Page 13 of 18
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:15 pm
by King-Eliagh
Just read the big bold writing nlol

and please, no need to thank me, I'm here to help you learn

Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:30 pm
by NlolRL
so you've got nothing like i suspected
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:00 pm
by Fred
I was banned for a week? No idea why? Maybe a glitch.
Anyway... how are we defining fitness ? It’s a broad term.
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:59 pm
by AFLcrap1
Fred wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:00 pm
I was banned for a week? No idea why? Maybe a glitch.
Anyway... how are we defining fitness ? It’s a broad term.
You know exactly why .
Can't follow rules .
Still posting personal details you got banned for previously .
In other words .
You're a grub .
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:03 pm
by Fred
Where did I post personal details ? I went through and couldn’t see it
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:04 pm
by Fred
Was there an explanation ?
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:06 pm
by Fred
I can honestly swear that I have no idea whatsoever where I mentioned personal information. I have written to the mods and no answer. I just logged in one day and said I was banned for disclosing personal information ?
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:08 pm
by Fred
Feel free to pm me to enlighten me? Was it about you or someone else?
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:12 pm
by AFLcrap1
Fuck off
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:20 pm
by Fred
Seriously, I have asked the mods for answers to this. If you can shed any light? I can’t even find the post stating I had been banned to members? Seriously, I’m thinking of walking away from this site if I don’t get answers.
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:31 am
by pussycat
Fred wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:00 pm
I was banned for a week? No idea why? Maybe a glitch.
Anyway... how are we defining fitness ? It’s a broad term.
Its not really that difficult a concept Fred.
18 players 90 interchanges (down from 120) over 120m
A further 40m worth of breaks on the field. over 120m
Plus a further 32m worth of breaks off the field.
These people may be fit, in the same sense as my niece who does an hour of aerobics twice a week. But it certainly doesn't qualify them as an elite athlete.
I would describe somebody that ran the equivalent of surfers Paradise to Burley heads in 80min. Makes 50 tackles along the way and experienced 78 collisions that have greater G-force than Astronauts or jet fighter pilot experience as an elite sportsmen. Or maybe an elite athlete would be someone who could run the hundred in 4 or 5 tenths of a second outside the time that Usain Bolt won gold at Rio.
So yes, while I do agree with you that fitness is a broad term there is a huge distance between someone who is fit and some who is an elite athlete.
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:59 am
by Fred
80 minutes for 12 Kim’s is hardly elite. I’m an underperforming park runner and can do 10 in just over 60 minutes. It’s pretty ordinary if you add in the half time rest. Don’t get me wrong not questioning whether Rl players are fit or elite (they are two different things) just saying as a runner that distance on its own at that time is quite poor for someone in a running sport. I would say the sane of a soccer, AFL, ru player with that time. I do take the point of the other variables.
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 10:30 am
by leeroy*NRL*
P.S FRED>>
I am not sure what did happen regards to your ban or even if you were banned>>
I also did not find you giving out personal info recently>>
unless posters can in lighten me..
K.E please do not accuse Anyone of being another username>
we do not want spam of this happening
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 10:32 am
by leeroy*NRL*
the difference with R.L in terms of getting Km's up
is they are limited by the defense>> as they are tackled>>
running through or around Defense by being tackled or hit
is a lot more tiring than just running
Re: Is Eddie telling us its...90 down from 120? LOL
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 11:58 am
by leeroy*NRL*
K.E I have found your post not worthy of the thread>
so I have deleted it.