Page 16 of 185
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:34 pm
by TLPG
Rubbish. The money for the CLUBS is in memberships - and attendances! RL does not dominate in TV. On a nationwide scale, AFL is winning. RL only rates in two states out of the six, and the regionals DON'T MATTER to advertisers. The advertising money is primarily in Sydney and Melbourne, and on TV the AFL is winning the combined battle.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:28 pm
by Beaussie
pussycat wrote:Beaussie wrote:pussycat wrote:
Ch.7 have said they will bid. Only Time Wll tell if they are serious.
Two new RL programs have recently started on One. Seems a strange thing to do if there trying to shut it down.

ONE HD also launched another 2 new AFL shows this season bringing it to 4 AFL shows on the channel. As we now know, that meant nothing when it came to bidding for the AFL rights. Remember the guy who was head of Ten/ONE HD when the sports programming was being pursued has now had his employment terminated since Murdoch came on the scene. Coincidence? I think not.
Your right, though he was terminated because he was doing a piss poor job. They wer'nt making money. Both Packer and Murdoch both know Rugby League makes money.
Arn't you contradicting yourself? If 4 new sports programs have been recently put on One why would you think ther thier to shut One down?
Those 4 new sports programs started before Murdoch came on the scene. Whether any of them are there next season including the new NRL programs remains to be seen.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:31 pm
by Beaussie
pussycat wrote:We both know the AFL get more fans to the games . It's An undisputable fact, so stop repeating it. Its TV that Rugby league dominates in and thats where the money is.
Please feel free to point out any week, yes any week where the NRL has outrated the AFL nationally in 2011, 2010, 2009 or 2008. Comon, we're waiting.
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2010.php
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2009.php
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2008.php
Keep dreaming sunshine.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:07 pm
by pussycat
Even without using the 'bogus' regional figures they beat the AFL every week there a test or origin game. And that regardless of the fact that they only currently have half as many matches on FTA.
On Pay TV they slaughter you every week.
James Paker first took a large stake in C10 in Oct of 2010, before selling half his stake to Lachlan later that same month.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:36 pm
by TLPG
Come on, provide links to figures that contradict Beau's.
Or admit that you're wrong.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:51 pm
by pussycat
TLPG wrote:Come on, provide links to figures that contradict Beau's.
Or admit that you're wrong.
The ratings figures are on this site Einstien!
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:20 pm
by TLPG
And Beau pointed out that they proved you wrong, Newton!
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:42 pm
by King-Eliagh
TLPG wrote:And Beau pointed out that they proved you wrong, Newton!

His name stands for Be-Aussie, you dimwit, not Beau.
And secondly let me set this fukkin shite straight. Both beaussie and pussycat are correct in this instance. Beaussie is right, only to the extent that the AFL beats league in every normal round of play in the TV ratings. Pussycat is also right that "even without the regional figures the NRL wins every time there is a test or origin match regardless of the fact that League has only half as many matches on FTA."
In this instance Pussycat wins by a thumping knockout because he never made a fool of himself and stated beaussies figures were wrong he just provided a valid argument to suggest that Beaussie wasnt telling an important part of the story.
TLPG once again has set his balls on a desk in front of a man with a mallet because he cries pussycat is wrong when he's not. While me thinks Beaussie is once again scampering madly through internet sites to find his next statistic which can be read as a success story for the AFL... ... the topics dont change and the saga continues.
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:39 am
by Beaussie
King-Eliagh wrote:And secondly let me set this fukkin shite straight. Both beaussie and pussycat are correct in this instance. Beaussie is right, only to the extent that the AFL beats league in every normal round of play in the TV ratings. Pussycat is also right that "even without the regional figures the NRL wins every time there is a test or origin match regardless of the fact that League has only half as many matches on FTA."
Since when are test matches or origin games part of the NRL?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:43 am
by Beaussie
pussycat wrote:
Even without using the 'bogus' regional figures they beat the AFL every week there a test or origin game. And that regardless of the fact that they only currently have half as many matches on FTA.
No wrong again. Look at the figures for crying out loud. As for your final point, wrong again. There are 4 FTA AFL games per round and 3 NRL FTA gamers per round. Good to see you've finally admitted the regional figures are 'bogus' though.
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:03 am
by King-Eliagh
Beaussie wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:And secondly let me set this fukkin shite straight. Both beaussie and pussycat are correct in this instance. Beaussie is right, only to the extent that the AFL beats league in every normal round of play in the TV ratings. Pussycat is also right that "even without the regional figures the NRL wins every time there is a test or origin match regardless of the fact that League has only half as many matches on FTA."
Since when are test matches or origin games part of the NRL?

Technicalities dont change jack beaussie and you know it. Lets just call it Rugby League then shall we.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:41 am
by TLPG
Beaussie wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:And secondly let me set this fukkin shite straight. Both beaussie and pussycat are correct in this instance. Beaussie is right, only to the extent that the AFL beats league in every normal round of play in the TV ratings. Pussycat is also right that "even without the regional figures the NRL wins every time there is a test or origin match regardless of the fact that League has only half as many matches on FTA."
Since when are test matches or origin games part of the NRL?

They are adding that because they know that without it, thugby would be even worse off in both attendances and ratings! It'd drop like a stone! Remember that the AFL has NO rep games in their figures, and yet the AFL is more than competitive!
Gee, I wonder just how committed the NRL is to club footy, huh?
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:49 am
by Beaussie
Haven't done the calculations as yet but I'm guessing that Origin or Tests plus the entire round of NRL that respective week, still fails to match the national ratings of the corresponding AFL round.
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:58 am
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:Good to see you've finally admitted the regional figures are 'bogus' though.
Regionals are not Bogus. It's only people who live in a fantasy worlds who cannot accept them. People who like to bury there head in the seand and pretend they dont exist because they dont fit into your fantasy 'Never, Never land' point of view. But this is the real world, people from Newcastle, Woolongong etc buy groceries, cars and go on holidays. ie There just like the rest of us! Advertising dollars are directed towards them, just like the rest of us. They don't take regional ratings for something to do. The AFL might like to ignore these figures but the TV networks are well aware of them
.
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:23 pm
by King-Eliagh
TLPG - Beaussie Test Matches and SOO's ARE Rugby League
Secondly less FTA games for Rugby League. Pussycat makes a fine point which you bitches cant handle.
The pair of you need to grow some nuts and stop crying when fair points are made. You're both acting like a pair of whining donkeys. And its somewhat hypocritical yet well within reason that I, the King, need to tell you pair to GROW UP!
Yeah that's right Peanut and Bearthur/Lord of the peanut, act your age!
