Page 18 of 18

Re: BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:42 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
No official links, just hearsay from AFL journos.
In your opinion. And we all know how accurate that opinion is.

Re: BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:51 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
9 a side dumbarse.

Re: BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:28 pm
by NSWAFL
Stupid illiterate liar. Evidence, or it's a minimum of 14 and a regular number of 18.

Re: BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:34 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
You put the links in dumbarse.

Re: BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:39 pm
by NSWAFL
No, you made the claim to nine a side. You prove it. No evidence of 9 a side makes my claim correct by default.

Re: BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:26 pm
by cos789
You mods are making a rod for your own back by not stepping in early and clarifying the criteria.
Nowhere has anyone shown that RFL = UK rl.


Image

a RFL game :oops: :oops: :oops:

Image

a RFL game

Re: BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:53 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Could someone translate, the dope above is confused again.