Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Fred · Post by **Fred** » Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm

Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?

Terry · Post by **Terry** » Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:01 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?

Don't like the truth Fwed??????? Do tell pal. What's ya beef????

Post by **Beaussie** » Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?

Yep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.

The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies

Terry · Post by **Terry** » Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:05 pm

Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Yep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.

The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies

Ah beatup.......a dill to the end llololololololol!!!

Fred · Post by **Fred** » Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:00 pm

Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Yep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.

The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies

Yes, well I thought States had nothing to do as to what is televised and pretty sure the anti-syphoning laws were a Federal thing (are they still in place?)?

Any news on who wrote that article - it had all the hallmarks of a jealous Roy Masters clutching at straws as usual. I think he thinks more about the AFL than RL. He'd do well on this forum with the other NRL nuffies.

truthbomber · Post by **truthbomber** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 6:36 am

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?

the forum court jester has arrived

fucking clown

truthbomber · Post by **truthbomber** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 6:42 am

Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Yep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.

The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies

having to pay more ?
Its quite obvious from the article that they aren't going to pay much more ... if anymore at all you fumbling wanker because

guess what ?

THEY DON"T NEED TO

there is no one else in the race for the rights .........
never was

As you were told from the bomber of truth ....moi $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$ $:\:$

bye bye big increase

bye bye

truthbomber · Post by **truthbomber** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 6:44 am

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:00 pm

Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Yep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.

The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies
Yes, well I thought States had nothing to do as to what is televised and pretty sure the anti-syphoning laws were a Federal thing (are they still in place?)?

Any news on who wrote that article - it had all the hallmarks of a jealous Roy Masters clutching at straws as usual. I think he thinks more about the AFL than RL. He'd do well on this forum with the other NRL nuffies.

deluded ******

truthbomber · Post by **truthbomber** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 7:00 am

the articles claiming a 3 billion deal on the table from paramount / 10 didn't make any sense , like they were bizarre & the leaguies on here questioned them quite rightly

Why in the name of jesus was the aflol still negotiating with anyone else if there was a 600 mill pa deal on the table ?

I'll tell you why ..
there is no deal from paramount /10 & there never was ... as we leaguies have been saying.
the aflol lied to its
broadcast partners
its clubs
its fans

what a disgraceful organisation

fumblers wonder why the aflol has a reputation by fans of other sports as being full of charlatans & snake oil salesmen

bye bye big increase

bye bye

Post by leeroy*NRL* » Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:50 am

interesting times, from previous AFL deals this has definitely been more different in many ways.

also got to remember, previous AFL DEAL was 6 years and NRL 5 years.

Be interesting how long the AFL go for length of deal.

Post by leeroy*NRL* » Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:53 am

also club presidents & AFL are set to decide in MID August about Tasmania.

this will have ramifications on TV DEAL you would think..

i would say, at current
CH7 AND FOX have an offer on table
AFL want more $$

Fred · Post by **Fred** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:26 pm

Will just have to wait and see I guess Leroy - don't see a 19th license before 2030 in reality.

Terry · Post by **Terry** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 3:54 pm

Beaussie wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:02 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:28 pm
Who wrote this? Reads like a Roy Masters piece ?

Are tv licenses a state thing ?
Yep, bitter News Ltd just upset they will need to pay more to beat the Channel 10/Paramount+ bid.

The paragraph confusing state and federal politics was laughable. News Ltd lies

Lololololololol!!!!!! Hilarious stuff beatup lololol!! Pal, the AFL put it out there that Ten/Paramount offered 'em $600M. A massive increase on the current deal. Something they would have absolutely taken had it been true.

They are now talking to Seven and Fox only. They are begging them for more money. Ten/Paramount are out of the picture. There is only one reason why.......there never was an offer!! It was a lie lololl!!

This truly is hilarious stuff. Gilty and the boyos have given themselves a massive uppercut lololol!! They now look like what they are.....clowns!!!!!

truthbomber · Post by **truthbomber** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 6:30 pm

staggering delusions from the fumblers
they simply can't help themselves lol

pussycat Mark 11 · Post by **pussycat Mark 11** » Tue Jul 26, 2022 6:54 pm

Seems Gil will get The send off he deserves

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Who is online