Talking Footy

pHyR3 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

How about TV ratings swans would lose every time.there's note to popularity than crowds. Unfortunately RL in oz had a culture of staying home and watching, me included.

yeah can some NRL fan please provide some evidence of this?!
time after time, it is asked and they cannot prove shit
the AFL owns them in this department, even with the SOO the AFL still attracts more.

Notice how I said swans not AFL. Also this doesn't include SOO I bring it up every time you post it.

is soo part of the NRL? yes

pHyR3 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

How about TV ratings swans would lose every time.there's note to popularity than crowds. Unfortunately RL in oz had a culture of staying home and watching, me included.

yeah can some NRL fan please provide some evidence of this?!
time after time, it is asked and they cannot prove shit
the AFL owns them in this department, even with the SOO the AFL still attracts more.

Notice how I said swans not AFL. Also this doesn't include SOO I bring it up every time you post it.

it does, state of origin is NRL. so the total figures would be a lot less
there is nothing that google i can find about the TV ratings of the break down of AFL vs NRL in the states, of there was id post it
asidefrom the AFL owning the NRL in sponsorship, Revenue, membership, crowds, what else can you go buy

pHyR3 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

How about TV ratings swans would lose every time.there's note to popularity than crowds. Unfortunately RL in oz had a culture of staying home and watching, me included.

yeah can some NRL fan please provide some evidence of this?!
time after time, it is asked and they cannot prove shit
the AFL owns them in this department, even with the SOO the AFL still attracts more.

Notice how I said swans not AFL. Also this doesn't include SOO I bring it up every time you post it.

So can I take your lack of serious argument to the KPI's above as an admission that you now concede Sydney Swans are the Biggest club in any sport in Sydney?

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

How about TV ratings swans would lose every time.there's note to popularity than crowds. Unfortunately RL in oz had a culture of staying home and watching, me included.

yeah can some NRL fan please provide some evidence of this?!
time after time, it is asked and they cannot prove shit
the AFL owns them in this department, even with the SOO the AFL still attracts more.

Notice how I said swans not AFL. Also this doesn't include SOO I bring it up every time you post it.

So can I take your lack of serious argument to the KPI's above as an admission that you now concede Sydney Swans are the Biggest club in any sport in Sydney?

they are in fact.... the smallest mangina boy

28K attending games
50K watching on the box in ol Sydney town

that's 78K

Penrith ( our smallest Sydney based club )
12K attending
300K watching on TV in ol Sydney town

that's 312K

& the lesson endith ............... here !

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

How about TV ratings swans would lose every time.there's note to popularity than crowds. Unfortunately RL in oz had a culture of staying home and watching, me included.

yeah can some NRL fan please provide some evidence of this?!
time after time, it is asked and they cannot prove shit
the AFL owns them in this department, even with the SOO the AFL still attracts more.

Notice how I said swans not AFL. Also this doesn't include SOO I bring it up every time you post it.

So can I take your lack of serious argument to the KPI's above as an admission that you now concede Sydney Swans are the Biggest club in any sport in Sydney?

they are in fact.... the smallest mangina boy

28K attending games
50K watching on the box in ol Sydney town

that's 78K

Penrith ( our smallest Sydney based club )
12K attending
300K watching on TV in ol Sydney town

that's 312K

& the lesson endith ............... here !

Yes when all else fails stick to ONE KPI and disregard every other KPI - thats the RD way! Regardless of whether you can say which fans are watching their side or the opposition! No......very clear Swans have the runs on the board! You'll have to up your dosage on your meds again RD....your starting to imagine things, lesson ends here!

Raiderdave wrote:

they are in fact.... the smallest mangina boy

28K attending games
50K watching on the box in ol Sydney town

that's 78K

Penrith ( our smallest Sydney based club )
12K attending
300K watching on TV in ol Sydney town

that's 312K

& the lesson endith ............... here !

Swans made about $280,000*
Penrith made about $120,000*

Try again, Dave!

[* Estimate based on an average $10 per person paid at the gate or via local ticketing agents - error corrected]

Swans were up top, penrith struggled against my mob

Nrl heartland though eels. ??

And shit teams when going shit (in my teams case shit the majority of time) don't get supported no where near as much as they do when winning, it's the same for every sports team on the planet, why would Penrith and Parramatta be any different?

I see North Melbourne struggling compared to other AFL clubs, aren't they in AFL heartland?

What about the Melbourne Demons, heck, they're going strong I heard, aren't they a Melbourne heartland club too?

Where was Port Barrelaide when they were losing, crowds down near the bottom?

Fair dinkum, like arguing with a 2 year old who's eaten 15 kilos of candy.

The stats site is down right now but I'll bet Melbourne and North Melbourne had higher crowd averages than Penrith and Parramatta!! So much for your rant, ParraEel!

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And shit teams when going shit (in my teams case shit the majority of time) don't get supported no where near as much as they do when winning, it's the same for every sports team on the planet, why would Penrith and Parramatta be any different?

I see North Melbourne struggling compared to other AFL clubs, aren't they in AFL heartland?

What about the Melbourne Demons, heck, they're going strong I heard, aren't they a Melbourne heartland club too?

Where was Port Barrelaide when they were losing, crowds down near the bottom?

Fair dinkum, like arguing with a 2 year old who's eaten 15 kilos of candy.

I don't know if I'd call 30k+ membership and a crowd average in excess of 25k struggling - but I suppose in comparison to Collingwood with 80k membership and 50k average crowd yes you could say that! But Sydney Swans since 1994 have had the highest crowd average in Sydney with the biggest budget, sponsorship etc etc - membership has also been greater than ANY RL side (at times even Brisbane Broncos) No Parra Swans are the number one club in Sydney - but I can't blame you for grasping at straws!

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And shit teams when going shit (in my teams case shit the majority of time) don't get supported no where near as much as they do when winning, it's the same for every sports team on the planet, why would Penrith and Parramatta be any different?

I see North Melbourne struggling compared to other AFL clubs, aren't they in AFL heartland?

What about the Melbourne Demons, heck, they're going strong I heard, aren't they a Melbourne heartland club too?

Where was Port Barrelaide when they were losing, crowds down near the bottom?

Fair dinkum, like arguing with a 2 year old who's eaten 15 kilos of candy.

I don't know if I'd call 30k+ membership and a crowd average in excess of 25k struggling - but I suppose in comparison to Collingwood with 80k membership and 50k average crowd yes you could say that! But Sydney Swans since 1994 have had the highest crowd average in Sydney with the biggest budget, sponsorship etc etc - membership has also been greater than ANY RL side (at times even Brisbane Broncos) No Parra Swans are the number one club in Sydney - but I can't blame you for grasping at straws!

He didn't say swans......gee whiz. Reading comprehension is very poor...

They just won the premiership a couple of years ago right?

pHyR3 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And shit teams when going shit (in my teams case shit the majority of time) don't get supported no where near as much as they do when winning, it's the same for every sports team on the planet, why would Penrith and Parramatta be any different?

I see North Melbourne struggling compared to other AFL clubs, aren't they in AFL heartland?

What about the Melbourne Demons, heck, they're going strong I heard, aren't they a Melbourne heartland club too?

Where was Port Barrelaide when they were losing, crowds down near the bottom?

Fair dinkum, like arguing with a 2 year old who's eaten 15 kilos of candy.

I don't know if I'd call 30k+ membership and a crowd average in excess of 25k struggling - but I suppose in comparison to Collingwood with 80k membership and 50k average crowd yes you could say that! But Sydney Swans since 1994 have had the highest crowd average in Sydney with the biggest budget, sponsorship etc etc - membership has also been greater than ANY RL side (at times even Brisbane Broncos) No Parra Swans are the number one club in Sydney - but I can't blame you for grasping at straws!

He didn't say swans......gee whiz. Reading comprehension is very poor...

They just won the premiership a couple of years ago right?

My point was ladder position isn't always an excuse - as he was trying to say - I bet Penrith would love to have the crowds of ANY of the AFL clubs he mentioned when they were doing great (for that matter ANY of the rest of the Sydney based RL sides). Sydney Swans has had consistently since 1994 the highest average crowds, largest membership etc etc! They are the BIGGEST club in Sydney without doubt!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

they are in fact.... the smallest mangina boy

28K attending games
50K watching on the box in ol Sydney town

that's 78K

Penrith ( our smallest Sydney based club )
12K attending
300K watching on TV in ol Sydney town

that's 312K

& the lesson endith ............... here !

Swans made about $28,000*
Penrith made about $12,000*

Try again, Dave!

[* Estimate based on an average $10 per person paid at the gate or via local ticketing agents ]

ahhhhh
based on yr calculations ... everyone paid $1 .... you complete tool :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And shit teams when going shit (in my teams case shit the majority of time) don't get supported no where near as much as they do when winning, it's the same for every sports team on the planet, why would Penrith and Parramatta be any different?

I see North Melbourne struggling compared to other AFL clubs, aren't they in AFL heartland?

What about the Melbourne Demons, heck, they're going strong I heard, aren't they a Melbourne heartland club too?

Where was Port Barrelaide when they were losing, crowds down near the bottom?

Fair dinkum, like arguing with a 2 year old who's eaten 15 kilos of candy.

I don't know if I'd call a crowd average in excess of 25k struggling -!

when you consider they did averaged 37K in 2007
& now its 25K

well
that's the very definition of....... struggling you twat :_<> :_<> :_<>