Page 14 of 16

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:25 pm
by pHyR3
hey wow, on the right hand side it is cut off but clearly it says "rugby league" and lists their pool below it. that's even more amazing! i thought it was just a headline on the news reel but i think they are actually discussing it. Even if theyre not it doesnt matter, 1/4 of the screen dedicated to RL on USA national TV.

we told you excitement would build ahead of their clash with Oz.

you can yawn all you want, but then again i guess ignorance is bliss.

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:57 pm
by Swans4ever
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Just seen this pic posted at the raah from one of their big fox sports news show.

Image

Small steps eh?

:D
Wait till they find out all the players are Australian!

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:05 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
pHyR3 wrote:
hey wow, on the right hand side it is cut off but clearly it says "rugby league" and lists their pool below it. that's even more amazing! i thought it was just a headline on the news reel but i think they are actually discussing it. Even if theyre not it doesnt matter, 1/4 of the screen dedicated to RL on USA national TV.

we told you excitement would build ahead of their clash with Oz.

you can yawn all you want, but then again i guess ignorance is bliss.

Yeah the fella who posted it said they were talking about it.

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 6:30 am
by Swans4ever
:thumbleft: SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game :thumbleft:
:drunk: :\: :_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 7:25 am
by Xman
Swans4ever wrote:
:thumbleft: SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game :thumbleft:
:drunk: :\: :_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Agree, that's not a good look for a WC

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:27 am
by NRLCrap1
Raiderdave wrote:
this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

it is almost as pathetic

as it is hilarious :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:02 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
:thumbleft: SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game :thumbleft:
:drunk: :\: :_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Agree, that's not a good look for a WC
how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ? :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<>



New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04


Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24

England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02


New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15


New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:09 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
:thumbleft: SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game :thumbleft:
:drunk: :\: :_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Agree, that's not a good look for a WC
how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ? :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<>



New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04


Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24

England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02


New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15


New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14
No better. What's your point? :?>

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:17 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

it is almost as pathetic

as it is hilarious :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!

& yet :-k
in everyone of these places ...... these people are considered more interesting then your bumbling crap sport :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Image

that sorta puts it in perspective don't ya think fuckhead :wink:

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:21 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
:thumbleft: SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game :thumbleft:
:drunk: :\: :_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Agree, that's not a good look for a WC
how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ? :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<>



New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04


Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24

England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02


New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15


New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14
No better. What's your point? :?>
well its maybe ... big scores occur in many world cups & they don't seem to be concerned about it being a bad look
big nations
& minnows play in world cups

maybe when you lot get to have a proper one .... you'll see :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:22 pm
by Swans4ever
:cheers:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
:thumbleft: SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game :thumbleft:
:drunk: :\: :_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Agree, that's not a good look for a WC
how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ? :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<>



New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04


Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24

England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02


New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15


New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14
Yeah and only ONE of those sides are playing in the RLWC!

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:39 pm
by NRLCrap1
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

it is almost as pathetic

as it is hilarious :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!

& yet :-k
in everyone of these places ...... these people are considered more interesting then your bumbling crap sport :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Image

that sorta puts it in perspective don't ya think fuckhead :wink:
No it doesn't because AFL beats them in the ratings everywhere in Australia, and probably in NZ, PNG and Nauru as well!

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:44 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

it is almost as pathetic

as it is hilarious :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!

& yet :-k
in everyone of these places ...... these people are considered more interesting then your bumbling crap sport :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Image

that sorta puts it in perspective don't ya think fuckhead :wink:
No it doesn't because AFL beats them in the ratings everywhere in Australia, and probably in NZ, PNG and Nauru as well!
He has to be a RL troll trying to make derpball fans look dumber than usual(a very big ask)
No one is this dumb ,has to be trolling.

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:46 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
:thumbleft: SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game :thumbleft:
:drunk: :\: :_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Agree, that's not a good look for a WC
how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ? :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<>



New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04


Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24

England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02


New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15


New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14
No better. What's your point? :?>
well its maybe ... big scores occur in many world cups & they don't seem to be concerned about it being a bad look
big nations
& minnows play in world cups

maybe when you lot get to have a proper one .... you'll see :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
I suppose it depends how deep into the tournament these one sided games occur

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:17 pm
by pHyR3
that's true, i expect the semis to be competitive. but hey, blowouts can happen at any time. Like the NRL GF a few years ago 40-0 manly vs storm from memory.

the RLWC is about promoting the game internationally which will result in increased funding, a nice 5-10 mil profit, and more awareness/participation, ESPECIALLY in europe which is where it's focused. The next frontier for RL must be NZ and France. Another French team in the SL and another NRL team in NZ within 10 years. The U20s warriors side is overflowing with talent, they've won the comp twice in i think 5 or 6 years (only started a few years ago) and made the GF this year too.

Then we can focus on expanding further into Europe and America maybe with a RLWC in Canada/USA in 10-20 years.