Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

To be honest nrl should put rate the AFL gf on time slot alone ... Be funny if it didn't

It would be a massive kick in the teeth if the NRL GF didnt rate better in prime time on Sunday, than the A fL GF outside prime time.

:_<> :_<> :_<>

the VFL GF
beaten by pillow case shopping.. bunnings ... & Nigela Lawson making a tart :_<> :_<> :_<>


5th fumblers
tis where you belong ............. enjoy

. Can you explain what beat it in its time slot?

> :_<> :_<>

what the fuck could of beat it

it was up against FUCKING NOTHING .............. :_<> :_<>
f me

how dumb are these fumblers
how dumb :_<> :_<>

So basically everyone who was home watching TV watched the AFL gf...

I wonder if the NRL gf will boast the same?

Raiderdave wrote:

it was up against FUCKING NOTHING .............. :_<> :_<>

Yes it was. It was up against.....being outside, going to visit friends and all the other things one does during the day time and not at night.

The NRL can't compete against that!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

To be honest nrl should put rate the AFL gf on time slot alone ... Be funny if it didn't

It would be a massive kick in the teeth if the NRL GF didnt rate better in prime time on Sunday, than the A fL GF outside prime time.

:_<> :_<> :_<>

the VFL GF
beaten by pillow case shopping.. bunnings ... & Nigela Lawson making a tart :_<> :_<> :_<>


5th fumblers
tis where you belong ............. enjoy

. Can you explain what beat it in its time slot?

> :_<> :_<>

what the fuck could of beat it

it was up against FUCKING NOTHING .............. :_<> :_<>
f me

how dumb are these fumblers
how dumb :_<> :_<>

So basically everyone who was home watching TV watched the AFL gf...
?

:_<> :_<>

Kudos
I mean its pretty hard to beat the Leyland Brothers & pumpkin scones :_<> :_<> :_<>


5th
wow fumblers
wow

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

it was up against FUCKING NOTHING .............. :_<> :_<>

Yes it was. It was up against.....being outside,

>

:_<> :_<>

did he just post that ?

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Yes I did. It's called reality. Try it sometime......if you can stomach it.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Yes I did. It's called reality. Try it sometime......if you can stomach it.

I wouldn't bother he is a coward - cowards can criticise but can't admit when their wrong!

Elvis is back

Elvis is dead.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Elvis is dead.

along with the VFL it seems :_<> :_<>

5th fumblers


5th :_<> :_<>

Oh very good, Dave! It's fifth and it's dead? If it was dead it would be nowhere!

Stupid dick.....

Not looking good for the NRL GF. 2.17m Metro.

Very dissapointing for prime-time. Very unlikely to get over 3.6m Australia wide

Yep no interstate side for NRL means their TV ratings plummet - have to be regarded as year where overall the NRL went backwards, lower crowds, drop in TV ratings only memberships have improved!

Xman wrote:

Not looking good for the NRL GF. 2.17m Metro.

Very dissapointing for prime-time. Very unlikely to get over 3.6m Australia wide

ah well. expected without an interstate matchup i guess. maybe now management will pick up its game like the AFL did 20 years ago.

2.1m is pathetic for prime time. The worrying trend of declining nRL ratings continues. Imagine the ratings if the game was on a Saturday afternoon! nRL sold out to get bigger ratings... ends up with smaller ratings. Dementedave can we have your thoughts?

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Elvis is dead.

along with the VFL it seems :_<> :_<>

5th fumblers


5th :_<> :_<>

Yoohoo, Dave

What was that you were saying? Weren't you claiming the NRL would get well over 2.5m metro? What happened?