Talking Footy

NlolRL wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 6:46 pm

And ive answered you again and again. Ratings companies release basic ratings reports. They dont analyse their meaning. So there is nothing to prove.

Now, tell me how my view is incorrect

You're hilarious. They don't analyse reports......but you do.....lololololololololol. So now we have TV analyst lolllller!!!! You and Denis Denuto could start up a company - "It's the Vibe......Just the vibe".....lololololololololol.

And still you refuse to discuss AFL 2017 v AFL 2018. Come on pal....man up, why the massive drop off????

NlolRL wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 3:48 pm

That's the whole point! With cumulative ratings 6 hours of NRL at 300k ratings per game equals 900k total. Yet 6 hours of AFL at 300k per game equals only 600k, despite the fact the same sized audience watched both sports over the same amount of time. Cumulative totals are totally misleading when used without any context of length of time.

Your ratings each round have nothing to do with time . There about the ratings for the round. 9 matches for you and 8 matches for us(well, 71/2 as NZ aren't counted).


Time is not a factor . This is just another of your crack-pot theories that means absolutely nothing.

You can't fix stupid

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 6:57 pm

You can't fix stupid

True!! It's kinda funny all the fumblers here except llolller have hightailed it to the jungle - maybe they sniffed the breeze & knew what was coming.

And as it is now not even Wookie or Beatup are defending the AFL's massive drop off this year. No wonder lllolller has locked himself away in his laboratory & is coming up with mad hatter theories.

Yep. There's no fixing stupid!!!

pussycat wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 6:56 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 3:48 pm

That's the whole point! With cumulative ratings 6 hours of NRL at 300k ratings per game equals 900k total. Yet 6 hours of AFL at 300k per game equals only 600k, despite the fact the same sized audience watched both sports over the same amount of time. Cumulative totals are totally misleading when used without any context of length of time.

Your ratings each round have nothing to do with time . There about the ratings for the round. 9 matches for you and 8 matches for us(well, 71/2 as NZ aren't counted).


Time is not a factor . This is just another of your crack-pot theories that means absolutely nothing.

of course time is a factor. To get the same ratings figures AFL fans have to watch 50% more time than NRL fans. If a program is watched more it is also watched longer

Terry wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 6:54 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 6:46 pm

And ive answered you again and again. Ratings companies release basic ratings reports. They dont analyse their meaning. So there is nothing to prove.

Now, tell me how my view is incorrect

You're hilarious. They don't analyse reports......but you do.....lololololololololol. So now we have TV analyst lolllller!!!! You and Denis Denuto could start up a company - "It's the Vibe......Just the vibe".....lololololololololol.

And still you refuse to discuss AFL 2017 v AFL 2018. Come on pal....man up, why the massive drop off????

You must be blind

NlolRL wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 10:23 pm

pussycat wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 6:56 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 3:48 pm

That's the whole point! With cumulative ratings 6 hours of NRL at 300k ratings per game equals 900k total. Yet 6 hours of AFL at 300k per game equals only 600k, despite the fact the same sized audience watched both sports over the same amount of time. Cumulative totals are totally misleading when used without any context of length of time.

Your ratings each round have nothing to do with time . There about the ratings for the round. 9 matches for you and 8 matches for us(well, 71/2 as NZ aren't counted).


Time is not a factor . This is just another of your crack-pot theories that means absolutely nothing.

of course time is a factor. To get the same ratings figures AFL fans have to watch 50% more time than NRL fans. If a program is watched more it is also watched longer

would an increase in broadband speed have much affect upon ratings?

pussycat wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 9:07 am

NlolRL wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 10:23 pm

pussycat wrote: Tue May 15, 2018 6:56 pm

Your ratings each round have nothing to do with time . There about the ratings for the round. 9 matches for you and 8 matches for us(well, 71/2 as NZ aren't counted).


Time is not a factor . This is just another of your crack-pot theories that means absolutely nothing.

of course time is a factor. To get the same ratings figures AFL fans have to watch 50% more time than NRL fans. If a program is watched more it is also watched longer

would an increase in broadband speed have much affect upon ratings?

here is the perfect example that none of you can answer

500k people who watch 6 hours of NRL counts as 1500k ratings
500k people who watch 6 hours of AFL counts as only 1000k ratings

Yet which sport is more watched over those 6 hours?

Forget about all your stupid excuses. Will even one of you discuss the above example?

seeming that we seem to be talking so much about hours the codes provide of late>>

how the hell did NRL get 2 billion over 5 years
and AFL get 2.5 billion over 6 years

when AFL absolutely smashes the NRL in hours per season>>

makes the NRL deal stunning considering the negatives it faces

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 10:52 am

seeming that we seem to be talking so much about hours the codes provide of late>>

how the hell did NRL get 2 billion over 5 years
and AFL get 2.5 billion over 6 years

when AFL absolutely smashes the NRL in hours per season>>

makes the NRL deal stunning considering the negatives it faces

Another who wont answer this simple question.

Is it really that hard??

What are you on about pal??? You're still hiding in the bushes too scared to answer the AFL 2017 v AFL 2018 tv ratings question.

Which while I'm on it: Wookie has confirmed on his other site that AFL on Fox is down 13% this year. When pushed he reluctantly admitted FTA is down 18%........yep........that's 18%. If you take out the 2 weeks of the Comm games it is still down 13%.

Any comments pal?? By anyone's reckoning these are massive drop off's - hundreds of thousands of viewers each & every week. Grow a set of kahuna's pal and answer this simple question: Why the catastrophic drop off??

Terry wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 11:30 am

What are you on about pal??? You're still hiding in the bushes too scared to answer the AFL 2017 v AFL 2018 tv ratings question.

Which while I'm on it: Wookie has confirmed on his other site that AFL on Fox is down 13% this year. When pushed he reluctantly admitted FTA is down 18%........yep........that's 18%. If you take out the 2 weeks of the Comm games it is still down 13%.

Any comments pal?? By anyone's reckoning these are massive drop off's - hundreds of thousands of viewers each & every week. Grow a set of kahuna's pal and answer this simple question: Why the catastrophic drop off??

You are bling. I discussed that issue days ago

NlolRL wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 11:22 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 10:52 am

seeming that we seem to be talking so much about hours the codes provide of late>>

how the hell did NRL get 2 billion over 5 years
and AFL get 2.5 billion over 6 years

when AFL absolutely smashes the NRL in hours per season>>

makes the NRL deal stunning considering the negatives it faces

Another who wont answer this simple question.

Is it really that hard??

which question?
quote me in it and I will answer it

Ill answer .
That's not how it works
The ratings are for the game .
Do viewers switch off after 2 hrs ( lol they should ..an AFL game is usually just about over by HT.)

No it's the whole game .
It's how ratings are measured .
You just can't accept that .
You're the only nutjob who keeps ranting about the 1.5 x theory .
It's not I repeat .its NOT how ratings work .

NlolRL wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 11:48 am

Terry wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 11:30 am

What are you on about pal??? You're still hiding in the bushes too scared to answer the AFL 2017 v AFL 2018 tv ratings question.

Which while I'm on it: Wookie has confirmed on his other site that AFL on Fox is down 13% this year. When pushed he reluctantly admitted FTA is down 18%........yep........that's 18%. If you take out the 2 weeks of the Comm games it is still down 13%.

Any comments pal?? By anyone's reckoning these are massive drop off's - hundreds of thousands of viewers each & every week. Grow a set of kahuna's pal and answer this simple question: Why the catastrophic drop off??

You are bling. I discussed that issue days ago

This is how you 'discussed' it on the NRL ratings thread:

"You really think im going to attempt a serious discussion on why our ratings are down on here? Hahahahaha"

"thanks for proving my point. There's no way you clowns are mature enough to enter a discussion like this, hence I wont even bother"

So......you've discussed how you won't discuss it lolololololol!!!!!!! You've hoisted the white flag......thrown in the towel.....hightailed it to the jungle......run for ya life lolololololol!!!!!!!

You spend hours, days, weeks, months, years filling threads with your mad theories over and over and over again trying to tell us why AFL ratings are actually more than what are published.

Yet when you get a direct AFL v AFL comparison you refuse to discusss it.

There are none so blind as those who refuse to see lolololololololol!!!!!!!

You may as well move on pal. You're done!!!!!