Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Ohhh, so misleading, isn't that the same thing mr moderator?

Are you going to warn yourself now for posting something without proof?

Not really. Fudged suggests deliberate deception. Misleading suggests the numbers don't tell the entire truth, whether deliberately or not. Are you questioning cos' link? It's pretty clear.

Xman wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Here's the official release

http://www.nrl.com/rabbitohs-break-the- ... lt.aspxThe South Sydney Rabbitohs are proud to announce that the Club has surpassed the 20,000 Member milestone yesterday


Here's the truth

http://www.rleague.com/content/article.php?id=38914
Being the first Club to hit 20,000 Members, of which over 12,000 are Ticketed Members,


It's there. The NRL on their official site fudged it's membership figures.
Game set and match.

what further discussion do you want.

And what is the make up of the 8000 non ticketted members?

How does that differ from the AFLs tally which appears to include some non ticketted members?

I must say though, the percentage of non ticketted members seems awfully large!

The bigfooty post that was shown had only 10% non ticketted members from memory. The NRL number posted is near 40%!

Raiderdave wrote:

meanwhile I hear teams like the Swans have 33% of their 25K as non ticketed
& many other AFL clubs ..... the same

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Here's the official release

http://www.nrl.com/rabbitohs-break-the- ... lt.aspxThe South Sydney Rabbitohs are proud to announce that the Club has surpassed the 20,000 Member milestone yesterday


Here's the truth

http://www.rleague.com/content/article.php?id=38914
Being the first Club to hit 20,000 Members, of which over 12,000 are Ticketed Members,


It's there. The NRL on their official site fudged it's membership figures.
Game set and match.

what further discussion do you want.

And what is the make up of the 8000 non ticketted members?

How does that differ from the AFLs tally which appears to include some non ticketted members?

I must say though, the percentage of non ticketted members seems awfully large!

The bigfooty post that was shown had only 10% non ticketted members from memory. The NRL number posted is near 40%!

you think Souths tally's is indicative of the entire comp & Ricmonds is for the AFL ?
nearly 85% of NRL memberships are ticketed you dribbling dipstick
of our 180,824 Members in 2011... 142,322 were ticketed

http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

meanwhile I hear teams like the Swans have 33% of their 25K as non ticketed
& many other AFL clubs ..... the same

you simply cannot a breakdown from the AFL like you do from the NRL for this
because the real truth would be revealed

the shameful truth revealed

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

And what is the make up of the 8000 non ticketted members?

How does that differ from the AFLs tally which appears to include some non ticketted members?

I must say though, the percentage of non ticketted members seems awfully large!

The bigfooty post that was shown had only 10% non ticketted members from memory. The NRL number posted is near 40%!

you think Souths tally's is indicative of the entire comp & Ricmonds is for the AFL ?
nearly 85% of NRL memberships are ticketed you dribbling dipstick
of our 180,824 Members in 2011... 142,322 were ticketed

http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

meanwhile I hear teams like the Swans have 33% of their 25K as non ticketed
& many other AFL clubs ..... the same

you simply cannot a breakdown from the AFL like you do from the NRL for this
because the real truth would be revealed

the shameful truth revealed

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

meanwhile I hear teams like the Swans have 33% of their 25K as non ticketed
& many other AFL clubs ..... the same

What you hear from your RL pals is not fact or reality sunshine. Fancy calling for this thread to be deleted and then making a ridiculous claim like that with no evidence other than what you hear.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

And what is the make up of the 8000 non ticketted members?

How does that differ from the AFLs tally which appears to include some non ticketted members?

I must say though, the percentage of non ticketted members seems awfully large!

The bigfooty post that was shown had only 10% non ticketted members from memory. The NRL number posted is near 40%!

you think Souths tally's is indicative of the entire comp & Ricmonds is for the AFL ?
nearly 85% of NRL memberships are ticketed you dribbling dipstick
of our 180,824 Members in 2011... 142,322 were ticketed

http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

meanwhile I hear teams like the Swans have 33% of their 25K as non ticketed
& many other AFL clubs ..... the same

you simply cannot a breakdown from the AFL like you do from the NRL for this
because the real truth would be revealed

the shameful truth revealed

I said the NRL number POSTED! Not the entire league. Learn to read

The fact the rabbitohs have such a number smacks of fudging IMO

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you think Souths tally's is indicative of the entire comp & Ricmonds is for the AFL ?
nearly 85% of NRL memberships are ticketed you dribbling dipstick
of our 180,824 Members in 2011... 142,322 were ticketed

http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

meanwhile I hear teams like the Swans have 33% of their 25K as non ticketed
& many other AFL clubs ..... the same

you simply cannot a breakdown from the AFL like you do from the NRL for this
because the real truth would be revealed

the shameful truth revealed

I said the NRL number POSTED! Not the entire league. Learn to read

The fact the rabbitohs have such a number smacks of fudging IMO

Fudged

the NRL release their non ticketed figures
they have no fear in that ... fudging

the only fidging is from the AFL..... GWS has 12K members last year ...... ALL NON TICKETED ...

why does the AFL NOT release their figures like the NRL does
scared of the dirty lil lie being exposed

Fudge
Fudge

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I said the NRL number POSTED! Not the entire league. Learn to read

The fact the rabbitohs have such a number smacks of fudging IMO

Fudged

the NRL release their non ticketed figures
they have no fear in that ... fudging

the only fidging is from the AFL..... GWS has 12K members last year ...... ALL NON TICKETED ...

why does the AFL NOT release their figures like the NRL does
scared of the dirty lil lie being exposed

Fudge
Fudge

How were the GWS going to have ticketted members last year when they didn't play a game??

What tickets were on offer?

Beaussie wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Fudged

the NRL release their non ticketed figures
they have no fear in that ... fudging

the only fidging is from the AFL..... GWS has 12K members last year ...... ALL NON TICKETED ...

why does the AFL NOT release their figures like the NRL does
scared of the dirty lil lie being exposed

Fudge
Fudge

How were the GWS going to have ticketted members last year when they didn't play a game??

What tickets were on offer?

A GWS Foundation membership provided for entry to all home games in the NEAFL.

Xman wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Xman wrote:

How were the GWS going to have ticketted members last year when they didn't play a game??

What tickets were on offer?

A GWS Foundation membership provided for entry to all home games in the NEAFL.

Who going to pay a membership to see half a side play in a suburban league?

Beaussie wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Fudged

the NRL release their non ticketed figures
they have no fear in that ... fudging

the only fidging is from the AFL..... GWS has 12K members last year ...... ALL NON TICKETED ...

why does the AFL NOT release their figures like the NRL does
scared of the dirty lil lie being exposed

Fudge
Fudge

How were the GWS going to have ticketted members last year when they didn't play a game??

What tickets were on offer?

A GWS Foundation membership provided for entry to all home games in the NEAFL.