Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

And the winner is AFL! 2015
Revenue AFL
Largest crowd AFL
Most attendances AFL
Largest average crowd per match AFL
Largest sponsorship AFL
Most members AFL
Greatest participation. AFL

Yep make that an overwhelming victory to the AFL. NRL now behind Soccer and RU in many of these categories eh Pussycat - but by all means quote the one thing that is an estimate only AND fans don't have to pay for! Hahaha loser!

Enjoy dominating 4 little states in the only country on earth yr bumbling abortion is played

Vflol
Worlds tiniest sport :_<>

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol x 1000000000000
You fail at comprehension yet again .
& basic English .

Firstly ..
The media companies are not outplaying billions on buying or supplying ratings boxes .
They outlay billions on the results that the boxes provide .
Lol you're thick
This is what I posted



Media companies outlay billions using the info off the ratings boxes .
So many Lols



Now for your 2nd mistake .
You claimed there are 4800 thousand
Which equals

4,800,000

Make up your mind .

Or get someone with the IQ above that of a houseplant to check your post before you submit it .

well you obviously wouldn't be one

the TV companies when choosing to give out those rating boxes complete surveys then choose to distribute the rating boxes to which ever basement dwelling looser that watches the most TV during the week, so then the TV companies can then go to the advertisers & claim we have so many hundred thousand people watch out network,

ya gotta love how the ratings work for the NRLOL, apparently so many people watch it, yet they are never to be seen at games, their non broadcast revenue is pathetic & sponsorship levels are behind the AFL

so keep living in your little bubble spazza

Wot??
No mention of the Storms leagues club.. or
Pokes pokes
Gimmick
Gimmick


Lift your game metho spambot
Lift yr game

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

And the winner is AFL! 2015
Revenue AFL
Largest crowd AFL
Most attendances AFL
Largest average crowd per match AFL
Largest sponsorship AFL
Most members AFL
Greatest participation. AFL

Yep make that an overwhelming victory to the AFL. NRL now behind Soccer and RU in many of these categories eh Pussycat - but by all means quote the one thing that is an estimate only AND fans don't have to pay for! Hahaha loser!

Enjoy dominating 4 little states in the only country on earth yr bumbling abortion is played

Vflol
Worlds tiniest sport :_<>

yet those sponsorship figurw
Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 millio
the NRLOL all the way at number 4
all those little internationals, the kangawhos, playing against a bunch of minnows topped up by NRLOL players
aint bringing in the sponsorship
the SOO state vs state gimmisk, included and the NRLOL still come number 4


NRL= worthless pile of shit

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol x 1000000000000
You fail at comprehension yet again .
& basic English .

Firstly ..
The media companies are not outplaying billions on buying or supplying ratings boxes .
They outlay billions on the results that the boxes provide .
Lol you're thick
This is what I posted



Media companies outlay billions using the info off the ratings boxes .
So many Lols



Now for your 2nd mistake .
You claimed there are 4800 thousand
Which equals

4,800,000

Make up your mind .

Or get someone with the IQ above that of a houseplant to check your post before you submit it .

well you obviously wouldn't be one

the TV companies when choosing to give out those rating boxes complete surveys then choose to distribute the rating boxes to which ever basement dwelling looser that watches the most TV during the week, so then the TV companies can then go to the advertisers & claim we have so many hundred thousand people watch out network,

ya gotta love how the ratings work for the NRLOL, apparently so many people watch it, yet they are never to be seen at games, their non broadcast revenue is pathetic & sponsorship levels are behind the AFL

so keep living in your little bubble spazza

Firstly why did you ignore your 4800 thousand claim you made .
Once again shown up as an idiot ,then ignore what you posted .

Secondly what planet are you on .

Your theory is laughable .
According to you .
Tv stations hand out ratings boxers to select people .
Knowing that they will watch certain programs .
Then try to leverage advertising dollars off companies with these fake numbers .

Here's where your theory is as about as relevant as all your other bizarre claims .

So once a tv channel has put out fake ratings to show how popular a program or sport is ,they then have to fork out hundreds of millions of dollars to buy the rights to that sport .
Why would they artificially inflate the popularity of a sport when it will drive the price up ?
According to you they are paying big overs for something they know doesn't rate well ,but they lied about that so they could outlay far more than it's worth .
You sir are fucked in the head

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

And the winner is AFL! 2015
Revenue AFL
Largest crowd AFL
Most attendances AFL
Largest average crowd per match AFL
Largest sponsorship AFL
Most members AFL
Greatest participation. AFL

Yep make that an overwhelming victory to the AFL. NRL now behind Soccer and RU in many of these categories eh Pussycat - but by all means quote the one thing that is an estimate only AND fans don't have to pay for! Hahaha loser!

Enjoy dominating 4 little states in the only country on earth yr bumbling abortion is played

Vflol
Worlds tiniest sport :_<>

Yeah couldn't care less bubbler boy - my Swans more than dominate the Sydney landscape with their massive crowds, massive membership and huge football related revenues!!!!! But I guess being the number one code in PNG is a huge achievement for RL given the Swans annual budget is more than that leagues entire budget including the clubs combined! Hahaha oh bubbler boy!

At halfway mark of season, Nine's LIVE Sunday Arvo #NRL metro avg up HUGE +17% on same time last yr, incl +21% in SYD.

=D> =D> =D> Wow =D> =D>

At halfway mark of season, Nine's LIVE FRI Night #NRL metro avg SYD +4% & MEL +13%.

=D> =D> =D> Wow =D> =D>

Yet they are down in crowds, membership, sponsorship and revenue! Proves only one thing that RL supporters only support things that are free! Obviously on the dole!

Membership down .

I don't think so .
Another porky told by a fumbler ..lol how strange .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Membership down .

I don't think so .
Another porky told by a fumbler ..lol how strange .

By fumbler spazza means nrlol fan

Stick to the topic dumbo .

Says the master of defection.
The nrlol mob are fumblers a tap on from a 4 meter throw? If that's not fumbling what is!

But yeah back in memberships
Isn't it funny how the afl sells 3 memberships to the nrlols 1

The Age
" The Swans membership of 31,866 includes fewer than 20,000 of the old-fashioned member types with more than 7000 Sydney fans having three-game memberships. North Melbourne have only about 8000 11-game members.

Geelong also added three-game memberships this year and more than 1000 Cats fans have taken them up. In addition, the Cats offer Melbourne four-game and country five-game memberships, which count towards their overall tally.

Within football there are whispers about some clubs offering memberships to sponsors in contra deals that beef up membership figures artificially. Collingwood is the example given most frequently, with representatives of three clubs suggesting the Magpies had given away significant numbers of three-game memberships to Westpac staff as part of a new naming rights sponsorship for their Swan Street training base.

''It's pretty shameless the way they've done it,'' one club official said. ''I'd be surprised if they are the only ones but the scale of it is impressive.'' A top man from another club agreed: "It's not unusual. A lot of clubs are doing it and the benefits are obvious," he said. ''We don't run around like some clubs handing out a thousand memberships to sponsors here and there."

Collingwood admitted to The Age that memberships were included in the Westpac deal but would not say how many."




http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... -v4od.html

pussycat wrote:

The Age
" The Swans membership of 31,866 includes fewer than 20,000 of the old-fashioned member types with more than 7000 Sydney fans having three-game memberships. North Melbourne have only about 8000 11-game members.

Geelong also added three-game memberships this year and more than 1000 Cats fans have taken them up. In addition, the Cats offer Melbourne four-game and country five-game memberships, which count towards their overall tally.

Within football there are whispers about some clubs offering memberships to sponsors in contra deals that beef up membership figures artificially. Collingwood is the example given most frequently, with representatives of three clubs suggesting the Magpies had given away significant numbers of three-game memberships to Westpac staff as part of a new naming rights sponsorship for their Swan Street training base.

''It's pretty shameless the way they've done it,'' one club official said. ''I'd be surprised if they are the only ones but the scale of it is impressive.'' A top man from another club agreed: "It's not unusual. A lot of clubs are doing it and the benefits are obvious," he said. ''We don't run around like some clubs handing out a thousand memberships to sponsors here and there."

Collingwood admitted to The Age that memberships were included in the Westpac deal but would not say how many."




http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... -v4od.html

welcome to 5 years ago

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Stick to the topic dumbo .

I'll take that criticism from most! But from you
LOL!!!!!!