Talking Footy

Funny how he avoids answering .
Well he did try once ,but fucked it up royally


He claimed he said it was James .

I posted his post that said K Packer . Caught lying .
Then unbelievably he said they were the same person .

Brain dead does not begin to explain his logic..

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Funny how he avoids answering .
Well he did try once ,but fucked it up royally


He claimed he said it was James .

I posted his post that said K Packer . Caught lying .
Then unbelievably he said they were the same person .

Brain dead does not begin to explain his logic..

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
poor ol dumbo

Raiderdave wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Funny how he avoids answering .
Well he did try once ,but fucked it up royally


He claimed he said it was James .

I posted his post that said K Packer . Caught lying .
Then unbelievably he said they were the same person .

Brain dead does not begin to explain his logic..

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
poor ol dumbo

poor little raiders, no one is buying their cheapo memberships

At this rate dribbler the raiders are going to have more players than members

still no memberships sold for those poor little raiders

Jesus it's dumb .
By your fucked up logic dumbo the Sadelaide Crows have sold NO memberships.

How do you function in society when you are plainly in need of help?

The_Wookie wrote:

thats probably not true. Not released or announced is not the same as not being sold.

would they be to embarrassed to release the figures

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Jesus it's dumb .
By your fucked up logic dumbo the Sadelaide Crows have sold NO memberships.

How do you function in society when you are plainly in need of help?

the crows had around 50k members last year,
the raiders had around 9k

its more a case, the little raiders are struggling to have any one sign

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Jesus it's dumb .
By your fucked up logic dumbo the Sadelaide Crows have sold NO memberships.

How do you function in society when you are plainly in need of help?

the crows had around 50k members last year,
the raiders had around 9k

its more a case, the little raiders are struggling to have any one sign

Deflection .
You are going on with some shit about the Raiders having no members because they have not released any numbers yet.
Neither has Adelaide .
They are the same .
Your logic as usual is fucked up .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Jesus it's dumb .
By your fucked up logic dumbo the Sadelaide Crows have sold NO memberships.

How do you function in society when you are plainly in need of help?

the crows had around 50k members last year,
the raiders had around 9k

its more a case, the little raiders are struggling to have any one sign

Deflection .
You are going on with some shit about the Raiders having no members because they have not released any numbers yet.
Neither has Adelaide .
They are the same .
Your logic as usual is fucked up .

simple spazza
Adeliade Crows
Crowd home games 48046k
Members 57,231k

Canberra Raiders
Crowd Home games 96089k :_<> admitted fudged crowds
Members 8,210k



going by those figures, spazza. the Crowds haven't released theirs because they haven't. The Raiders haven't because the numbers are too embarrassing

Lol no .

You can't have it both ways
If any club hasn't released membership numbers ,then that means they have none .
That is what you are claiming .

When shown how mind numbingly stupid that is ,you try to change .

Sorry dumbo you can't say that for one club & something different for another ..when both are sitting on 0 because they haven't released numbers yet.


Oh wait on ..
k Packer might be buying a heap ..
That will get the numbers up .

Calling you a fucking brain dead moron is an insult to any moron out there .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol no .

You can't have it both ways
If any club hasn't released membership numbers ,then that means they have none .
That is what you are claiming .

When shown how mind numbingly stupid that is ,you try to change .

Sorry dumbo you can't say that for one club & something different for another ..when both are sitting on 0 because they haven't released numbers yet.


Oh wait on ..
k Packer might be buying a heap ..
That will get the numbers up .

Calling you a fucking brain dead moron is an insult to any moron out there .

no it doesn't spazza
based on last season, the crows had nearly 60k members & crowd average would have been higher, but only capped due to capacity of the ground.

then you have the little monnow raiders. fudged crowd numbers, pissy membership numbers

its more a case the crows haven't kept up with their membership numbers this year, & the raiders are to embarrassed to release theirs

RL club hasn't released member numbers

Bhaaaaaaa. They have none .



AFL club hasn't released member numbers

They have plenty ...of course they do ,.

Dumbo logic .lol
Your logic is so fucked it's not funny anymore .

You cannot apply a rule or a principle to one & not the other .

Shows how out of touch with reality you are

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Jesus it's dumb .
By your fucked up logic dumbo the Sadelaide Crows have sold NO memberships.

How do you function in society when you are plainly in need of help?

the crows had around 50k members last year,
the raiders had around 9k

its more a case, the little raiders are struggling to have any one sign

Deflection .
You are going on with some shit about the Raiders having no members because they have not released any numbers yet.
Neither has Adelaide .
They are the same .
Your logic as usual is fucked up .

simple spazza
Adeliade Crows
Crowd home games 48046k
Members 57,231k

Canberra Raiders
Crowd Home games 96089k :_<> admitted fudged crowds
Members 8,210k



going by those figures, spazza. the Crowds haven't released theirs because they haven't. The Raiders haven't because the numbers are too embarrassing

shit
>
we had the highest average home attendance of any professional sporting organisation on the planet according to dumbo

96089

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
seriously
can you post anything right you dumb raider

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Jesus it's dumb .
By your fucked up logic dumbo the Sadelaide Crows have sold NO memberships.

How do you function in society when you are plainly in need of help?

the crows had around 50k members last year,
the raiders had around 9k

its more a case, the little raiders are struggling to have any one sign

Deflection .
You are going on with some shit about the Raiders having no members because they have not released any numbers yet.
Neither has Adelaide .
They are the same .
Your logic as usual is fucked up .

. the Crowds haven't released theirs because they haven't. The Raiders haven't because the numbers are too embarrassing

the crowds >

a new team eh

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
smashed on metho

absolutely off his trolley .... again

staggering around bumping into things
burping & farting

a strong smell of rancid cat vomit maybe ?
no
hes shit his pants as well has he ?

:_<> :_<> :_<>
poor old dumbo
a battler
a real battler