Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.

but but but

but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.

but but but

but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest

I called it the they both ... did I ?



is English your 2nd language ?

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.

but but but

but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest

This. The nRL have just completely given up on Adelaide now. The interest for poor bogan's rugby just isn't there.

Stewie wrote:

This.

but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest

Typical of a ****** like spewie, the above sentence doesn't even make sense
& his reply to this illegible nonsense

This

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

This.

but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest

Typical of a ****** like spewie, the above sentence doesn't even make sense
& his reply to this illegible nonsense

This

If you were smart enough you would have known what he was meant to say.

You're always fucking up basic English in your ******** posts, but luckily for you we know what you're trying to say and ignore the mistakes.

Stewie wrote:

If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.

but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest [/quote][/quote]


I called it the they both ... did I ? no

, you keep saying rubgy more popular than AFL, yet it cant survive in South Australia and Western Australia,
even news limited is pulling the out on the Strom, who will bail out the stom now? no more free press in the herald sun, no more ticket give aways, no more $ to bail them, out, after conquering the world, still no one cares about the storm, that will be another state where rugby failed
falling interest in crowds and membership in the Broncos. is that people loosing interest in rugby in QLD as well? =D> =D> =D>

The Storm are going to struggle both financially and on field as a result of News pulling out. This could well be disastrous for rugby league in Victoria.

Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.

Stewie wrote:

Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.

I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video store

Xman wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.

I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video store

=D>

13k for the NRL last night, almost half the AFLs GF practice match!

Xman wrote:

13k for the NRL last night, almost half the AFLs GF practice match!

& 33K last night

33% more then a VFL Grand Final ... in a city thats not even considerd a Rugby League town ( Auckland)


NRL.... Killing it

VFL.. hmmmmm , not so much

Xman wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.

I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video store

surely a Grand Final is a blockbuster ?

yet an NRL premiership match ... on a THursday night
attracts more fans at the game then a VFL Grand Final

& about 1 Million more veiwers on TV

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.

I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video store

surely a Grand Final is a blockbuster ?

yet an NRL premiership match ... on a THursday night
attracts more fans at the game

& about 1 Million more veiwers on TV

Here's the difference Dave, no AFL supporter calls the preseason GF a blockbuster.

All the preseason cup is used for is practice games. The swans haven't won a preseason game for years. They play kids. Most other teams do as we'll.

How you've got it in your head that AFL supporters care is beyond me

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

13k for the NRL last night, almost half the AFLs GF practice match!

& 33K last night

33% more then a VFL Grand Final ... in a city thats not even considerd a Rugby League town ( Auckland)


NRL.... Killing it

VFL.. hmmmmm , not so much

one team for a country of 4m =D> =D>

What's their average for a season? They seem to always have a decent first game then their crowds drop to epically low levels.