Page 15 of 16
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:41 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:THE SYDNEY Swans have capped off their 2012 premiership success with an annual financial profit of $207,007.
3.2 Million less then the Raiders ..............

Even with the Arse Raiders fuck all expenditure, the pathetic team still made a $200,000 loss.
Congratulations to Sydney for making a profit in "rl heartland" =D> Probably the only NSW club to do so hey?
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:28 am
by piesman2011
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:48 am
by eelofwest
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:
For starters, BS
Secondly, saving money isn't the game Dave

losing it aint either d head ... just ask poort snortelaide
& the Swines are 3.2 Million closer to a loss .. then the Raiders were
F me .... the Storm probably did better then a 200K profit ....

storm losing 13 mil a year?
The swans made a profit, more than can be said for 15 NRL teams

Xman like i said they day you back your bogus claims is the day of Christ second coming.....
Any links to this 13m loss from the storm?
The biggest losses from any clubs in Australian sport are coming from AFL please prove me wrong Xman....

Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:52 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:
For starters, BS
Secondly, saving money isn't the game Dave

losing it aint either d head ... just ask poort snortelaide
& the Swines are 3.2 Million closer to a loss .. then the Raiders were
F me .... the Storm probably did better then a 200K profit ....

storm losing 13 mil a year?
The swans made a profit, more than can be said for 15 NRL teams

so you're applying profits .... tiny profits .. from this year that VFL sides make .. against a rumor from 2 years ago that 15 NRL sides made losses that year
long bow drawn eh
we know many NRL sides have their miniscule losses covered by their leagues clubs , ... so technically they all finish even , or in the case of the raiders .. who own their licensed operations so own their profits if they make them .... finish well in front
gee .. wouldn't about 9 VFL clubs like to be able to say that
alas they can't
& further in to debt they go

Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:53 am
by Xman
Well show us their financial results this year Dave ...
The NRL teams have made losses for years except the broncos. But show us any annual reports that show otherwise Dave...
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:56 am
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:THE SYDNEY Swans have capped off their 2012 premiership success with an annual financial profit of $207,007.
3.2 Million less then the Raiders ..............

Even with the Arse Raiders fuck all expenditure, the pathetic team still made a $200,000 loss.
Congratulations to Sydney for making a profit in "rl heartland" =D> Probably the only NSW club to do so hey?
Raiders
61 Million in income ..... 57.6 Million spent
Verypoort Pennylesselaide
30 Million in income .... 36.3 Million spent

Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:59 am
by Xman
With pleasure
The post was to Dave too. I showed him the link in another thread only a few days ago. Funny how he hasnt commented on it.
NEWS Ltd last night promised to keep the Melbourne Storm going, despite having already committed a massive $66 million during the period of the salary cap rort.
During the five years since the start of the $1.7 million rort, News Ltd, publisher of the Herald Sun, injected a total of $65.9 million into the NRL outpost.
The figures are tallied in the Storm's annual reports between 2005 and 2009, which also reveal the club received $1.2 million in government grants over the same period.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/news- ... 5858136152
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:59 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:
Even with the Arse Raiders fuck all expenditure, the pathetic team still made a $200,000 loss.
Congratulations to Sydney for making a profit in "rl heartland" =D> Probably the only NSW club to do so hey?
Raiders
61 Million in income ..... 57.6 Million spent
Verypoort Pennylesselaide
30 Million in income .... 36.3 Million spent

Bs
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:00 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Well show us their financial results this year Dave ...
how bout you provide the financial results for the Thuns & Midgets

Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:08 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:With pleasure
The post was to Dave too. I showed him the link in another thread only a few days ago. Funny how he hasnt commented on it.
NEWS Ltd last night promised to keep the Melbourne Storm going, despite having already committed a massive $66 million during the period of the salary cap rort.
During the five years since the start of the $1.7 million rort, News Ltd, publisher of the Herald Sun, injected a total of $65.9 million into the NRL outpost.
The figures are tallied in the Storm's annual reports between 2005 and 2009, which also reveal the club received $1.2 million in government grants over the same period.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/news- ... 5858136152
this again
so what .... they own the Storm you biltering half wit
thats like saying Nathan Tinkler has put 40 Million into the Knights in the last 3 years
Of course he has .... his company..HSG Owns the Knights
or the Canberra Raiders PTY LTD .... has put 65 Million into the Raiders Football opertaion in the last 5 years
yep ....thats how a business works...
One side of it is expenditure
of course theres no mention of income for the Storm in this 5 year period ... which no doubt .. would have been about 65 Million as well
seriously
you would be the 2nd dumbest f.uck on these pages marcus .... behind that dimwit spewie
& you seem to be getting .. dumber

Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:16 am
by Raiderdave
eelofwest wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
losing it aint either d head ... just ask poort snortelaide
& the Swines are 3.2 Million closer to a loss .. then the Raiders were
F me .... the Storm probably did better then a 200K profit ....

storm losing 13 mil a year?
The swans made a profit, more than can be said for 15 NRL teams

Xman like i said they day you back your bogus claims is the day of Christ second coming.....
Any links to this 13m loss from the storm?
The biggest losses from any clubs in Australian sport are coming from AFL please prove me wrong Xman....

he is a very confused lil chap is marcus
he thinks expenditure ... is a loss
he forgets the other side of it ... income ... generates either a profit or a loss
the Storm have finished about even ... & in some cases posted small profits since about 2006
marcus is a bilthering knob who has ZERO understanding of finance
end of

Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:12 pm
by piesman2011
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:14 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:With pleasure
The post was to Dave too. I showed him the link in another thread only a few days ago. Funny how he hasnt commented on it.
NEWS Ltd last night promised to keep the Melbourne Storm going, despite having already committed a massive $66 million during the period of the salary cap rort.
During the five years since the start of the $1.7 million rort, News Ltd, publisher of the Herald Sun, injected a total of $65.9 million into the NRL outpost.
The figures are tallied in the Storm's annual reports between 2005 and 2009, which also reveal the club received $1.2 million in government grants over the same period.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/news- ... 5858136152
this again
so what .... they own the Storm you biltering half wit
thats like saying Nathan Tinkler has put 40 Million into the Knights in the last 3 years
Of course he has .... his company..HSG Owns the Knights
or the Canberra Raiders PTY LTD .... has put 65 Million into the Raiders Football opertaion in the last 5 years
yep ....thats how a business works...
One side of it is expenditure
of course theres no mention of income for the Storm in this 5 year period ... which no doubt .. would have been about 65 Million as well
seriously
you would be the 2nd dumbest f.uck on these pages marcus .... behind that dimwit spewie
& you seem to be getting .. dumber

The fact is without news ltd the storm would be 13 m behind each year, even after NRL grants. I think that got our entire comps losses covered
Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:41 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
this again
so what .... they own the Storm you biltering half wit
thats like saying Nathan Tinkler has put 40 Million into the Knights in the last 3 years
Of course he has .... his company..HSG Owns the Knights
or the Canberra Raiders PTY LTD .... has put 65 Million into the Raiders Football opertaion in the last 5 years
yep ....thats how a business works...
One side of it is expenditure
of course theres no mention of income for the Storm in this 5 year period ... which no doubt .. would have been about 65 Million as well
seriously
you would be the 2nd dumbest f.uck on these pages marcus .... behind that dimwit spewie
& you seem to be getting .. dumber

The fact is without news ltd the storm would be 13 m behind each year, even after NRL grants. I think that got our entire comps losses covered
the 65 Million is ... their expenditure & nothing more
they don't make a loss on this because their income .. is the same
the article doesn't say they LOST .. a cent
probably because they didn't
meanwhile VFL clubs were carrying 45 million of debt into season 2012
& we have Pooooorrr oh so Poort Twinkleyes with a 6.3 Million loss .... the Paddle pop wions with another 2.6 Million
the Thuns & Midgets probably another 9 Million down the shitter between them
that debts grown to 63 Million plus
VFL.... failing

Re: AFL V NRL Financial positioning
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:05 pm
by Xman
So they spent 63m of their own money for fun?
They need propping up to the tune of 63m dollars. Their revenue generated yearly without their owners funding is 13m short. Without it they would be that far in debt or far more likely extinct.
Debt isnt an issue if you make the payments Dave

you think Collingwood built a multi million dollar training facility for nothin?
