Talking Footy

If they had the balls to play there and finally show what support they have instead of pretending what they have, big difference.

post_hoc wrote:

I have been reading this website for a while and finally decided to post.

All I can say is wow, logic really goes out the window on this place. Parramatta Eels home ground attendance is inflated because of games played at homebush, you can not deny that fact.

Parra home ground attendance for the Eels is less than the Wanderers, simple fact. You can choose your own opinions, but you are can not choose your own facts.

But i'll tell you what, if you want to count Homebush, Wanderers gets to include Asian Champions League games in China, South Korea and Saudi Arabia, all of which over 50,000, deal?

What a fucking ****** argument?

We are talking HOME crowd averages.
Can you show me which games the WSW played in the above mentioned countries were "Home games?

Jesus h fuck you are a bright one ,go back to reading instead of posting.

Melbourne Victory: 21,902
WS Wanderers: 18,002
Brisbane Roar: 13,400
Sydney FC: 11,013
Melbourne City: 9,565
Newcastle Jets: 8,105
Adelaide UTD: 7,006
CC Mariners: 5,365
Perth Glory: 4,969
Wellington: 3,636

total: 102,963

Wow what an intellectual vocabulary you posses. Now correct me if I'm wrong but ANZ is actually home ground for the Bulldogs? Who else? So when parra plays there do those teams get free entry as well?

So my point (and yes it was absurd) to show the absurdity of the other argument. You play "home" games at other teams Home stadiums, it's. Sorry if it was too subtle for you, maybe I should just call you an idiot and believe that adds to the ite.

post_hoc wrote:

Wow what an intellectual vocabulary you posses. Now correct me if I'm wrong but ANZ is actually home ground for the Bulldogs? Who else? So when parra plays there do those teams get free entry as well?

So my point (and yes it was absurd) to show the absurdity of the other argument. You play "home" games at other teams Home stadiums, it's. Sorry if it was too subtle for you, maybe I should just call you an idiot and believe that adds to the ite.

What fucking bubble do you live in ?

In the AFlol,there are 2 stadiums In Melboring for 9 teams.

So teams can play at their home ground & be the away team.

The same for ANZ in Syd ,
NRL teams have home games at ANZ as well as their home grounds.

post_hoc wrote:

Wow what an intellectual vocabulary you posses. Now correct me if I'm wrong but ANZ is actually home ground for the Bulldogs? Who else? So when parra plays there do those teams get free entry as well?

So my point (and yes it was absurd) to show the absurdity of the other argument. You play "home" games at other teams Home stadiums, it's. Sorry if it was too subtle for you, maybe I should just call you an idiot and believe that adds to the ite.

what?

Melbourne Victory: 21,902
WS Wanderers: 18,010
Brisbane Roar: 13,400
Sydney FC: 11,013
Melbourne City: 9,687
Newcastle Jets: 8,105
Adelaide UTD: 7,006
CC Mariners: 5,365
Perth Glory: 4,969
Wellington: 3,636

total: 103,093

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Wow what an intellectual vocabulary you posses. Now correct me if I'm wrong but ANZ is actually home ground for the Bulldogs? Who else? So when parra plays there do those teams get free entry as well?

So my point (and yes it was absurd) to show the absurdity of the other argument. You play "home" games at other teams Home stadiums, it's. Sorry if it was too subtle for you, maybe I should just call you an idiot and believe that adds to the ite.

what?

Sorry I will use smaller words so you can understand. When Parra play home at ANZ against a team that uses ANZ as their home ground, I believe the "away" team like the Bulldogs their members get membership entry, ie FREE entry.

As opposed to any A League match, including the derby, the WSW fans that attended had to pay for those tickets.

So Parra's claims of massive home game attendance is in fact made up of members from BOTH teams. It is called reciprocal rights, am I wrong on this?

Still makes no sense whatsoever you flip.

An inconvenient truth perhaps? Parramatta's inflated home ground average includes games played at a ground where "away" members get in free.

Ummmm teams share stadiums, you mentioned that I think.

My team uses 3 stadiums at times, sometimes 2 and other times 1, what does it all mean?

You mean the disadvantage my team had this year when they had a guaranteed sell out vs Ricky Stuarts Raiders and the idiots took that game to Darwin this year and two weeks after they made the decision last year to take the game to Darwin, RS quits the eels and heads to the Raiders?

Oh, how does that go against Parramatta you knobend?

They got under half the crowd they would have at Parramatta.

3 games taken away from Parramatta wow.

Ever looked at who has every fucking record at the stadium you dopey Clark Kent?

Changing goal posts are you?

lol i think you'll find he does that pretty often

his views on sports are warped, he hasn't been to an eels game since "the barbed wire days" and needed a whole week of explaining what a season ticket was

Melbourne Victory: 21,902
WS Wanderers: 18,064
Brisbane Roar: 13,400
Sydney FC: 11,013
Melbourne City: 9,701
Newcastle Jets: 8,469
Adelaide UTD: 7,006
CC Mariners: 5,365
Perth Glory: 4,969
Wellington: 3,701

total: 103,590

How am I changing anything r3t@rd?

They play games at 3 stadiums, they did this year and they will for the next 3 years. Not my problem the WSW are either too scared to spread their name because they feel it's not wanted, or worried that taking a game to a big stadium and having the usual amount turn up will look absolutely pathetic thus giving away all their false self aggrandisement in one fell swoop?

Parramatta have contracts to play at three stadiums, they are paid money by two of those stadium companies to play games in their stadiums, just because no one wants to pay WSW to play at their ground doesn't mean everyone else should sit on their arse in the same spot having a crack at others with the balls to actually do something.

Maybe if sokka fans weren't such violent pr!cks who continually go on rampages in stadiums ruining seats and everything else, they might just be asked to take games to other stadiums and make some money.

As usual, sokka and its fans will kill the game in this country but they'll always have the anti sokka media to blame for their own anti social behaviour. Fucking cavemen.