Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Don't like the truth Fwed??????? Do tell pal. What's ya beef????Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Yep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Ah beatup.......a dill to the end llololololololol!!!Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pmYep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies
Yes, well I thought States had nothing to do as to what is televised and pretty sure the anti-syphoning laws were a Federal thing (are they still in place?)?Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pmYep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies
Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pmYep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies
Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:00 pmYes, well I thought States had nothing to do as to what is televised and pretty sure the anti-syphoning laws were a Federal thing (are they still in place?)?Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pmYep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies
Any news on who wrote that article - it had all the hallmarks of a jealous Roy Masters clutching at straws as usual. I think he thinks more about the AFL than RL. He'd do well on this forum with the other NRL nuffies.
Lololololololol!!!!!! Hilarious stuff beatup lololol!! Pal, the AFL put it out there that Ten/Paramount offered 'em $600M. A massive increase on the current deal. Something they would have absolutely taken had it been true.Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pmYep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pmWho wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?
Are tv licenses a state thing ?
The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies