
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
:_<>pookus wrote:This result achieved despite no melbourne team and the game not starting till twenty till nine on the east coast.. Even if you put in the bodgey regional equation your a long way behind. What about that foxtel result 2nd biggest of the year.AFL now 1 and 2. Don't worry it's only another 5 years.
The AFL still wins when regionals are included. If the ratings were shown as peak instead of average it would be a slaughter!enarelle wrote:Circular argument but "dodgy regional figure." How lame are you lot. Dont count the other 7m cause we will lose again. Claim your "win" but it will have no relevance when the independents produce the actual results in November.
But with their 800k regionals and our zero regionals, and all the double counting with fox and FTA, and ......they'll still claim victory.piesman2011 wrote:Sat TV #NRL #NRLSOUCAN 767,000 (Syd 482k Mel 23k Bri 242k Ade 5k Per 15k) Nine/GEM
Sat TV #AFL #AFLPiesEagles 1,148,000 (Syd 47k Mel 590k Bri 56k Ade 167k Per 288k) Seven/7mate
like for like both starting at 7.30pm easy victory for AFL. Put on your tin hats its all you have to argue against the AFL results. Should be low to mid 400s for fox.
piesman2011 wrote:I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night
almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.
pussycat wrote:piesman2011 wrote:I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night
almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.
The AFL has near to 3/4 0f a million more metropolitan viewers this week, than it had at the same last year![]()
![]()
. You'll have to excuse me if I sound a little sceptical
![]()
![]()
So your comparing this season with foxtel and regionals to last season with metro FTA figures only?pussycat wrote:piesman2011 wrote:I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night
almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.
The AFL has near to 3/4 0f a million more metropolitan viewers this week, than it had at the same last year![]()
![]()
. You'll have to excuse me if I sound a little sceptical
![]()
![]()
I think you need to take your argument to media week there the ones putting out the numbers.Tweeted to my pocket on this very morning.I think you need to get on to them and call shananigans. :D :Dpussycat wrote:piesman2011 wrote:I have estimated that the :
AFL would have had a total of 1.95 million viewers last night while the
NRL would have had a total of 1.28 million viewers last night
almost 700,000 more viewers watching AFL.
The AFL has near to 3/4 0f a million more metropolitan viewers this week, than it had at the same last year![]()
![]()
. You'll have to excuse me if I sound a little sceptical
![]()
![]()