Talking Footy

No, I won in all of them straight away, your absence when it comes to non bias is duly noted.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

No, I won in all of them straight away, your absence when it comes to non bias is duly noted.

So what are the numbers for international AFL? Fail 1

Why do you call ARs AFL if you think that only means the professional league? Fail 2

Why did you ask Beaussie about the RL Anzac day after his claim? Fail 3

I proved each and every one, it is you and your mates that have failed.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I proved each and every one, it is you and your mates that have failed.

So what are the AFL numbers? Don't avoid the question. Answer it.

You've certainly proven the Newcastle claim, by using the term AFL yourself!

Your sooking is getting a little old. Answer these points would be a good start for you.

ANZAC games, who played first and who copied the other?

Come on bs file experts, answer the phucking question.

3 points coming my way.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

ANZAC games, who played first and who copied the other?

Come on bs file experts, answer the phucking question.

Not relevant to beaussies claim

Beaussie is full of someones baloney, he had a pop at the whole sport and that has been proved time and time again.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Beaussie is full of someones baloney, he had a pop at the whole sport and that has been proved time and time again.

Interesting how you're claiming I am biased yet you are claiming a 3 - 0 victory!

Do you think you may be a bit bias?

Nope, I'm right, if I was wrong, I would admit it.

You see ex woman, I pick my BS files very carefully and fight on my terms.

Sooking parafeel ? or being delusional again.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I proved each and every one, it is you and your mates that have failed.

I have not been keeping a close eye on the other BS files but in this instance you've clearly failed to prove your point IMO. I say this, as what you've claimed is BS on my part, was not even said. You misinterpret alot of things others post I'm noticing. You oughta work on that one as you just look silly.

You tarred the whole code bearsey, your mistake so live with it.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You tarred the whole code bearsey, your mistake so live with it.

You took my comments out of context. Again, I was talking about which code was the first to have a game on ANZAC Day in Melbourne and who copied who. Was never about which code first played on ANZAC Day anywhere in Australia. You lose this one dopey.

Beaussie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You tarred the whole code bearsey, your mistake so live with it.

You took my comments out of context. Again, I was talking about which code was the first to have a game on ANZAC Day in Melbourne and who copied who. Was never about which code first played on ANZAC Day anywhere in Australia. You lose this one dopey.

Correct. it was Beaussie's comments that were challenged, not Para's. How Para interperates Beaussie's comments is irrelevant. Beaussie has explained the context of his claims and that explanation is reasonable and correct. Para has attempted to suggest the claim meant something entirely different which is not on.

Again, don't challenge on potentially ambiguos claims. If you are unsure ask for clarification of the claim before challenging. If Para has have asked if the claim referred to RL v AFL, and waited for an answer, his challenge would bemore convincing.