Talking Footy

Oh no! No No No No No No No No No No! I can't stand this! I can't stand it! Xman is losing his mind!







:P

Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.

MarkZZZ wrote:

Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.

If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results.

Interested?

MarkZZZ wrote:

Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.

Yes you would, and that's why it shouldn't be you.

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.

If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results. And if we disagree twice, you're fired!

Interested?

Quote altered for accuracy.

Beaussie the reason Xman gets trashed for being bias is because...he is bias. He cant help it. And he doesnt know he is, so there's no helping him.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.

If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results. And if we disagree twice, you're fired!

Interested?

Quote altered for accuracy.

Beaussie the reason Xman gets trashed for being bias is because...he is bias. He cant help it. And he doesnt know he is, so there's no helping him.

Mr pot, meet Mr Kettle.

No, I disagree, Xman. KE is way beyond Pot and Kettle!

Oh I know I'm bias, this makes me a better judge. That's the difference between me and Xman :D

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh I know I'm bias, this makes me a better judge. That's the difference between me and Xman :D

>

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh I know I'm bias, this makes me a better judge. That's the difference between me and Xman :D

>

No no no, Xman, it goes like this;

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.

If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results. And if we disagree twice, you're fired!

Interested?

Quote altered for accuracy.

Beaussie the reason Xman gets trashed for being bias is because...he is bias. He cant help it. And he doesnt know he is, so there's no helping him.

I'm sorry, but I don't agree. Comon MarkZZZ, lets put to an end any further calls of AFL bias in the BS files.

If we're talking about NRL vs AFL, of course Xman's biased towards the AFL. He's admitted he's never been to an NRL match and only watches it for something to laugh at. Me I'll admit i've experienced less AFL, and that's why im a better judge

I think Mark would be good also but I'll add in warning that working with Xman is like working with a one eyed turkey with his head stuck in the ground. Unless, he acknowledges his own bias.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Me I'll admit i've experienced less AFL, and that's why im a better judge

I think Mark would be good also but I'll add in warning that working with Xman is like working with a one eyed turkey with his head stuck in the ground. Unless, he acknowledges his own bias.

You demonstrated when you had the chance that you couldn't help yourself when it comes to showing your bias towards the NRL. Boardered on the ridiculous hence your removal from the role. As TLPG would say... needed to be said.

I demonstrated one decision which went against Xman's view on a technicality i.e. "AFL was not played in Newcastle" Technically it wasnt and isnt. And wasnt i out on my ear for that one! Quite classic

If Mark is to be put forward as a mod i would suggest that he needs to have equal power and can not be "sacked" by Xman but rather sacked by the members if they so wish.

King-Eliagh wrote:

If Mark is to be put forward as a mod i would suggest that he needs to have equal power and can not be "sacked" by Xman but rather sacked by the members if they so wish.

Fair enough. Sounds reasonable to me.