BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:42 pm

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
No official links, just hearsay from AFL journos.

In your opinion. And we all know how accurate that opinion is.

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:51 pm

9 a side dumbarse.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:28 pm

Stupid illiterate liar. Evidence, or it's a minimum of 14 and a regular number of 18.

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:34 pm

You put the links in dumbarse.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:39 pm

No, you made the claim to nine a side. You prove it. No evidence of 9 a side makes my claim correct by default.

cos789 · Post by **cos789** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:26 pm

You mods are making a rod for your own back by not stepping in early and clarifying the criteria.
Nowhere has anyone shown that RFL = UK rl.

a RFL game

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:53 pm

Could someone translate, the dope above is confused again.

Talking Footy