Talking Footy

NRL is well over double in front.

melbourne city 10,008!

sydneyfc wrote:

melbourne city 10,008!

:_<>


Souths have that many already
& theyve only been on sale for 2 weeks

Theyll have 30000 by christmas

Making the oi league look like a joke are the ol bunnies

Raiderdave wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

melbourne city 10,008!

:_<>


Souths have that many already
& theyve only been on sale for 2 weeks

Theyll have 30000 by christmas

Making the oi league look like a joke are the ol bunnies

and where do the raiders sit in all of this

7k? 8k? that's a good little boy davey

Melbourne Victory: 22,201
WS Wanderers: 18,176
Brisbane Roar: 13,400
Sydney FC: 11,041
Melbourne City: 10,038
Newcastle Jets: 8,520
Adelaide UTD: 7,384
CC Mariners: 5,539
Perth Glory: 5,181
Wellington: 3,721

total: 105,201

Raiderdave wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

melbourne city 10,008!

:_<>


Souths have that many already
& theyve only been on sale for 2 weeks

Theyll have 30000 by christmas

Making the oi league look like a joke are the ol bunnies

thats still more than what your pathetic raiders have dave
melbourne city have only been around a few years and been pretty bad.
come back and comment when the raiders make some improvement

Silly comment, the raiders represent a population under half a million while the Sokka team in Melbourne has a potential 4.5 million people to get to follow them locally.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Silly comment, the raiders represent a population under half a million while the Sokka team in Melbourne has a potential 4.5 million people to get to follow them locally.

Plus the Raiders compete with the Brumbies & midgets for support in their backyard

These greazy sucker clubs compete with no one & the raiders smash them for members as a % of population :_<>

1/50 people in the Canberra region.is a Raiders member
Far more then any oi league club in their area

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Silly comment, the raiders represent a population under half a million while the Sokka team in Melbourne has a potential 4.5 million people to get to follow them locally.

in a AFL dominated state, 2 Rucby teams and another soccer team.
Melbourne city have only been around a few years and been pretty bad

the raiders have been around for decades and compete against a union side

leagueiscrap wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Silly comment, the raiders represent a population under half a million while the Sokka team in Melbourne has a potential 4.5 million people to get to follow them locally.

in a AFL dominated state, 2 Rucby teams and another soccer team.
Melbourne city have only been around a few years and been pretty bad

the raiders have been around for decades and compete against a union side

And...
The stupidest c**** on the internet strikes again :_<>

Exactly which oopsies & derpies teams.. or rugby or NRL teams do spazbournes 2 sooker teams compete against?
Among 4. Something million people
They have the entire place between them
While the ACT has 3 teams in 3 codes all in winter with 1/10th of the population

Before you swill your metho
Next time think you fucking ******

population bla bla bla, not my problem you live in a backwater piss ant town

read the facts pisser

8k members and decreasing
9k avg attendance, and decreasing

with no ability to attract any decent players to their club

melbourne city are backed by the richest sporting institution on the planet, the raiders are backed by a handful of fans and a local govt who don't believe they can afford to pay rent fees for a new stadium ffs :_<>

looks like a relocation to the central coast looks more than likely for the raiders franchise

accept the facts, smell it, taste it...live it davey

Raiderdave wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Silly comment, the raiders represent a population under half a million while the Sokka team in Melbourne has a potential 4.5 million people to get to follow them locally.

in a AFL dominated state, 2 Rucby teams and another soccer team.
Melbourne city have only been around a few years and been pretty bad

the raiders have been around for decades and compete against a union side

And...
The stupidest c**** on the internet strikes again :_<>

Exactly which oopsies & derpies teams.. or rugby or NRL teams do spazbournes 2 sooker teams compete against?
Among 4. Something million people
They have the entire place between them
While the ACT has 3 teams in 3 codes all in winter with 1/10th of the population

Before you swill your metho
Next time think you fucking ******

dribbler dave is making excuses again!!

no dave there in no AFL team in Canberra
there are 2 teams in Canberra. both rugby teams
the same shit game, union for the people with half a brain, and league people with ut a brain. eg thats you

Melbourne has at least 14 teams of the football codes
but wha'ts funny the two rugby teams are the most minnow of all of those teams as well

Geelong population 225,245 (2014)
the cats have 43,806 members from last season

Townsville 190,000 (estimated http://worldpopulationreview.com/world- ... opulation/)
North Qld cocksucking cowboys 12,005 members

Canberra 357,220 (2012)
the canberra tax payer & pensioner raiders..................................8,210k :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

the canberra braiders the most irrelevant team in Australia

leagueiscrap wrote:

no dave there in no AFL team in Canberra
there are 2 teams in Canberra. both rugby teams
the same shit game, union for the people with half a brain, and league people with ut a brain. eg thats you

Idiot.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

no dave there in no AFL team in Canberra
there are 2 teams in Canberra. both rugby teams
the same shit game, union for the people with half a brain, and league people with ut a brain. eg thats you

Idiot.

fact is fact!

Yes, and for the second time idiot, you haven't realised that while you were calling everyone else an idiot, you manged to stuff up the spelling of that sentence while telling us how stupid we are.