Page 19 of 22
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:07 am
by NSWAFL
Ah by the NRL definition established by Souths, that unticketted crew is suspect. And we have the evidence already that it's just 8,000 at Souths. What about the other 32,000? So in fact by that token there's the evidence that you previously said wasn't competition wide.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:21 am
by Xman
NSWAFL wrote:Ah by the NRL definition established by Souths, that unticketted crew is suspect. And we have the evidence already that it's just 8,000 at Souths. What about the other 32,000? So in fact by that token there's the evidence that you previously said wasn't competition wide.
Problem is the thread topic indicates its NRL wide. If you divide the remaining 30k of unticketted numbers across the other 15 teams the percentage of unticketted members is actually very low. The team in question is the rabbitohs, but that wasn't the accusation or claim. It was the NrL! Therefore, being objective, the claim is false!
Could we have our first BS point?! Could it actually go to Beaussie?

Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:10 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Do you guys buy those funeral packs for your pets when they die as well and bury them in their club colours and coloured shoe boxes sold by the AFL, is that called an eternal life membership?
Bahahahaha.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:23 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Bump^^^^^^
I want an answer to the last question.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:57 pm
by NSWAFL
You're not getting one.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:01 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I take that as a yes then.
AFL, big sponsors of the Ramones lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCBZ6NSf ... re=related
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:08 pm
by cos789
Xman wrote: there is no support for a claim of fudging for the NRL overall.
There is no "widespred" in the thread title. I only have to prove one instance.
There is a clear cut example of the nrl fudging figures.
Xman wrote: However, your claim that the AFL do the same as the Rabbitohs has not been proven either.
And is totally irrelevant.
The AFL has nothing to with the thread title.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:54 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:I take that as a yes then.
No you will not you will take it as a non answer.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:40 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I take that as a usual cowardly answer.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:44 pm
by NSWAFL
No, it was a stupid question that does not deserve an answer as the idea is fanciful and only exists in that apology of a brain of yours.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:04 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yet people sell their belongings to the AFL and or clubs when they die.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:05 pm
by NSWAFL
Bull! Prove it.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:47 am
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Yet people sell their belongings to the AFL and or clubs when they die.
It'll be great when we can put claims like this in the BS file!

Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:26 pm
by NSWAFL
Gee it went quiet all of a sudden didn't it?
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:35 pm
by cos789
Like this game