Talking Footy

I've no doubt izzy and khunt have failed at professional marngrook footy. But many believe they belonged there, including Xman. What I'm saying is their physical and supreme athleticism made them look quite great at times on the field. This was acknowledged by plenty.

The AFL are complete knob jockeys the way they dealt with it though. Did izzy deserve the spot in front of others? No, though physically, as per the title of this thread, compared to marngrook players he was a supreme athlete in most ways, only trotting the distance let him down a bit. However the AFL proved their lack of credibility and urged that izzy stay on the pitch for their failed marketing exercise in western Sydney.

What we have adam is a complete farce. A joke all round. All at the expense of the AFL Their players got shown up physically, the organisation shat millions down the drain, upcoming youngsters missed their chance to get a spot on the team, izzy performed like shit turning heads of the western Sydney loyal for all the wrong reasons, commentators and experts put their foot in their mouths trying to make the best of a woeful situation before izzy made em all look like the fools they are by pissing off, Izzy lost all cred in RL and will forever be termed a gold digger.

You get the joke now adam?

King-Eliagh wrote:

I've no doubt izzy and khunt have failed at professional marngrook footy. But many believe they belonged there, including Xman. What I'm saying is their physical and supreme athleticism made them look quite great at times on the field. This was acknowledged by plenty.

The AFL are complete knob jockeys the way they dealt with it though. Did izzy deserve the spot in front of others? No, though physically, as per the title of this thread, compared to marngrook players he was a supreme athlete in most ways, only trotting the distance let him down a bit. However the AFL proved their lack of credibility and urged that izzy stay on the pitch for their failed marketing exercise in western Sydney.

What we have adam is a complete farce. A joke all round. All at the expense of the AFL Their players got shown up physically, the organisation shat millions down the drain, upcoming youngsters missed their chance to get a spot on the team, izzy performed like shit turning heads of the western Sydney loyal for all the wrong reasons, commentators and experts put their foot in their mouths trying to make the best of a woeful situation before izzy made em all look like the fools they are by pissing off, Izzy lost all cred in RL and will forever be termed a gold digger.

You get the joke now adam?

Khunt was middle on their list so earned a spot. Falou was a failure as player. Both werent recruited for their sporting skills

middle on their list khunt was rubbish all along. a supreme athlete though, which is a major reason the AFL employed him for a mil a season

Oh whats that Xman? He was there for marketing to the children, to increase interest and bring more to the games? Suns crowds have dropped almost 5k in the last few years, since khunt started his extraordinary promotion work for the AFL!

And yet you still can't show us that you understand what makes a supreme athlete, Eliagh!

King-Eliagh wrote:

I've no doubt izzy and khunt have failed at professional marngrook footy. But many believe they belonged there, including Xman. What I'm saying is their physical and supreme athleticism made them look quite great at times on the field. This was acknowledged by plenty.

The AFL are complete knob jockeys the way they dealt with it though. Did izzy deserve the spot in front of others? No, though physically, as per the title of this thread, compared to marngrook players he was a supreme athlete in most ways, only trotting the distance let him down a bit. However the AFL proved their lack of credibility and urged that izzy stay on the pitch for their failed marketing exercise in western Sydney.

What we have adam is a complete farce. A joke all round. All at the expense of the AFL Their players got shown up physically, the organisation shat millions down the drain, upcoming youngsters missed their chance to get a spot on the team, izzy performed like shit turning heads of the western Sydney loyal for all the wrong reasons, commentators and experts put their foot in their mouths trying to make the best of a woeful situation before izzy made em all look like the fools they are by pissing off, Izzy lost all cred in RL and will forever be termed a gold digger.

You get the joke now adam?

yeah i do, its still you & the NRL.
Folau failed in every area and same is hunt. both playing for teams that are fill of kida & finishing bottom the ladder.
it was folau that made a joke of him self, AFL was to tough for him, to fast, to skilled & to physical for him. the officials in the NRL where calling him to come back, so to say he lost credibility in RL circles is BS. take your
to keep trying to argue the fact, only makes you more ignorant

The officials in the AFL have lauded both, particularly on their athleticism and physicality. Can you explain this adam? It's quite contrary to your lil opinion.

you or the experts of the AFL? Sorry mate I'm goin with the experts of the AFL. Plus I play marngrook and have watched both players live in action ya silly twat. They had more speed, strength, agility, power and were tougher than 95% of the players on the paddock, in Izzy's case it was 100% hence the commentators awe. Unfortunately both weren't trained for the required endurance in league so at times they did run out of puff for a bit. Khunt doesn't seem to anymore though.

You DON'T play "marngrook", Eliagh! And you are avoiding my question into the bargain!

How would you know cwapper? you just avoid it and make things up.

I don't make anything up, little boy. You do. Grow up.

Edit - He can't. Swelling and bruising MIGHT mean a break. I never said it is DEFINITELY a break - "indicates" <> "definitely". But Eliagh lacks the maturity to admit it.

yes you do. you told everyone that swelling means its broken and that trainers protocol is to send any player with swelling to the ambo/hospital.

you made that shit up and we all know it

NRLCrap1 wrote:

I don't make anything up, little boy. You do. Grow up.

Edit - He can't. Swelling and bruising MIGHT mean a break. I never said it is DEFINITELY a break. But Eliagh lacks the maturity to admit it.

caught OUT AGAIN.
YOU ARE HOPELESS AT THIS ...
Time after time you post utter crap or straight out lies ..
HERE IS YOUR POST.



Re: The Truth is a bitter pill to swallow

Postby NRLCrap1 » Tue Feb 18, 2014 8:49 pm

Medical fact - swelling indicates a break. A proper trainer would have seen swelling and packed you off to hospital instead of risking the club's insurance.

Now admit that you made that story up, goose..

No ifs buts or any other explanation..No sprains ,twists,bumps could cause swelling.
Just the definitive statement that SWELLING INDICATES A BREAK..


I own you GOOSE

Needed to be said.