Talking Footy

pussycat wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:51 pm

Geeze you bubble dwellers are a daft lot.

Able to add ratings at anytime of a Saturday. Fox even includes another channel . Matches shown to there own states. At least 1 FTA Match and next to know opposition ...but, but ,but , but, but, but..........................


I notice how quick you bubble dwellers are to try band turn the discussion back to crowds once the facts get a bit hard

youre the king of but buts. You cant handle single games being compared.

Why do you think the NRL dont show concurrent games if it doesnt effect ratings? In fact they used to play concurrent games on friday nights but wpuld never show them as a single game into each market. They knew even a late night delayed telecast would get more viewers than showing 2 games at the same time

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:17 pm

Beaussie wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:06 am

pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:27 pm

(Nine) Fri night

Cron v Melb

-TOT: 1.01m
>Nat: 737k
~5 city: 452k
▪SYD: 192k
▪MEL: 73k (main channel)
▪BRI: 171k
~Reg: 285k
>Fox: 271k

Gee, Storm on the main channel in Melbourne bombed big time.

Strange how the word BOMBED isn't used by you when talking about their ratings .

BOMBED?
Oh yeh

Oh yeah indeed. If you think Channel 9 is thinking anything other than bombed in Melbourne, then you’re more delusional that I first thought.

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:56 pm

pussycat wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:51 pm

Geeze you bubble dwellers are a daft lot.

Able to add ratings at anytime of a Saturday. Fox even includes another channel . Matches shown to there own states. At least 1 FTA Match and next to know opposition ...but, but ,but , but, but, but..........................


I notice how quick you bubble dwellers are to try band turn the discussion back to crowds once the facts get a bit hard

youre the king of but buts. You cant handle single games being compared.

Why do you think the NRL dont show concurrent games if it doesnt effect ratings? In fact they used to play concurrent games on friday nights but wpuld never show them as a single game into each market. They knew even a late night delayed telecast would get more viewers than showing 2 games at the same time

Your really reaching now. facts a bit hard? Maybe you should turn the argument back to crowds. Yet the year a Rugby league match was played in Melbourne , The only AFL match to get a bigger crowd was that years Grand Final.

I love how you igbore the point i made. The NRL dont show concurrent games for good reason, and when they played concurrent games they still never showed them that way. Answer me why if its an advantage

Oh dear
Round & round & round & round

I notice you ignored where I asked for some evidence of sacrificing $$$
Is that because you made it up ?

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:13 pm

I love how you igbore the point i made. The NRL dont show concurrent games for good reason, and when they played concurrent games they still never showed them that way. Answer me why if its an advantage

I dint ignore your posts! Didn't you see all those dam funny quotes I put in.

I cant help it if your game drags on and on. That is AFL! but yes, we can both agree there your game is shit.

pussycat wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:02 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:13 pm

I love how you igbore the point i made. The NRL dont show concurrent games for good reason, and when they played concurrent games they still never showed them that way. Answer me why if its an advantage

I dint ignore your posts! Didn't you see all those dam funny quotes I put in.

I cant help it if your game drags on and on. That is AFL! but yes, we can both agree there your game is shit.

You're still ignoring it

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:06 pm

pussycat wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:02 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:13 pm

I love how you igbore the point i made. The NRL dont show concurrent games for good reason, and when they played concurrent games they still never showed them that way. Answer me why if its an advantage

I dint ignore your posts! Didn't you see all those dam funny quotes I put in.

I cant help it if your game drags on and on. That is AFL! but yes, we can both agree there your game is shit.

You're still ignoring it

Pot meet kettle .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:02 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:06 pm

pussycat wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:02 pm

I dint ignore your posts! Didn't you see all those dam funny quotes I put in.

I cant help it if your game drags on and on. That is AFL! but yes, we can both agree there your game is shit.

You're still ignoring it

Pot meet kettle .

I addressed your question

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:56 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:02 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:06 pm

You're still ignoring it

Pot meet kettle .

I addressed your question

You bullshit again .
You have claimed that te AFL took less money for concurrent games

I've asked for some proof of that .

You can't seem to show any....
& that in AFL world is addressing the question .

Once again .
Show where .

pussycat wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:58 am

NlolRL wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:04 am

pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:39 am

Lions, Suns, a Perth team , Nth Melb . 4 of 18 not shown = 22%.

We already know how uneven your comp is. you only need look at the scores each week.

How many games do bottom 4 nrl sides get on friday night?

Stop with your excuses. Your best games are usually friday night and they get beaten

AFL: worst 4 = 0
NRL: worst 4 = 11matchews

ok, lets put this ridiculous excuse to rest once and for all.

I've averaged the final ladder positions (from last year) for all the teams playing Thursday night games for the NRL this year and the average is 7.17, so clearly slanted to the higher end of the ladder. Nothing new here.

The Friday average is even higher at 6.86

The AFL's Friday average is 7.21

So in actual fact, despite Pussy's constant whinging that the AFL taget Friday with higher performing teams, it's the NRL who are doing this to a greater degree on both Thursday, and especially Friday

Suck on that Pussy

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:12 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:56 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:02 pm

Pot meet kettle .

I addressed your question

You bullshit again .
You have claimed that te AFL took less money for concurrent games

I've asked for some proof of that .

You can't seem to show any....
& that in AFL world is addressing the question .

Once again .
Show where .

i posted today that this was my opinion based on ch7s desire to move the AFL GF to prime time and the AFL refusing to do so even if it meant more viewers and more money

My mantle piece is getting so full. I'm just not sure where I will fit this next gold medal

pussycat wrote: Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:27 pm

My mantle piece is getting so full. I'm just not sure where I will fit this next gold medal

so youre finally going to concede the NRL target Friday with higher performing sides as much, and in fact even more, than the AFL?

So suddenly it's your opinion .

Thanks for that .
Your opinion is worthless .

So there is nothing zilch ..etc to say that the AFL took less money for concurrent games .

& that was the basis of your argument when I had you cornered earlier in this thread .

So thank you

According to your theories Rl got te better deal .