Talking Footy

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

The butthurt from AFL fans is amazing.

My butts fine. It must sting that your best rating game ever is still over 10% less than the best AFL ratings. :D

Every time Origin roles around Xman goes into depression no doubt. Butthurt from Xman is legendary.

Keep fighting the good fight Xman, i know you feel like your life has less meaning knowing that Code you were taught all you life to hate is coming to get you....

I can't help it if the best RL can do is sub par. :P

Funny cause the AFL can't offer anything close to match it

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

Funny cause the AFL can't offer anything close to match it

Is that why the AFLs GFs are ahead?

the AFLs GFs get 3.5m to 4.5 every year and in the lowest rating time of the week

Have you got anything besides the gf that rates?

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

Have you got anything besides the gf that rates?

Yeah, our season......

Xman wrote:

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

Funny cause the AFL can't offer anything close to match it

Is that why the AFLs GFs are ahead?

the AFLs GFs get 3.5m to 4.5 every year and in the lowest rating time of the week

I still cant see proof of this 4.6M viewers for 2005 GF.......... ??

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

Funny cause the AFL can't offer anything close to match it

Is that why the AFLs GFs are ahead?

the AFLs GFs get 3.5m to 4.5 every year and in the lowest rating time of the week

I still cant see proof of this 4.6M viewers for 2005 GF.......... ??

5 city alone was 3.3m. The average regional audience has been 1m when the 5 city result was only 2.6m.

Can't you count?

Xman wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

Is that why the AFLs GFs are ahead?

the AFLs GFs get 3.5m to 4.5 every year and in the lowest rating time of the week

I still cant see proof of this 4.6M viewers for 2005 GF.......... ??

5 city alone was 3.3m. The average regional audience has been 1m when the 5 city result was only 2.6m.

Can't you count?

So you mean to tell me that the 1.3 Million regionals for origin 3 is the same as the 2005 GF of 1.3m regionals? Wow you really are crazy.

Still need proof of your so called 4.6M 2005 GF, if you cant provide it then its time for your BS File to be opened up once more. :D

The 2005 NRL Grand Final between West and North Queensland outrated the AFL's Grand Final!

pussycat wrote:

The 2005 NRL Grand Final between West and North Queensland outrated the AFL's Grand Final!

According to this list they were 800k behind!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Au ... s_for_2005

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

The 2005 NRL Grand Final between West and North Queensland outrated the AFL's Grand Final!

According to this list they were 800k behind!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Au ... s_for_2005

Not all people live in capitol cities though. There is life outside the walls

pussycat wrote:

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

The 2005 NRL Grand Final between West and North Queensland outrated the AFL's Grand Final!

According to this list they were 800k behind!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Au ... s_for_2005

Not all people live in capitol cities though. There is life outside the walls

So, hang on, you're 800k behind. For the last three GFs you've averaged 1.1m regional audience. The AFL have averaged mid 900ks. Your regional GF ratings would need to be 1.7-1.8m to have a hope of breaking even with the AFL.

Got any links for this 4.6 mil xman?

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

Got any links for this 4.6 mil xman?

Add the numbers. It ain't hard.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entert ... 6417681324

It said in the paper today it was the 2nd highest sporting event since Oztam began. No1. Was a Pat Rafter match.!