Talking Footy

The Giants averaged higher crowds than the pathetic arse Raiders on official crowds. Oh how small is the support for your team Raiderdave? A little over 10k average in a finals year?

Stewie wrote:

The Giants averaged higher crowds than the pathetic arse Raiders on official crowds. Oh how small is the support for your team Raiderdave? A little over 10k average in a finals year?

yes , as we all know singletballers have problems with many things , maths being a glaring one

Raiders 11,286
Midgets 8,000

yet the Midgets averaged more .....


numb of Sellouts at home for the Raiders in 2012
1

numb for the midgets ...........







when will the Midgets have their first sellout , bona fide or fudged do we reckon ?

2019 ...
2022

the Raiders will have a dozen in this time

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

The Giants averaged higher crowds than the pathetic arse Raiders on official crowds. Oh how small is the support for your team Raiderdave? A little over 10k average in a finals year?

yes , as we all know singletballers have problems with many things , maths being a glaring one

Raiders 11,286
Midgets 8,000

yet the Midgets averaged more .....


numb of Sellouts at home for the Raiders in 2012
1

numb for the midgets ...........







when will the Midgets have their first sellout , bona fide or fudged do we reckon ?

2019 ...
2022

the Raiders will have a dozen in this time

Number of sellouts for the arse Raiders in the home & away season? ZERO!

Giants average crowds > arse Raiders average crowds.

Deal with it

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

The Giants averaged higher crowds than the pathetic arse Raiders on official crowds. Oh how small is the support for your team Raiderdave? A little over 10k average in a finals year?

yes , as we all know singletballers have problems with many things , maths being a glaring one

Raiders 11,286
Midgets 8,000

yet the Midgets averaged more .....


numb of Sellouts at home for the Raiders in 2012
1

numb for the midgets ...........







when will the Midgets have their first sellout , bona fide or fudged do we reckon ?

2019 ...
2022

the Raiders will have a dozen in this time

Number of sellouts for the arse Raiders in the home & away season? ZERO!


:

and the number for poooooorrrrrrr . oh so poorrrrrt twatelaide in the last 5 years in any form , H&A & finals ..... ?
also
zero

Raiders ..... 2

the profitable Raiders ..... owning the @rse out of their pants pennyless posting losses left right & centre Pork Swordelaide , as well as the ****** midgets
deal with it

The Raiders made a $200,000 loss on a $12 million football budget LOL!

Stewie wrote:

The Raiders made a $200,000 loss on a $12 million football budget LOL!

the Raiders made a 3.4 Million dollar profit out of an overall turnover of 61 Million d head
making them 9.7 Million better off then poooorrrrrrrrt Skintelaide .... in just 2012 alone , christ knows how much better they've done then the bogans from the slums of adelaide in the last 4 years or so

Raiders ..... Killing it =D> =D> =D>

Pooort Poweroutage ...... .. not so much

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

The Raiders made a $200,000 loss on a $12 million football budget LOL!

the Raiders made a 3.4 Million dollar profit out of an overall turnover of 61 Million d head
making them 9.7 Million better off then poooorrrrrrrrt Skintelaide .... in just 2012 alone , christ knows how much better they've done then the bogans from the slums of adelaide in the last 4 years or so

Raiders ..... Killing it =D> =D> =D>

Pooort Poweroutage ...... .. not so much

That's a separate business, why can't you talk about the Raiders football financials? Doesn't look too good on sheet does it?

$200k loss from a $12 budget

I'd rather lose 200k than what your club did aye mr $6.3 Million man?

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

The Raiders made a $200,000 loss on a $12 million football budget LOL!

the Raiders made a 3.4 Million dollar profit out of an overall turnover of 61 Million d head
making them 9.7 Million better off then poooorrrrrrrrt Skintelaide .... in just 2012 alone , christ knows how much better they've done then the bogans from the slums of adelaide in the last 4 years or so

Raiders ..... Killing it =D> =D> =D>

Pooort Poweroutage ...... .. not so much

That's a separate business, why can't you talk about the Raiders football financials? Doesn't look too good on sheet does it?

$200k loss from a $12 budget

nearly 10 mill better off in just one year of operations are the Raiders then yr mob
have a guess at what that amount is ova the last 4 years

25 million ?
30 million ?



do yuz need a business lesson or two from a mob that know how to make money ?

Raiders ..... raking it in

Port Turdelaide ..... ... not so much

A business lesson from a mob that can't make a return from the smallest budget in the nRL? No thank you.

Stewie wrote:

A business lesson from a mob that can't make a return from the smallest budget in the nRL? No thank you.

now now spewie , thats not the way to treat a wealthy club like mine trying to help out a shit stain on yr undies club like yours

6.3 mill..... astounding

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

A business lesson from a mob that can't make a return from the smallest budget in the nRL? No thank you.

now now spewie , thats not the way to treat a wealthy club like mine trying to help out a shit stain on yr undies club like yours

6.3 mill..... astounding

Wow

POWER FAILURE

Friday, December 7, Alberton.

Port's nightmare season went from bad to worse when its operating deficit was revealed as being a whopping $6.3 million before grants.

An The Advertiser investigation found the $4.1 million trading deficit the club initially reported did not include the AFL grant of $1 million for the transition to Adelaide Oval.

Then there was the previously unreported $1.2 million which is understood to have come from the AFL as the club struggled to pay bills.

I wander how many unreported losses there are out in AFL land......

One word.....

WOW............

They are the AFL equalisation funds you moron and the majority of clubs receive them. Unfortunately in SA there is a media bias against Port, so the moronic journos will try and pull out anything they can to try and create a headline, so they remove the equalisation funds from Port's financial result to try and make it look worse than what it is. Go figure.

The article they made about the Crows financial result was a profit, but when you remove the fine they receive from their salary cap cheating they are in the red. The Crapvertiser doesn't bother mentioning that though, as they're pretty much not allowed to write anything anti-Adelaide Crows.

Don't fall for media bias Raiderdave. Like you say... "scanning.. scanning... News Ltd "

Stewie wrote:

They are the AFL equalisation funds you moron and the majority of clubs receive them. Unfortunately in SA there is a media bias against Port, so the moronic journos will try and pull out anything they can to try and create a headline, so they remove the equalisation funds from Port's financial result to try and make it look worse than what it is. Go figure.

The article they made about the Crows financial result was a profit, but when you remove the fine they receive from their salary cap cheating they are in the red. The Crapvertiser doesn't bother mentioning that though, as they're pretty much not allowed to write anything anti-Adelaide Crows.

Don't fall for media bias Raiderdave. Like you say... "scanning.. scanning... News Ltd "

These fools just dont get it Stewie.

The AFL arrange their draw to enhance crowds and ratings so the greatest number of AFL fans get to see the best games. Teams like Collingwood, Essendon and Carlton, and the teams in form, are scheduled more blockbuster games which also means they earn more revenue. To compensate the less popular teams the AFL use an equalisation fund so teams like port arent disadvantaged for less revenue from being scheduled less blockbusters.

Before dopes like Raiderdave claim this is a rort the NRL do the same by scheduling the broncos almost every Friday night irrespective of their form. However their lowly teams like the Raiders are left with 1/3rd of the Broncos revenue with no compensation for their pathetic FTA TV schedule. Now thats a farce

Xman wrote:

Stewie wrote:

They are the AFL equalisation funds you moron and the majority of clubs receive them. Unfortunately in SA there is a media bias against Port, so the moronic journos will try and pull out anything they can to try and create a headline, so they remove the equalisation funds from Port's financial result to try and make it look worse than what it is. Go figure.

The article they made about the Crows financial result was a profit, but when you remove the fine they receive from their salary cap cheating they are in the red. The Crapvertiser doesn't bother mentioning that though, as they're pretty much not allowed to write anything anti-Adelaide Crows.

Don't fall for media bias Raiderdave. Like you say... "scanning.. scanning... News Ltd "

These fools just dont get it Stewie.

The AFL arrange their draw to enhance crowds and ratings so the greatest number of AFL fans get to see the best games. Teams like Collingwood, Essendon and Carlton, and the teams in form, are scheduled more blockbuster games which also means they earn more revenue. To compensate the less popular teams the AFL use an equalisation fund so teams like port arent disadvantaged for less revenue from being scheduled less blockbusters.

Before dopes like Raiderdave claim this is a rort the NRL do the same by scheduling the broncos almost every Friday night irrespective of their form. However their lowly teams like the Raiders are left with 1/3rd of the Broncos revenue with no compensation for their pathetic FTA TV schedule. Now thats a farce

But but buting again i see..................

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/AFL ... 6544762334

POWER FAILURE

Friday, December 7, Alberton.

Port's nightmare season went from bad to worse when its operating deficit was revealed as being a whopping $6.3 million before grants.

An The Advertiser investigation found the $4.1 million trading deficit the club initially reported did not include the AFL grant of $1 million for the transition to Adelaide Oval.

Then there was the previously unreported $1.2 million which is understood to have come from the AFL as the club struggled to pay bills.


Lights out Boys.......