Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Proof? Or is this another of your fantasies?

RL
Souths 5t 5g 30 Date:Sun 16-Jun-2013 Venue:Barlow Crowd:16,118
Gold Coast Titans 4t 4g 24 Souths won by 6 pts [Match details]

AFL
Round 16 Sat 13 Jul Gold Coast Cazalys Stadium Crowd 11197 Win 53-44 9 D. Martin 31
D. Jackson 2
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh look, around the average NRL crowd. =D> =D>

Just providing proof to the resident liar.
Who demands proof off everyone else ,yet can make the most outlandish claims & never provides proof.
Maybe you as a mod could ask for some proof of his bullshit.
& people wonder why threads go off track.
Anything can be claimed & no proof required .
Just look at Beaussies claim about RL fans .
So if this site wants decent debate ,how about tightening up rules about sources/claims/proof.
Because now why bother ,you are busy dealing with fumble fucktards who have the IQ of my morning shit.

You seriously think I have time to ask for proof of every claim on here? Even when it is provided it's denied with "but but but" anyway

its easy dickhead
if a call for proof is met by said proof by a reliable source ( wikiderpia is excluded)............ the caller is banned for 24 hrs
if satisfactory proof is not forth coming
the claimant is banned for 24 hrs

would clean this joke of a forum up
& see the demise of cockheads like Adamliar & NRLtardia ......

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Proof? Or is this another of your fantasies?

RL
Souths 5t 5g 30 Date:Sun 16-Jun-2013 Venue:Barlow Crowd:16,118
Gold Coast Titans 4t 4g 24 Souths won by 6 pts [Match details]

AFL
Round 16 Sat 13 Jul Gold Coast Cazalys Stadium Crowd 11197 Win 53-44 9 D. Martin 31
D. Jackson 2
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh look, around the average NRL crowd. =D> =D>

Just providing proof to the resident liar.
Who demands proof off everyone else ,yet can make the most outlandish claims & never provides proof.
Maybe you as a mod could ask for some proof of his bullshit.
& people wonder why threads go off track.
Anything can be claimed & no proof required .
Just look at Beaussies claim about RL fans .
So if this site wants decent debate ,how about tightening up rules about sources/claims/proof.
Because now why bother ,you are busy dealing with fumble fucktards who have the IQ of my morning shit.

You seriously think I have time to ask for proof of every claim on here? Even when it is provided it's denied with "but but but" anyway

its easy dickhead
if a call for proof is met by said proof by a reliable source ( wikiderpia is excluded)............ the caller is banned for 24 hrs
if satisfactory proof is not forth coming
the claimant is banned for 24 hrs

would clean this joke of a forum up
& see the demise of cockheads like Adamliar & NRLtardia ......

This woul be the only forum on the web with such ridiculous rules

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Proof? Or is this another of your fantasies?

RL
Souths 5t 5g 30 Date:Sun 16-Jun-2013 Venue:Barlow Crowd:16,118
Gold Coast Titans 4t 4g 24 Souths won by 6 pts [Match details]

AFL
Round 16 Sat 13 Jul Gold Coast Cazalys Stadium Crowd 11197 Win 53-44 9 D. Martin 31
D. Jackson 2
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh look, around the average NRL crowd. =D> =D>

Just providing proof to the resident liar.
Who demands proof off everyone else ,yet can make the most outlandish claims & never provides proof.
Maybe you as a mod could ask for some proof of his bullshit.
& people wonder why threads go off track.
Anything can be claimed & no proof required .
Just look at Beaussies claim about RL fans .
So if this site wants decent debate ,how about tightening up rules about sources/claims/proof.
Because now why bother ,you are busy dealing with fumble fucktards who have the IQ of my morning shit.

You seriously think I have time to ask for proof of every claim on here? Even when it is provided it's denied with "but but but" anyway

its easy dickhead
if a call for proof is met by said proof by a reliable source ( wikiderpia is excluded)............ the caller is banned for 24 hrs
if satisfactory proof is not forth coming
the claimant is banned for 24 hrs

would clean this joke of a forum up
& see the demise of cockheads like Adamliar & NRLtardia ......

Bingo .
If I make a claim & cant provide poof then yeh I will cop a ban ..no worries.
Seems to me XMAN doesn't want that as his AFL compulsive lying comrades would then have to tel the truth or get banned.

Easy fix to a major problem..
Any forum I am on ,if you make a claim..it must be backed up with a source/proof So that debate can be had about the subject.& WIKI is not a source.
How fucking hard is it.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Proof? Or is this another of your fantasies?

RL
Souths 5t 5g 30 Date:Sun 16-Jun-2013 Venue:Barlow Crowd:16,118
Gold Coast Titans 4t 4g 24 Souths won by 6 pts [Match details]

AFL
Round 16 Sat 13 Jul Gold Coast Cazalys Stadium Crowd 11197 Win 53-44 9 D. Martin 31
D. Jackson 2
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh look, around the average NRL crowd. =D> =D>

Just providing proof to the resident liar.
Who demands proof off everyone else ,yet can make the most outlandish claims & never provides proof.
Maybe you as a mod could ask for some proof of his bullshit.
& people wonder why threads go off track.
Anything can be claimed & no proof required .
Just look at Beaussies claim about RL fans .
So if this site wants decent debate ,how about tightening up rules about sources/claims/proof.
Because now why bother ,you are busy dealing with fumble fucktards who have the IQ of my morning shit.

You seriously think I have time to ask for proof of every claim on here? Even when it is provided it's denied with "but but but" anyway

its easy dickhead
if a call for proof is met by said proof by a reliable source ( wikiderpia is excluded)............ the caller is banned for 24 hrs
if satisfactory proof is not forth coming
the claimant is banned for 24 hrs

would clean this joke of a forum up
& see the demise of cockheads like Adamliar & NRLtardia ......

This woul be the only forum on the web with such ridiculous rules

yep
protect your little fumbler mates ........ you pathetic excuse for a moderator

Excatly what im thinking.
If we are willing to cop a ban for claims without a source than why not do it.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Proof? Or is this another of your fantasies?

RL
Souths 5t 5g 30 Date:Sun 16-Jun-2013 Venue:Barlow Crowd:16,118
Gold Coast Titans 4t 4g 24 Souths won by 6 pts [Match details]

AFL
Round 16 Sat 13 Jul Gold Coast Cazalys Stadium Crowd 11197 Win 53-44 9 D. Martin 31
D. Jackson 2
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh look, around the average NRL crowd. =D> =D>

Just providing proof to the resident liar.
Who demands proof off everyone else ,yet can make the most outlandish claims & never provides proof.
Maybe you as a mod could ask for some proof of his bullshit.
& people wonder why threads go off track.
Anything can be claimed & no proof required .
Just look at Beaussies claim about RL fans .
So if this site wants decent debate ,how about tightening up rules about sources/claims/proof.
Because now why bother ,you are busy dealing with fumble fucktards who have the IQ of my morning shit.

You seriously think I have time to ask for proof of every claim on here? Even when it is provided it's denied with "but but but" anyway

its easy dickhead
if a call for proof is met by said proof by a reliable source ( wikiderpia is excluded)............ the caller is banned for 24 hrs
if satisfactory proof is not forth coming
the claimant is banned for 24 hrs

would clean this joke of a forum up
& see the demise of cockheads like Adamliar & NRLtardia ......

Bingo .
If I make a claim & cant provide poof then yeh I will cop a ban ..no worries.
Seems to me XMAN doesn't want that as his AFL compulsive lying comrades would then have to tel the truth or get banned.

Easy fix to a major problem..
Any forum I am on ,if you make a claim..it must be backed up with a source/proof So that debate can be had about the subject.& WIKI is not a source.
How fucking hard is it.

yep
its easy

& we're not talking about opinions

I think the VFL is shit
an opinion .... comment stands

Rugby League is the most watched sport in Australia
provide proof or be banned

I think the NRL GF has better entertainment then the VFL's
an opinion .... comment stands

there are no RL juniors in the Sthn states
provide proof or be banned

Midgets crowds are fudged
an opinion .... comment stands

news articles are satisfactory proof
official websites are as well


yep
to use an old Labor Party slogan............ ITS TIME !!

Reality tip, Dave. Under those rules you'd be in more trouble than anyone else. Can one prove something doesn't exist? You are having big trouble understanding that the answer is "No". One has to prove something DOES exist - like the Giants "fudging their figures". Not an opinion. That's a statement of fact by you. "I think"....okay THAT is an opinion. Now if you add that to the front of "fudging their figures" THEN it's an opinion. But you didn't do that did you?

It's time alright. Almost time to reveal the extent of Dave's problems with reality. And his meat puppet while we're at it - and the real reasons behind it all.

All AFL tickets are 2.50 lol

Dave would be in major trouble ... Over and over he just makes stuff up lol

Quick point about those Cairns figures.

11,197 at Cazalys is a sell out. The capacity is 12,000.
http://www.austadiums.com/stadiums/stadiums.php?id=23

Barlow Oval (where the thugby game was played) has a capacity of 18,000. Probably a sell out as well, but just slightly more vacant space at match time.

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave would be in major trouble ... Over and over he just makes stuff up lol

and yet ...... I'm the one advocating the change
& its gutless cockheads like you .... running away from them ?


wow
who shat their pants ?

oh.. that's just the fear in here from fumblers contemplating these new rules :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Dave is so deluded he can't see the problem. I know why.....

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave is so deluded he can't see the problem. I know why.....

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Proof? Or is this another of your fantasies?

RL
Souths 5t 5g 30 Date:Sun 16-Jun-2013 Venue:Barlow Crowd:16,118
Gold Coast Titans 4t 4g 24 Souths won by 6 pts [Match details]

AFL
Round 16 Sat 13 Jul Gold Coast Cazalys Stadium Crowd 11197 Win 53-44 9 D. Martin 31
D. Jackson 2
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh look, around the average NRL crowd. =D> =D>

Just providing proof to the resident liar.
Who demands proof off everyone else ,yet can make the most outlandish claims & never provides proof.
Maybe you as a mod could ask for some proof of his bullshit.
& people wonder why threads go off track.
Anything can be claimed & no proof required .
Just look at Beaussies claim about RL fans .
So if this site wants decent debate ,how about tightening up rules about sources/claims/proof.
Because now why bother ,you are busy dealing with fumble fucktards who have the IQ of my morning shit.

You seriously think I have time to ask for proof of every claim on here? Even when it is provided it's denied with "but but but" anyway

its easy dickhead
if a call for proof is met by said proof by a reliable source ( wikiderpia is excluded)............ the caller is banned for 24 hrs
if satisfactory proof is not forth coming
the claimant is banned for 24 hrs

would clean this joke of a forum up
& see the demise of cockheads like Adamliar & NRLtardia ......

Bingo .
If I make a claim & cant provide poof then yeh I will cop a ban ..no worries.
Seems to me XMAN doesn't want that as his AFL compulsive lying comrades would then have to tel the truth or get banned.

Easy fix to a major problem..
Any forum I am on ,if you make a claim..it must be backed up with a source/proof So that debate can be had about the subject.& WIKI is not a source.
How fucking hard is it.

yep
its easy

& we're not talking about opinions

I think the VFL is shit
an opinion .... comment stands

Rugby League is the most watched sport in Australia
provide proof or be banned

I think the NRL GF has better entertainment then the VFL's
an opinion .... comment stands

there are no RL juniors in the Sthn states
provide proof or be banned
:

including the everything rugby vs AFL most watched.......

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave is so deluded he can't see the problem. I know why.....

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Yeah that's why. You are running because you know that I know the truth about you.