Page 13 of 18

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:26 am
by NRLCrap1
OI! DAVE!

An average is for AN ENTIRE SEASON!

So let's see the ENTIRE SEASON @ 60,000!

If you can't - you take the week off.

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:56 am
by King-Eliagh
Phelpsy wrote:
So what was the storm ratings for Melbourne out if curiosity ?


Ke ... So wrong in so many ways ... Lol


Did you find what you wanted in Thailand KE?
I imagine you're referring to your original post that 1 match cannot form an avg with your foolish comment ''so wrong...''

Ahh tell me if a batsman is on debut in a test match for the west indies. He scores...lets say 60 before being run out halfway stranded up the pitch.. What's his average after that match phelpsy ya halfwit? :\:

As for Thailand, not really. It was pretty good but I was spending time with family, so needed to compromis and unfortunately didn't get to spend as much time in the northern jungles as I'd hoped, nor in the lovely city of chiang mai where I sighted the rugby league field. Last week was unfortunately in Phuket, the biggest dump of an island I've seen...all because of, unfortunately, an unsustainable tourism industry which results in a very unauthentic commodified experience of thai culture. Entire beaches swathed in fat white whale looking euro and aussie humans without one thai enjoying the beach but rather instead servicing the whales with massages and whatever else. A cess pit. Go north if you go to Thailand.

Now answer my question re avg's phelpsy and tell me where I was so wrong in adjudicating RD's bet, or continue in the AFL members tradition of being unable to answer my questions, because they are, like for a school child placed in a higher grade than their abilities, TOO HARD :(

:lol:

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:22 am
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
OI! DAVE!

An average is for AN ENTIRE SEASON!

So let's see the ENTIRE SEASON @ 60,000!

If you can't - you take the week off.
Fuck off you dumb little lap dog.

How can RD show the entire season,when less than half a dozen games were broadcast on FTA.

DO you have any fucking idea how averages work.
Go jump on TLPGs lap & ask master to expain it to you .
Off you go Lap dog .
Yip Yip .

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:23 pm
by NRLCrap1
King-Eliagh wrote:
Ahh tell me if a batsman is on debut in a test match for the west indies. He scores...lets say 60 before being run out halfway stranded up the pitch.. What's his average after that match phelpsy ya halfwit? :\:
He doesn't have one yet because he hasn't played enough innings!

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:49 pm
by King-Eliagh
NRLCrap1 wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Ahh tell me if a batsman is on debut in a test match for the west indies. He scores...lets say 60 before being run out halfway stranded up the pitch.. What's his average after that match phelpsy ya halfwit? :\:
He doesn't have one yet because he hasn't played enough innings!
Wrong. :lol: Ok back to teacher pupil, lets go! What's 60 divided by 1 cwapper?

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:57 pm
by Fred
Yes, I take your point re the batsman. I think trying to say storm average 60000 in Melbourne is a bit silly. Would be like saying swans average whatever it rated in the grand final.

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:33 pm
by King-Eliagh
Well that's your perspective there phelpsy, and you're fine to have it. Fact of the matter is, regular season avg was not stipulated by the unfortunate AFL supporter in this case. He simply didn't think. I'd suggest he doesn't think often and a week outta here for him to reflect on his inability to think would do him the world of good don't you think phelpsy?

In any case he lost the bet and will now forever go down as the welching fool :lol:

His avatar...? Ohhhhhhohohohohohoooooo the irony! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:11 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:
OI! DAVE!

An average is for AN ENTIRE SEASON!

So let's see the ENTIRE SEASON @ 60,000!

If you can't - you take the week off.

I said Storm FTA games shown in Melbourne in 2013...you twat

there were 4
the 4 ....I posted

242,000 viewers watched those 4 games in Melbourne
at an average of 60,500

now

get the fuck outta here ... :cool:

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:16 pm
by Raiderdave
Phelpsy wrote:
Yes, I take your point re the batsman. I think trying to say storm average 60000 in Melbourne is a bit silly. Would be like saying swans average whatever it rated in the grand final.
242K divided by 4 is 60K
whats silly about that you fuckwit ? :?>

yr little mate should be packin his things
cos hes outta here for a week :cool:

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:06 pm
by Fred
Oh, if there were only 4 games in Melbourne on fta in 2013 then you have appoint Dave. Including finals a bit sneaky though

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:55 pm
by NRLCrap1
There were more than four games on FTA, Dave! Take ALL of them, not just your favourite four!

As for you, Eliagh, in statistics no average is acceptable when the core figure is 1. So your question is irrelevant. I'll give you an example. 1 player plays one test and gets a century. He never plays again. And retires with an average higher than Don Bradman's!!

Now you explain that one away! Oh yeah. You CAN'T!

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:05 pm
by Fred
Let's clear this up ... Dave has said he was claiming the fta average for Melbourne in 2013. Repeated above. He then states he has given the fta average for 2013 as he reported ... Stating that only 4 games were shown on fta for 2013. So this is clearly implying that Dave was talking about 2013 average.

Now if there were only 4 games shown on fta in 2013 into Melbourne then Dave has won the bet, assuming his figures are correct of course. Finals is okay, although sneaky, it wasn't stipulated or implied finals couldn't be included.

If there were more than 4 games shown on fta in Melbourne of the storm ... And average is less than 60000, then nrlcrap wins.

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:18 pm
by King-Eliagh
Nope I'm sorry phelpsy. We all know you would like the bet to have been made as you state above. But unfortunately for the member who doesn't think too much, cwapper, he didn't stipulate anything of the sort. You just gotsta make bets clear in here, as you do in the real world. Cwapper stated, and I quote.
widdle cwapper don't think much wrote:
you shoe me an avg 60k plus for the storm and ill take a week outta here
It's too late you softies in shining armour, cwappers wost the bet! #-o :(/

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:36 pm
by Fred
Nope, I disagree ke. Hence why I am
Okay with the finals but Dave has made it very clear he meant the season by his posts. His own words !

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:37 pm
by Fred
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
OI! DAVE!

An average is for AN ENTIRE SEASON!

So let's see the ENTIRE SEASON @ 60,000!

If you can't - you take the week off.

I said Storm FTA games shown in Melbourne in 2013...you twat

there were 4
the 4 ....I posted

242,000 viewers watched those 4 games in Melbourne
at an average of 60,500

now

get the fuck outta here ... :cool:

As can be seen here for instance