BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

[NSWAFL]

1,556 is not enough to prove that RFL is 50 times bigger. Like Xman said, it's only ten times (forgetting for the moment that it's more than 156 AFL clubs). You're still 6,244 clubs away from avoiding the BS point.

[ParraEelsNRL]

Nope, I have killed you in this thread.

[Xman]

Bahahahaha.

AFL world wide isn't within 10,000 of RL in the UK.

You don't even have official sites that show the amount of sponsorships your game has, what if any of these games are shown on TV, radio, no crowd stats or proper playing numbers that add up, ffs, around 15 of those links the dope put in had 1 whole team or 2 at most playing 9 a side.

This thread is done and you guys have tried to weasel your way out of everything in here the whole time.

You yourself ex woman have been shown up as a biased mod worse than what you think El D is.

Get over it, LU kicked you off the site 20 times or whatever it was, move on and stop taking it out on people here who have no say.

Parra, you threw the 50 times claim out there not me. If you can't show a way of quantifying it that's your problem and your failing. No use blaming others!

[ParraEelsNRL]

Are you denying that the RFL is not 50 times bigger?

[ParraEelsNRL]

How much money does AFL get world wide each year?

50 times less than the SL alone?

Well how about answering some question ex fool?

Would the RFL make 50 times the money Global AFL does outside Australia each year?

Post something with some proof for phucks sake.

[ParraEelsNRL]

3 points coming my way.

[NSWAFL]

How much money does AFL get world wide each year?

50 times less than the SL alone?

Well how about answering some question ex fool?

Would the RFL make 50 times the money Global AFL does outside Australia each year?

Post something with some proof for phucks sake.

All irrelevant. This is about number of leagues and number of clubs. Money is all about marketing and that proves nothing about size, at all.

You have to prove there are either 3000 comps or 8550 clubs in RL in the UK. Or you get the BS point here.

[ParraEelsNRL]

It's got everything to do with it bumfluffer, you don't get to pick and choose what can and can't be used.

So start putting in those sponsorships and TV rights that get within 50 times of UK Rugby League.

[King-Eliagh]

How many times more has the RFL been on tv than the AFL internationally?

And if there are no official crowd figures i.e. noone takes crow figures, I think we could provide some averages of amatuer australian comp crowd figures and sum them up, this would be a valid and fair way to do it right? Becuase the amateur leagues in australia would definitely get bigger crowds than o/s so its a safe bet. I mean if there are no official crowd figures they're gunna be awful low and having played aussie rules overseas I recall about 25 watching Amsterdam take on paris, two of the bigger leagues internationally i reckon

I'd guess the average amateur comp with say 12 teams, 6 games a weekend played over 16 weeks gets around 50 per game X 6 = 300 per week X 16 = 4,800 fans per year. There's definitely not 60 comps going on as nsw suggests, several of us have risked our computer safety to figure that one out. Given nsw's invalid links we must go with parras count of 159 clubs worldwide so no more than 30comps @ approx 4,800 max a year so about 150,000 fans all up internationally per year. How many in the UK for league with 1556 clubs I wonder? But these stats are just my estimates and probably very generous to the aussie rules team.

Does anyone know the avg crowd figures for amateur aussie rules in nsw? NSWAFL you'd know where a stat for that would be wouldn't you? Having played in sydney I'd say its less than 50.

[Xman]

How much money does AFL get world wide each year?

50 times less than the SL alone?

Well how about answering some question ex fool?

Would the RFL make 50 times the money Global AFL does outside Australia each year?

Post something with some proof for phucks sake.

Whether I think rl in England is 50 times bigger doesn't matter. You made a claim and were asked for proof. The only way to prove it is show comparable numbers of either players, clubs or leagues. These are quantifiable. Other factors are more subjective.

[NSWAFL]

Thank you, Xman.

[ParraEelsNRL]

I have proved it countless times.

And if you don't give me the best and smartest point when the week is up, your true Bias shinning through will be complete.

[King-Eliagh]

How much money does AFL get world wide each year?

50 times less than the SL alone?

Well how about answering some question ex fool?

Would the RFL make 50 times the money Global AFL does outside Australia each year?

Post something with some proof for phucks sake.

Whether I think rl in England is 50 times bigger doesn't matter. You made a claim and were asked for proof. The only way to prove it is show comparable numbers of either players, clubs or leagues. These are quantifiable. Other factors are more subjective.

Crowds and sponsorship dont go towards making the game bigger? Please say no as then 90% of all AFL supporters arguments are down the gurgler as well

[NSWAFL]

This is not an argument about money and crowds, Dunce! It's about the size of the sport itself!

[King-Eliagh]

So by your analogy, combined, the katoomba blackcats and colyton mount druitt colts rugby league teams are bigger than the collingwood magpies AFL team? Cause there's two of them right? That means the "size of the sport" would be bigger. Nothing to do with the amount of interest or revenue the sport creates that makes it "bigger"?

Please dont call me dunce anymore, coming from someone as stupid as you, its highly offensive.

Now get your tissues and popcorn and get back to your chinese porn and facebook you obscene BS artist.