the AFL results. Should be low to mid 400s for fox.

But with their 800k regionals and our zero regionals, and all the double counting with fox and FTA, and ......they'll still claim victory.

Sat Sub TV #AFL #AFLPiesEagles 422,000 #FoxFooty (New AFL STV record via @RyanNorthover)


Looks like another record for this year on fox. I havent seen Pussys updated subscription numbers this year. Maybe this would help:

1. AFL PiesEagles 422K
2. AFL hawksPies 417K
3. AFL ?

I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night

almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.

Seems our Nrl friends have had enough of the fight club. Only time we hear from them is to tell us oztam,repucom and media week have teamed up with the AFL to try and complete world domination.What are we going to do today brain,we're gonna take over the world pinky,

piesman2011 wrote:

I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night

almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.

The AFL has near to 3/4 0f a million more metropolitan viewers this week, than it had at the same last year . You'll have to excuse me if I sound a little sceptical

pussycat wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night

almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.

The AFL has near to 3/4 0f a million more metropolitan viewers this week, than it had at the same last year . You'll have to excuse me if I sound a little sceptical

No Collingwood last year in the semifinals and Adelaide and Freo was a perfect match up with both games being close unlike the RL games which have been very one sided all finals.

pussycat wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night

almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.

The AFL has near to 3/4 0f a million more metropolitan viewers this week, than it had at the same last year . You'll have to excuse me if I sound a little sceptical

So your comparing this season with foxtel and regionals to last season with metro FTA figures only?

Nice one

Even without foxtel we still smashed you despite a telecast that goes 50% longer. =D>

How's your NRL v AFL ratings list going? :D

pussycat wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night

almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.

The AFL has near to 3/4 0f a million more metropolitan viewers this week, than it had at the same last year . You'll have to excuse me if I sound a little sceptical

I think you need to take your argument to media week there the ones putting out the numbers.Tweeted to my pocket on this very morning.I think you need to get on to them and call shananigans. :D :D