Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

What the hell. How did this end up as a BS file? I posed a question and then stated an opinion followed by another question

Clearly Beaussie never made a claim at all, he stated an opinion, but our adjudicator says...

Xman wrote:

The claimant has fulfilled his requirement and explained his claim, which has merit.

and swiftly provides Beaussie with a best and smartest point. Unfortunately Xman did not bother taking on my advice for this one, which was to end in a no result decision.

Do you actually read the files at all Xman?

He made a statement without qualifying it as his opinion? Ahhh do you read anything Xman? I've bolded what you seem to have missed Mr Objectivity

That's the entire point of the bs file! He never qualified his comment as an opinion until after he was challenged which is too late

So, no result on BS claim right?

No, not in this case, Xman would prefer to throw his master Beaussie a bone.

Oh here we go again.....

SOOKY SOOKY LA LA!!

I'm right eh?

It clearly shoulda been no result.

Beaussie pulled out in his very first post

parafeel has now stated that the RFL is not BARLA so that should make his RFL bs as bs

You can cry all you like sara and you can make any bs file you like.

Just be clear on what you want to say shirt lifter so I don't get ripped off again.

King-Eliagh wrote:

I'm right eh?

It clearly shoulda been no result.

Beaussie pulled out in his very first post

No he didn't, Dunce. Stop sooking, and take a long walk on a short pier!

Ah read his post again. He pulled out of making any claim. Man you AFL bums dont read much eh.

No, you only read what you want to read. STFU.

Hey Xman! TIme for this to be locked surely? The decision has been made.

I read the whole lot in my role as official adjudicator. And beaussie clearly stated he made no claim whatsoever. :D

I quoted him above.

BTW i love your second line above nsw You're gettin pummeled in here! Xman, its time to protect the littlest aflfan once more. lock this baby up! NOW!

King-Eliagh wrote:

I'm right eh?

It clearly shoulda been no result.

Beaussie pulled out in his very first post

No you are Completely wrong.

Rule 8. Once a claim is challenged and entered in to the BS file the claimant cannot back out. If you are silly enough to make the statement without at least accompanying it with "in my opinion" or "I believe", you deserve the BS point for being stupid!

This is exactly what beaussies did. He made a comment without qualifying it as an opinion. He later said it was but according to the rules that isn't allowed once the challenge is made. This rule is designed to stop people making stupid claims and later saying they were opininipns only.

Correct decision.

And yet he still won the battle!

Dunce, you are the one who should be locked up. You've got no idea at all.

Shoot, I stand corrected. I was wrong in my address of this file. Parra was right, Beaussie shoulda got the BS point after all!

Oh dear oh dear oh me. Credibility of the BS file lost. Beaussie showed his cards when he tried to back out of this one, this really should have been picked up better by Xman. A lesson for you to learn Xman

King-Eliagh wrote:

Shoot, I stand corrected. I was wrong in my address of this file. Parra was right, Beaussie shoulda got the BS point after all!

Oh dear oh dear oh me. Credibility of the BS file lost. Beaussie showed his cards when he tried to back out of this one, this really should have been picked up better by Xman. A lesson for you to learn Xman

I doesn't and shouldn't change the decision because it doesn't change the validity of his claim!

Thank god you're not judging! You've got absolutely NFI!