Re: AFL vs NRL - Memberships
Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 8:57 pm
Dave and dead beat dad have made an art of deflection
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
nice to see all of that advertising, as often as a mcdonalds commercial from the NRL telling people to buy memberships is paying off.The_Wookie wrote:
whats this got to do with memberships dickhead?pussycat wrote:Carlton rakes in almost $20 million from poker machines
Grant Baker and Sam Edmund
Herald Sun
December 04, 2013 10:00PM
Carlton is reaping the benefits of 290 poker machines. Source: News Limited
CARLTON more than doubled its gaming-related revenue in 2013 to $19.7 million, the club's annual report reveals.
The jump in revenue - up from $9.5 million in 2012 - did not result in a large profit for the Blues this year, in part because of short-term costs associated with the club's increased investment in gaming.
The report notes that "member venue costs" jumped from $7.5 million to $17 million as the club recorded a $528,000 profit for the year ending October 31.
Gaming machine entitlements for 290 machines came into effect in August 2012, and the club will make payments on those entitlements over the next four years.
However, the entitlements do not expire until 2022 and it is expected Carlton will maximise its financial return from pokies in the final five years of the machines' 10-year lifespan.
Victorian AFL clubs own 18 gaming venues and 1317 machines, with North Melbourne the only club in the state not to make money out of gaming.
Carlton's $19.7 million in gaming revenue this year represents more than a third of its total revenue of $57 million.
According to the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation, poker machines owned by AFL clubs empty more than $85 million annually from the pockets of punters.
In February, the Western Bulldogs - who own 50 machines - floated in a discussion paper on equalisation the prospect of gaming revenue above a certain amount being split between clubs.
"The growth in scale of and dependency on poker machine revenue in AFL clubs, and growing revenue differentials between larger and smaller Victorian franchises in this area, have been to the detriment of the competition," the Bulldogs said.
"A system in which poker machine profits over a proportion of gross club revenue were contributed to a common pool for equitable distribution would be a preferable model of a 'luxury tax' and might have the additional benefit of reducing the incentive of clubs to increase their own dependence and their fans' exposure to poker machine use."
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/AFL/c ... 6775354170
AFLcrap1 wrote:Why the name change AdumbLiar?leagueiscrap wrote:the NRL clubs can have all the pokes they want, it still doesnt take away the fact the NRL clubs are worthless pieces of crap, struggle to be any where near what a small AFL club is worthRaiderdave wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:The_Wookie wrote:And yet the Football club itself had less than half the revenue of Collingwood when you remove Collingwoods gaming revenue.pussycat wrote:For the 2013 season the Penrith Panthers annual turnover almost doubled the AFL's wealthiest club - CollingwoodAdum wrote:why in their Annual report from 2013 they reported a revenue of 17,725,213 million
thats bigger than most NRL clubs total club revenue
Penrith District Rubgy League Football Club
- Revenue - $20.718 million
- Sponsorship - $5.428 million
- Gate reciepts - $1.6 million
- Merchandise - $341,000
Property Trust Income - $4.3 million
NRL Grant - $6.81 million.
Collingwood Football Club
- Revenue (without Gaming) $52.2 million ($75 million inc)
- Sponsorship $19.65 million
- match returns 1.83 million
- Membership $16.7 million
- AFL Distribution $12.56 million
to sum it up, the NRL teams are worthless pieces of shit.
if thats all the sponsors the NRL so called biggest team can attract.![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
don't you just love fumblers folks
they used to masturbate over their clubs overall revenues ( including gaming ) which was a significant % as well
then
when NRL fans pointed out that if you included their clubs gaming revenues they'd on average .... DOUBLE ... most VFL clubs overall revenues
they went
![]()
.... you can't do that !!
oh ... why ?>
ahhhhhhhhh![]()
lets just leave the gaming revenues out then cos we can't win otherwise![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
to it sum up
fumblers are cockheads
again virgin boy this is a membership thread.pussycat wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Why the name change AdumbLiar?leagueiscrap wrote:the NRL clubs can have all the pokes they want, it still doesnt take away the fact the NRL clubs are worthless pieces of crap, struggle to be any where near what a small AFL club is worthRaiderdave wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:The_Wookie wrote:And yet the Football club itself had less than half the revenue of Collingwood when you remove Collingwoods gaming revenue.pussycat wrote:For the 2013 season the Penrith Panthers annual turnover almost doubled the AFL's wealthiest club - CollingwoodAdum wrote:why in their Annual report from 2013 they reported a revenue of 17,725,213 million
thats bigger than most NRL clubs total club revenue
Penrith District Rubgy League Football Club
- Revenue - $20.718 million
- Sponsorship - $5.428 million
- Gate reciepts - $1.6 million
- Merchandise - $341,000
Property Trust Income - $4.3 million
NRL Grant - $6.81 million.
Collingwood Football Club
- Revenue (without Gaming) $52.2 million ($75 million inc)
- Sponsorship $19.65 million
- match returns 1.83 million
- Membership $16.7 million
- AFL Distribution $12.56 million
to sum it up, the NRL teams are worthless pieces of shit.
if thats all the sponsors the NRL so called biggest team can attract.![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
don't you just love fumblers folks
they used to masturbate over their clubs overall revenues ( including gaming ) which was a significant % as well
then
when NRL fans pointed out that if you included their clubs gaming revenues they'd on average .... DOUBLE ... most VFL clubs overall revenues
they went
![]()
.... you can't do that !!
oh ... why ?>
ahhhhhhhhh![]()
lets just leave the gaming revenues out then cos we can't win otherwise![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
to it sum up
fumblers are cockheads
Go Back a page .
The NRL are Bad Bad Bad for having poker machines :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> pot calling kettle black![]()
![]()
The_Wookie wrote:given the average growth rate over the last month has been less than 50 for those clubs not updated in the previous four days...i wouldnt be expecting a huge leap. Did i meantion these numbers are comparable to AFL membership numbers....from 1995.
You are delusional! The Swans are the largest club in NSW! 37k members, largest crowd average, largest sponsorship and the largest football based revenue - yet you continue to sprout absolute nonsense - are you 12??? You act like a 12 yr old! NRL 20 yrs behind the AFL in every aspect - good luck but your only trying to convince your self it seems!pussycat wrote:The_Wookie wrote:given the average growth rate over the last month has been less than 50 for those clubs not updated in the previous four days...i wouldnt be expecting a huge leap. Did i meantion these numbers are comparable to AFL membership numbers....from 1995.
So if i understand this correctly, The AFL have been going backwards in this area since the 90s. - ridiculous excuse for a sport youve got
Swans4ever wrote:You are delusional! The Swans are the largest club in NSW! 37k members, largest crowd average!pussycat wrote:The_Wookie wrote:given the average growth rate over the last month has been less than 50 for those clubs not updated in the previous four days...i wouldnt be expecting a huge leap. Did i meantion these numbers are comparable to AFL membership numbers....from 1995.
So if i understand this correctly, The AFL have been going backwards in this area since the 90s. - ridiculous excuse for a sport youve got
U are full of BS - there's 8000 interstate members making 29+k NSW based members - yet you claim all 30k Sth members are from NSW? Again BS - still stands that Swans are No1 in Sydney with over 40k crowd today makes your claims just sour grapes - how's the snot greens and their pathetic 8k crowds and members??? A real joke!!!!Raiderdave wrote:Swans4ever wrote:You are delusional! The Swans are the largest club in NSW! 37k members, largest crowd average!pussycat wrote:The_Wookie wrote:given the average growth rate over the last month has been less than 50 for those clubs not updated in the previous four days...i wouldnt be expecting a huge leap. Did i meantion these numbers are comparable to AFL membership numbers....from 1995.
So if i understand this correctly, The AFL have been going backwards in this area since the 90s. - ridiculous excuse for a sport youve got
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
33% of their members do not reside in NSW you dribbling ****** ...![]()
![]()
![]()
South Sydney have the largest number of NSW based members of any NSW professional sporting team
making them No 1
its a proven fact![]()
they rarely make a profit of more then $14 .. that's if they make a profit at all![]()
plus of course
we also all know this mob are watched by more NSWshmen then the swines are
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Swines = Jokes