Is The AFL Racist?
-
- Captain
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:39 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location: AFL Death Star Melbourne
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
Who cares about Islanders? this is Australia not some third world sinking Pacific Island dump!
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
Ah well you basically did...Xman wrote:I never said that you great twat!King-Eliagh wrote:So Xman you think the game (of marngrook) is not suited to the physiques of islanders? A simple enough reason but I wouldnt be pushing it. Islanders aren't all the one shape you know and there's plenty of positions in marngrook in which a big frame is an advantage. We also must remember that Pacific Islanders living in Australia are integrating into a new country and picking up different customs as they integrate. Diets change when people move country, as do recreational interests such as sport. The AFL would be best to heed my words here rather than Xman's narrow ones and aim for a more ethnically diverse code, like RL.
Xman wrote:The only reason the NRL have a different makeup (to the AFL) is the game is well suited to the physique of players from the pacific island region.



xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
But he NEVER said that they weren't suited to AFL, you idiot!! Your ignorance is more petulant than anything in this forum!
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
TLPG wrote:But he NEVER said that they weren't suited to AFL, you idiot!! Your ignorance is more petulant than anything in this forum!
Yawn.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
You find the truth is boring? Why doesn't that surprise me?
Needed to be said.
Needed to be said.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
Not even close dunce! I said they were suited to RL, not that they were unsuited to ARs!King-Eliagh wrote:Ah well you basically did...Xman wrote:I never said that you great twat!King-Eliagh wrote:So Xman you think the game (of marngrook) is not suited to the physiques of islanders? A simple enough reason but I wouldnt be pushing it. Islanders aren't all the one shape you know and there's plenty of positions in marngrook in which a big frame is an advantage. We also must remember that Pacific Islanders living in Australia are integrating into a new country and picking up different customs as they integrate. Diets change when people move country, as do recreational interests such as sport. The AFL would be best to heed my words here rather than Xman's narrow ones and aim for a more ethnically diverse code, like RL.
Xman wrote:The only reason the NRL have a different makeup (to the AFL) is the game is well suited to the physique of players from the pacific island region.this is getting quite tiresome, teaching you petulant children


King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
So if they're not 'not suited' to marngrook then why is it that the...
I'm now confused. Are you then saying that the AFL is against recruiting pacific islander players or are you saying that pacific islanders are not suited to the AFL...it can only really be one of the two because we all agree there are diddly squat pacific islanders playing at the AFL level. So which one is it Xman?
You know you really are shooting yourself in the foot here.
Xman wrote:"only reason the NRL have a different ethnic makeup (to the AFL)is the game is well suited to the physique of players from the pacific island region.

I'm now confused. Are you then saying that the AFL is against recruiting pacific islander players or are you saying that pacific islanders are not suited to the AFL...it can only really be one of the two because we all agree there are diddly squat pacific islanders playing at the AFL level. So which one is it Xman?
You know you really are shooting yourself in the foot here.


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
He's saying that thugby is better suited to Pacific Islanders. Pacific Islanders can play footy as well. What do you think Israel Folau is? Chinese??
So who's shotting themselves in the foot? YOU!
So who's shotting themselves in the foot? YOU!
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location:
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
I would say that Aussie Rules is suited to a lot of different body types. I would say that RL is suited to less body types, however a common body type for RL (muscled and stocky) is also common in Polynesians. Just my opinion.
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
And a perfectly reasonable opinion. I quoted an article in this thread saying the NRL will soon see 50% of players from polynesian background. Yet this is an Australian competition.piesman2011 wrote:I would say that Aussie Rules is suited to a lot of different body types. I would say that RL is suited to less body types, however a common body type for RL (muscled and stocky) is also common in Polynesians. Just my opinion.

King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
Its an ethnically diverse competition Xman. And dont you go putting polynesians in the one box now, like you already have. They're a very diverse bunch they are too, representing numerous nations.
I'd disagree that RL is suited to less body types than marngrook. RL has a place for the ectomorphs, the sam backos, the blocka roaches. Marngrook doesnt really have a place for the 'big boned fatty' types which is a shame because it is great to see fat athletes i think.
I'd disagree that RL is suited to less body types than marngrook. RL has a place for the ectomorphs, the sam backos, the blocka roaches. Marngrook doesnt really have a place for the 'big boned fatty' types which is a shame because it is great to see fat athletes i think.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
King-Eliagh wrote:Its an ethnically diverse competition Xman. And dont you go putting polynesians in the one box now, like you already have. They're a very diverse bunch they are too, representing numerous nations.
I'd disagree that RL is suited to less body types than marngrook. RL has a place for the ectomorphs, the sam backos, the blocka roaches. Marngrook doesnt really have a place for the 'big boned fatty' types which is a shame because it is great to see fat athletes i think.
In the eyes of the best Aboriginal player, the AFL has racism problems, good on you Goddsie for shining light on a issue that must be fixed if the AFL are to even get close to scratching the surface of western Sydney..... :D
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6401729864
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
It is being fixed, Eel! Which is more than what the NRL is doing! It's a lot better in the AFL than it was - even Goodes will admit that. Of course it's still there. It's still there in every code and in every sport no matter what. The question here is not whether or not it's still there. The question here is who is doing more about it. If it's NRL v AFL it's an easy win for the AFL.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
Wrong!eelofwest wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:Its an ethnically diverse competition Xman. And dont you go putting polynesians in the one box now, like you already have. They're a very diverse bunch they are too, representing numerous nations.
I'd disagree that RL is suited to less body types than marngrook. RL has a place for the ectomorphs, the sam backos, the blocka roaches. Marngrook doesnt really have a place for the 'big boned fatty' types which is a shame because it is great to see fat athletes i think.
In the eyes of the best Aboriginal player, the AFL has racism problems, good on you Goddsie for shining light on a issue that must be fixed if the AFL are to even get close to scratching the surface of western Sydney..... :D
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6401729864
He said almost is not good enough but ....."the AFL and its indigenous players are "winning the war" against racism"
He never said it was a problem. He said its being addressed but there is some work still to go.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is The AFL Racist?
Dear God! Xman basically you're now suggesting that racism isnt a problem and that Goodes doesnt suggest its a problem either. Can you go much lower? I hope you watch this program tonight because you need to be learned.Xman wrote:Wrong!eelofwest wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:Its an ethnically diverse competition Xman. And dont you go putting polynesians in the one box now, like you already have. They're a very diverse bunch they are too, representing numerous nations.
I'd disagree that RL is suited to less body types than marngrook. RL has a place for the ectomorphs, the sam backos, the blocka roaches. Marngrook doesnt really have a place for the 'big boned fatty' types which is a shame because it is great to see fat athletes i think.
In the eyes of the best Aboriginal player, the AFL has racism problems, good on you Goddsie for shining light on a issue that must be fixed if the AFL are to even get close to scratching the surface of western Sydney..... :D
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6401729864
He said almost is not good enough but ....."the AFL and its indigenous players are "winning the war" against racism"
He never said it was a problem. He said its being addressed but there is some work still to go.


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?