Page 183 of 852
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:04 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:pussycat wrote:
Where still waiting to hear about the unexplained(unexplainable) 300 000

Increased interest and increased availability due to better TV coverage. You should try it sometime. Oh wait, you took the cash.
:
there it is again .... the funniest sh.it you'll read anywhere
the VFL Grand Final are keeping with their theme of crowd & TV ratings Hans Cristian Andersen novels
.... performers include
the Tooth Fairy
Santa Claus
the Big Bad wolf
goldy locks
& the Easter Bunny
dumbest sports fans on the planet

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:42 pm
by Xman
pussycat wrote:Based soley on last year (not the 4 previous) . Removing regionals for Fox its still over 200 000 or almost 20%!
Consistent live AFL for once, especially in Perth our second biggest market, will do that!

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:44 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:pussycat wrote:
Where still waiting to hear about the unexplained(unexplainable) 300 000

Increased interest and increased availability due to better TV coverage. You should try it sometime. Oh wait, you took the cash.
:
there it is again .... the funniest sh.it you'll read anywhere
the VFL Grand Final are keeping with their theme of crowd & TV ratings Hans Cristian Andersen novels
.... performers include
the Tooth Fairy
Santa Claus
the Big Bad wolf
goldy locks
& the Easter Bunny
dumbest sports fans on the planet

No no no.
The funniest is NRL fans claiming victory in the cummulative ratings victory for years because of foxtel, but now claiming they're rubbish!
Too funny!

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:51 pm
by pussycat
The AFL first round of the final series up 1 miilion aaveraging .25 mill per match.

> [-o<

>
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:09 pm
by eelofwest
The NRL still out rates the AFL these are the numbers that matter, the ones with regional and metro combined.
http://www.thinktv.com.au/SiteMedia/w3s ... 202012.pdf
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:30 pm
by pookus
Noone cares about regionals mate thats why the value of your product in Australia was less.Simple LESS.Money talks and bullshit walks.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:44 pm
by Xman
So the AFL smash you in metro FTA ratings despite similar populations. So you include regionals even though they don't count most of the AFL regional markets, then claim victory. Yet when we include all the ratings from our concurrent telecasts you cry foul!

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:20 pm
by Xman
Ok let's look at this report a bit closer:
The AFLs FN game rated 981k metro from 7.5m people but only 1164k metro and regionals. So the 500k in Tasmania, 1.2m in Vic, 250k in SA and 700k in WA could only manage 183k
How are we to believe that metro rates at 13% but the 2.7M regional audience only rated at 6.7%

And this assumes that not 1 single person watches the AFL in regional NSW/QlD, which we know is rubbish.
I call BS

Clearly huge parts of the regional audience aren't included and when these are added they would beat the NRL even without foxtel.
Lastly, the thinktv ratings exclude secondary channels, which the AFL easily outrates the NRL, further showing what bs they are.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:43 pm
by Xman
http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/09/11/AFL ... d-to-head/
Thanks to the co-broadcast deal with Seven and Foxtel/Fox Sports, the AFL was the big winner from the first weekend of finals football in AFL and rugby league. Early data suggests the co-broadcast has boosted total audiences for some games by more than 30% compared with last year when Seven and Ten shared the broadcast rights. It is the first co-broadcast finals after the first co-broadcast home and away season.
It shows what rugby league missed (and what Foxtel and Fox Sports failed to strongly press for) in the recent new broadcast contract by not ending Nine’s three exclusive games and pushing for co-broadcasting with Fox Sports, which retrained its eight games. The NRL and the Commission have missed out on what looks to be a significant boost to audience numbers, judging by the AFL figures.
On top of the extra eyeballs, AFL games are longer, which are better suited to advertising. Now there are more people watching AFL games.
Friday night’s brutish clash that saw Hawthorn account for Collingwood was watched by a total of 1.860 million people across the country on Seven (main and digital channels, 1.455 million) and pay-TV (451,000). It easily eclipsed the 1.447 million people who watched Canterbury beat Manly in the first qualifying final of the NRL in Sydney on Nine (main and digital channels).
Saturday’s second qualifying final (an afternoon game) in which Sydney beat Adelaide was watched by 1.309 million people (975,000 million people on Seven’s main channel and 334,000 on pay-TV). The Geelong/Fremantle first elimination final was watched by 1.169 million people on Seven (main and digital) and 381,000 on pay-TV’s Fox Footy for a total of 1.550 million.
Saturday night’s second NRL qualifying finals on Nine (Melbourne beating South Sydney, a twilight early evening game) was watched by 1.311 million people on Nine and the first elimination final between North Queensland and the Brisbane side (won by North Queensland) was watched by 1.113 million, according to early data. (Some of the figures for the NRL games are clouded by poor coding data for the ratings in regional markets).
The last of the elimination finals saw the Canberra/Cronulla game win out with a total of 1.116 million viewers on Nine (main channels and digital) in metro and regional markets. The West Coast/North Melbourne game averaged 1.057 million viewers, with the pay-TV audience of 334,000 boosting the audience on Seven (main channels and digital, 723,000 in total) by close to half.
Saturday night’s Rugby Championship test between Australia and South Africa from Perth was a poor relation: its national audience was 547,000 people with 354,000 watching on Nine (it was delayed until after the second NRL final) and 193,000 on Fox Sports.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:40 am
by eelofwest
pookus wrote:
Noone cares about regionals mate thats why the value of your product in Australia was less.Simple LESS.Money talks and bullshit walks.
Our deal is not done yet so how is it less?
16 hour 8 game NRL 1.025B + Internet 100m + NZ SKY 100m = anywhere from 1.2b-1.3b
27 hour 9 game AFL 1.250B - 220M for expansion - aproxx 600k less fans to games this year as per Pies = approx 150m loss to the clubs - A lot less then money from the deal then the NRL.
On what basis don't regionals matter Pookus?
Like i said these are the numbers that matter and it shows NRL clearly on top. =D> =D>
http://www.thinktv.com.au/SiteMedia/w3s ... 202012.pdf
The AFL have been on this top 40 list 2 times this year, and the NRL is on it almost every week.
Funny thing about these final series ratings is that NRL has been ratings 900-1200k ratings all year. No wander we got so much cash for a 2 hour product 8 game comp, our product just simply out rates the AFL... =D>
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:54 am
by Xman
eelofwest wrote:pookus wrote:
Noone cares about regionals mate thats why the value of your product in Australia was less.Simple LESS.Money talks and bullshit walks.
Our deal is not done yet so how is it less?
16 hour 8 game NRL 1.025B + Internet 100m + NZ SKY 100m = anywhere from 1.2b-1.3b
27 hour 9 game AFL 1.250B - 220M for expansion - aproxx 600k less fans to games this year as per Pies = approx 150m loss to the clubs - A lot less then money from the deal then the NRL.
On what basis don't regionals matter Pookus?
Like i said these are the numbers that matter and it shows NRL clearly on top. =D> =D>
http://www.thinktv.com.au/SiteMedia/w3s ... 202012.pdf
The AFL have been on this top 40 list 2 times this year, and the NRL is on it almost every week.
Funny thing about these final series ratings is that NRL has been ratings 900-1200k ratings all year. No wander we got so much cash for a 2 hour product 8 game comp, our product just simply out rates the AFL... =D>
Think Tv exclude AFL regionals so if regionals are important why do you believe a report that excludes them?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:34 am
by piesman2011
pussycat wrote:Based soley on last year (not the 4 previous) . Removing regionals for Fox its still over 200 000 or almost 20%!
Its hard to tell how many regionals there are but lets say that there are a total of 200K more metro watches compared with last year. that is 1.165 last year compared to 1.365 this year
1.365 divided by 1.165 X 100 - 100 = 17% increase (Collingwood playing rather then Geelong, which is a much bigger club)
SOO 1 2011 (3.478 million) SOO 1 2012 (3.92 million) = close to 13% increase
No one questioned the SOO numbers. From my memory. Im not really seeing much difference Collingwood is a much bigger club with a lot more supporters compared with Geelong.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:54 am
by piesman2011
Xman wrote:eelofwest wrote:pookus wrote:
Noone cares about regionals mate thats why the value of your product in Australia was less.Simple LESS.Money talks and bullshit walks.
Our deal is not done yet so how is it less?
16 hour 8 game NRL 1.025B + Internet 100m + NZ SKY 100m = anywhere from 1.2b-1.3b
27 hour 9 game AFL 1.250B - 220M for expansion - aproxx 600k less fans to games this year as per Pies = approx 150m loss to the clubs - A lot less then money from the deal then the NRL.
On what basis don't regionals matter Pookus?
Like i said these are the numbers that matter and it shows NRL clearly on top. =D> =D>
http://www.thinktv.com.au/SiteMedia/w3s ... 202012.pdf
The AFL have been on this top 40 list 2 times this year, and the NRL is on it almost every week.
Funny thing about these final series ratings is that NRL has been ratings 900-1200k ratings all year. No wander we got so much cash for a 2 hour product 8 game comp, our product just simply out rates the AFL... =D>
Think Tv exclude AFL regionals so if regionals are important why do you believe a report that excludes them?

The AFL regionals are not huge to begin with however on top of this they are split in Vic/SA/WA/Tas they are on Prime and in NSW/Qld they are on Mate.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:48 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
So the AFL smash you in metro FTA ratings despite similar populations. :
jesus ... you & maths again
the populations are not similar
the metro catchment which includes some regional for our 2 capitals is barely over 7 Million
Sydney 4.7 Million
Brisbane 2.5 Million
the vicky kicky capitals is 8 Million
Melbourne 4.5 Million
Perth 2 Million
Adelaide 1.5 Million
the Vicky Kicky ratings from their 3 cities last Friday was 980K ... or 12%
the ratings from the NRL capitals was 860K .. or nearly 13%
you lot smashed ..... nothing
seriously I know Victorians are the most uneducated in the commonwealth .. but your maths efforts of late marcus are as embarrasing as it gets

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:51 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:eelofwest wrote:pookus wrote:
Noone cares about regionals mate thats why the value of your product in Australia was less.Simple LESS.Money talks and bullshit walks.
Our deal is not done yet so how is it less?
16 hour 8 game NRL 1.025B + Internet 100m + NZ SKY 100m = anywhere from 1.2b-1.3b
27 hour 9 game AFL 1.250B - 220M for expansion - aproxx 600k less fans to games this year as per Pies = approx 150m loss to the clubs - A lot less then money from the deal then the NRL.
On what basis don't regionals matter Pookus?
Like i said these are the numbers that matter and it shows NRL clearly on top. =D> =D>
http://www.thinktv.com.au/SiteMedia/w3s ... 202012.pdf
The AFL have been on this top 40 list 2 times this year, and the NRL is on it almost every week.
Funny thing about these final series ratings is that NRL has been ratings 900-1200k ratings all year. No wander we got so much cash for a 2 hour product 8 game comp, our product just simply out rates the AFL... =D>
Think Tv exclude AFL regionals so if regionals are important why do you believe a report that excludes them?

they do not exclude them at all
they just never make the top 40 shows .. when will the lies stop with you lot
