Page 14 of 852

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:53 am
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Lets see, last weeks ratings. The ratings that matter mosts to the tv networks. Total viewers for the respective codes last week (including PayTV capital/regional figures) are shown below. Absolute smashing victory for the AFL as you can see. Please note, the NRL has not once this season outrated the AFL. Same last season and the season before that, and the season before that, and the season before that. You get the picture.

Anyway, here are the figures from last week. Throwball fans, please feel free to point out any week (yeah even just one) where the NRL rated better than the AFL.

AFL
Round 17 - Total - 3,252,000


NRL
Round 19 - Total - 2,659,000

http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php
I'm looking at the Link
I don't see any regional figures for either code
FFS, no one cares about regionals. Why would anyone bother when they don't even count all markets. Very selective to suit an agenda if you get what I mean.

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:02 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Lets see, last weeks ratings. The ratings that matter mosts to the tv networks. Total viewers for the respective codes last week (including PayTV capital/regional figures) are shown below. Absolute smashing victory for the AFL as you can see. Please note, the NRL has not once this season outrated the AFL. Same last season and the season before that, and the season before that, and the season before that. You get the picture.

Anyway, here are the figures from last week. Throwball fans, please feel free to point out any week (yeah even just one) where the NRL rated better than the AFL.

AFL
Round 17 - Total - 3,252,000

they're not included though are they
we win
see ya :wink:


NRL
Round 19 - Total - 2,659,000

http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php
I'm looking at the Link
I don't see any regional figures for either code
FFS, no one cares about regionals. Why would anyone bother when they don't even count all markets. Very selective to suit an agenda if you get what I mean.
No you don't care about regionals cause they harm your lame argument
They aren't included in these figures.. they have to be to get a clearer picture
& when they are .. we win :cool:

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:17 am
by Onions
Nothing to say, Raider Boy? No more fucking delusion, hey?

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:23 am
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Try comparing apples with apples! Friday night we smashed you even without 30% of our audience =D> =D> =D>
That's not comparing apples with apples. Our Friday night game is delayed in all markets, some markets by up to 3-4hrs. Yours is live. That aside, we still smash you in the total viewers stakes each round of the season, each and every season. That's why our code is worth $1.235 Billion to the broadcasters and yours is worth a piddly $500 million. We achieved your current deal/figure 2 broadcast rights deals ago. 10 years ago in fact. That's how far behind and how big the gap actually is throwball fans. Reality is harsh isn't it. :<>

More like our 2nd tv match which was delayed a couple of hours in Sydney then :wink: we still smashed you :lol: :lol: :lol:

In the total viewers stakes we have just 3 matches on FTA. On Averages we win.

You seem to be negecting the fact that it takes neary 30 of your matches to pull the same ratings as our 3 origin games.

We've been working under constraints these past 15 or so years, but the Tv deal we got, prior to News Ltd coming on the scene was a record. And we had almost 90k to an Origin match in Melbourne.

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:00 pm
by Onions
Oh you're in fucking cloud cuckoo land like Raider Boy, Kitten! AFL fucking MURDERS NRL nationwide and State of Origin doesn't fucking count because it's NOT fucking club games!!

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:11 pm
by Raiderdave
Onions wrote:
Oh you're in ******* cloud cuckoo land like Raider Boy, Kitten! AFL ******* MURDERS NRL nationwide and State of Origin doesn't ******* count because it's NOT ******* club games!!
the only thing getting murdered on TV

is the AFL

by the NRL :wink:

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:56 pm
by Onions
Delusion alert!

The AFL is WINNING, fuck wit! Go fuck a horse!

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:10 pm
by pussycat
Do the sums, work out the averages and then tell us who's winning, you brain washed mushroom.

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:17 pm
by Raiderdave
pussycat wrote:
Do the sums, work out the averages and then tell us who's winning, you brain washed mushroom.
umm were this merkin is concerned pussycat ...
you have to have a brain for it to be washed :wink:

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:58 pm
by Onions
pussycat wrote:
Do the sums, work out the averages and then tell us who's winning, you brain washed mushroom.
TV or Live?

TV no one's winning because the figures are fucking incomplete and what's there is wrong anyway because of the double counting in the fucking overlaps.

Live AFL is winning. Fucking easy!

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:57 pm
by Dogs
Can you please confirm, is this thread purely NRL tv viewers v AFL viewer numbers, I say this as you AFL boys keep changing the goal posts?

If so when I get a chance, I will update some interesting figures. Onion please confirm if I am correct that the only figures you want to talk about is ozTAM 5 city counts?

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:36 pm
by King-Eliagh
Yes they do like changing the posts dont they now. :wink:

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:58 pm
by Onions
Dogs wrote:
Can you please confirm, is this thread purely NRL tv viewers v AFL viewer numbers, I say this as you AFL boys keep changing the goal posts?

If so when I get a chance, I will update some interesting figures. Onion please confirm if I am correct that the only figures you want to talk about is ozTAM 5 city counts?
I'd talk about ALL the fucking figures - if they existed!! They don't and that's the fucking point as well as the double counts being done on the fucking overlap that you refuse to admit happens!

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:06 pm
by Dogs
Onions wrote:
Dogs wrote:
Can you please confirm, is this thread purely NRL tv viewers v AFL viewer numbers, I say this as you AFL boys keep changing the goal posts?

If so when I get a chance, I will update some interesting figures. Onion please confirm if I am correct that the only figures you want to talk about is ozTAM 5 city counts?
I'd talk about ALL the ******* figures - if they existed!! They don't and that's the ******* point as well as the double counts being done on the ******* overlap that you refuse to admit happens!
Again avoiding the question.

Try I will try again. What figures or facts for the purpose of this thread are you suggesting we use. If you say there are none, then you are contricting your AFL buddy, Beaussie who started this blog with the figures from ozTAm to proove that AFL is watch more than NRL and you seem to be pretty supportive all through this thread on everything Beaussie says.

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:09 pm
by Beaussie
As the title of this thread suggest, it's Football TV ratings. Interpret that as being tv ratings for all the football codes Dogs.