Page 13 of 13
Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:16 pm
by NSWAFL
Honestly, Dave, you are so f'ing STOOPID!!
I'm not going to bother answering your points, because you don't have any.
Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:33 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:Raiderdave wrote: why didn't the AFL attract a crowd of 100K between 1987 & 2007
Because in normal configuration we don't quite have a 100k stadium.
sorry thats not an excuse
your game wasn't popular enough for 100K
just ask NSWAFL

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:37 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
since when has ... continually .... not meant .... every single time
but if its not every single time... you said this anyway ........ but then back peddled ... distracted ... changed .. distorted ... moved the goal posts ... then moved them elsewhere .. then hid them ... like a gutless .. gonadless lady boy
if its not then how often is it ?
your disgraceful ... sordidly dishonourable behaviour in here today is amongst the lowest I have seen in here
& you call yourself a mod
you are a disgrace

I can see you have NFI when it comes to the bs files.
I used the term continually meaning over and over, not every single time. The definition of continually on dictionary.com is: very often, at regular or frequent intervals. This is exactly how i meant it.
You then asked if I wanted to bet on it. I then clarified my meaning further bynusing the term overall in case you didn't get the context the first time.
You then called a bs challenge. It's on these terms the challenge is called, not some stupid notion you have.
Dumbass
You Said ANY .... thats what I challenged
then you changed tack quicker then usain bolt ova 100m you gutless sheila
does the flogabll GF outrate ANY RL in Aus or not ?...
its a pretty easy question
yes .. or no
beep beep beep

LOL you really haven't mastered the english language have you.
Yes there are years when the AFL GF outrates any RL, but not every year, just most. This is exactly why I said "continually"
Maybe go back and repeat year 8 again, for the fourth time.
Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:46 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:Honestly, Dave, you are so f'ing STOOPID!!
I'm not going to bother answering your points, because you don't have any.
you............. aren't smart enough to be an F wit

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:50 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:
I can see you have NFI when it comes to the bs files.
I used the term continually meaning over and over, not every single time. The definition of continually on dictionary.com is: very often, at regular or frequent intervals. This is exactly how i meant it.
You then asked if I wanted to bet on it. I then clarified my meaning further bynusing the term overall in case you didn't get the context the first time.
You then called a bs challenge. It's on these terms the challenge is called, not some stupid notion you have.
Dumbass
You Said ANY .... thats what I challenged
then you changed tack quicker then usain bolt ova 100m you gutless sheila
does the flogabll GF outrate ANY RL in Aus or not ?...
its a pretty easy question
yes .. or no
beep beep beep

LOL you really haven't mastered the english language have you.
Yes there are years when the AFL GF outrates any RL, but not every year, just most. This is exactly why I said "continually"
Maybe go back and repeat year 8 again, for the forth time.
beep beep beep

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:59 pm
by NSWAFL
As I said. No points.
Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:18 pm
by cos789
Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:Raiderdave wrote: why didn't the AFL attract a crowd of 100K between 1987 & 2007
Because in normal configuration we don't quite have a 100k stadium.
sorry thats not an excuse
Even a frigging utter moron knows you can't expect to put more people into a stadium than it can hold.