Oh now its 4.4mXman wrote:That is proof. I didn't think it would please you. at worst the ratings would be 4.4m, way higher than your biggest ever SOO game, and not even in primetime.eelofwest wrote:Sorry Xman in the real world we need proof to make such claims, so with that in mind your comment about 4.6M for 2005 GF are unfounded and there for should be put straight into the BS files.Xman wrote:There is no source for the regional TV ratings for that year. Therefore it's simply a matter of extrapolation. Last years AFL GF rated 2.64m metro audience and 930k regionals. So the total was 3.57m
That's 26% regional or the regional ratings are 35% of the metro.
Well in 2005 the AFL GF rated 3.386m metro only. 35% of this is 1.185m. Add the two together and you have 4.57m.
Easy![]()
You can get stuffed with the bs file crap. None of you guys participate in it anyway. You can't just pick and chose.



Mate keep living in the past wandering what your ratings might have been in 2005, we in the NRL will worry about the now(4.047M confirmed, 11.9M for the series = Winning)and right at this moment it is a wonderful time to be a Rugby league supporter.

