Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Swans now at 34,366 on target for 40k - still the BIGGEST CLUB in Sydney!

23500 in NSW

Souths have 26000 of their 28500 in NSW
making them the biggest f wit

Swines Numb 2

a big
numb 2

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

lol, bronco wishes they could get 30k

sorta like the Wions wish they could make a profit eh ?

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

They don't need to wish anymore, with the board being restructured and an entire new coaching staff. Plus with us making the finals this year, and possibly be wining the grand final, we will be swimming in money, by october

Sorry it has been reported that the kitty kats are technically INSOLVENT

something like 14 of the NRL clubs are in?
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 2swhv.html

NRL clubs don't carry over debt so no piss flap .. it isn't anything like the same
VFL clubs do
the Wions are as close as any VFL club has been in 17 years in the VFL.. to folding

aaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

But I thought you said the Leagues clubs and the football clubs are one and the same if The Panthers Leagues clubs owe 40 mil then they must carry debt - if you say they are separate then I am right in my previous posts about the Raiders Football club being a separate identity to the Leagues club - either way time to eat humble pie and admit your wrong ONE WAY OR THE OTHER!

I didn't say that at all shithead
I said the Raiders own their operations ... also the Broncos do as well

the Panthers group owe nothing of the sort you dribbling twat & the Panthers Football club are ... debt free

in most cases ... Leagues clubs have a license to trade off the NRL football clubs brand
& pay for the privilege
that privilege is paying off any shortfall between income & costs

hence
most NRL football club carries over no debt on their operations

meanwhile half of the VFLs clubs are wallowing in it

Falling drink and food revenues, poker machine tax, smoking bans and previous mismanagement were all to blame for Panthers Group eyeballing $90 million in debt.

The pathway out of it involved selling off four of the licensed clubs the group owned, even if some had been turning a profit. "We had no choice," Wilson says.

Critically, it also came down to Packer providing a deposit on the debt. How much? Gould describes it as "millions of dollars".

Just as the Panthers Group had to sell off its assets to survive, so did the football club in its bid to be competitive.

The financial pressures on one side of Mulgoa Road were felt on the other at Centrebet Stadium, where the football department was unloved and under-resourced.

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

lol, bronco wishes they could get 30k

sorta like the Wions wish they could make a profit eh ?

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

They don't need to wish anymore, with the board being restructured and an entire new coaching staff. Plus with us making the finals this year, and possibly be wining the grand final, we will be swimming in money, by october

Sorry it has been reported that the kitty kats are technically INSOLVENT

something like 14 of the NRL clubs are in?
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 2swhv.html

NRL clubs don't carry over debt so no piss flap .. it isn't anything like the same
VFL clubs do
the Wions are as close as any VFL club has been in 17 years in the VFL.. to folding

aaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

But I thought you said the Leagues clubs and the football clubs are one and the same if The Panthers Leagues clubs owe 40 mil then they must carry debt - if you say they are separate then I am right in my previous posts about the Raiders Football club being a separate identity to the Leagues club - either way time to eat humble pie and admit your wrong ONE WAY OR THE OTHER!

I didn't say that at all shithead
I said the Raiders own their operations ... also the Broncos do as well

the Panthers group owe nothing of the sort you dribbling twat & the Panthers Football club are ... debt free

in most cases ... Leagues clubs have a license to trade off the NRL football clubs brand
& pay for the privilege
that privilege is paying off any shortfall between income & costs

hence
most NRL football club carries over no debt on their operations

meanwhile half of the VFLs clubs are wallowing in it

[quote"We were days away from liquidation," he says, ominously. "In the short-term, the football was the least of our concerns."Buckling and twisting beneath an unfathomable debt of $90 million, the Panthers' fate could not have been any clearer.
"We were gone," says Gould.]

Falling drink and food revenues, poker machine tax, smoking bans and previous mismanagement were all to blame for Panthers Group eyeballing $90 million in debt.

The pathway out of it involved selling off four of the licensed clubs the group owned, even if some had been turning a profit. "We had no choice," Wilson says.

Critically, it also came down to Packer providing a deposit on the debt. How much? Gould describes it as "millions of dollars".

Just as the Panthers Group had to sell off its assets to survive, so did the football club in its bid to be competitive.

The financial pressures on one side of Mulgoa Road were felt on the other at Centrebet Stadium, where the football department was unloved and under-resourced.

Swans4ever wrote:

Oh so when it suits the football club owns the lot and when it doesn't suit there separate! So you're argument about Raiders FC and Raiders group is BS then time to eat humble pie moron!

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Oh so when it suits the football club owns the lot and when it doesn't suit there separate! So you're argument about Raiders FC and Raiders group is BS then time to eat humble pie moron!

funny >

I coulda sworn this dribbler posted almost exactly the same thing about 4 posts back up ?

show me where I said the Panthers own their non footballing operations
or any other clubs for that matter except

the Raiders & Broncos who do
now I thought that would have been pretty clear
except for a halfwitted moron I spose

seriously

you are a dumb fuck
& theres not much more that need be said :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

The_Wookie wrote:

As of 5pm today

The_Wookie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

As of 5pm today

that's not an up to date table for the NRL
Sharks
Raiders
Warriors .. all well past 7,000 last week

the Warriors nearer to 8,000

total nearing 210,000

Thats as up to date as Ive been able to find. You got links for the non updated or are you guessing.

pussycat wrote:

Parramatta pass 15,000.

pussycat wrote:

Parramatta pass 15,000.

Swans4ever wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Parramatta pass 15,000.

That's great just another 19500 to catch up with the Swans! And only 5000 ahead of GWS! Hahaha what a joke! =D> :_<> =D> :_<>

adamj1300 wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Parramatta pass 15,000.

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Parramatta pass 15,000.

That's great just another 19500 to catch up with the Swans! And only 5000 ahead of GWS! Hahaha what a joke! =D> :_<> =D> :_<>

ah
no

just 8,000 to catch the SWines numbers for NSW
&
12,000 ahead of the Midgets for NSW based members dickhead

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Parramatta pass 15,000.

That's great just another 19500 to catch up with the Swans! And only 5000 ahead of GWS! Hahaha what a joke! =D> :_<> =D> :_<>

ah
no

just 8,000 to catch the SWines numbers for NSW
&
12,000 ahead of the Midgets for NSW based members dickhead