Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Isn't this a membership thread?

But how do we know the ratings for AFL fully. We can't unless fox do city by city ... Not calling you a liar but it's just a fact ... However I don't think it is a leap of faith to suggest nrl rates better than AFL in qld.

Yes it is a membership thread..but ratings were lied about by adam.
I just highlighted what bullshit they are.
& its not a leap of faith..its a fact that AFL rates NO fucking where near RL in QLD..
Not even close.

& you know it

Here is some ratings for you................

Most watched on SKY Sport 2

NRL AKL Nines: 148,870 (6:10pm – 6:30pm)
NRL AKL Nines: 143,670 (2:25pm – 2:45pm)
NRL AKL Nines Pre Game: 143,530 (2:15pm – 2:25pm)
NRL AKL Nines: 138,250 (7:00pm – 7:20pm)
NRL AKL Nines: 131,270 (5:10pm – 5:30pm

Sat STV #NRL #NRL9s D1 morning 167k D1 arvo 206k #FoxSports #Auckland

+2 x 44k Crowds

Oh wait they added extra seating because NRL is so fucking awesome...................2 x 46k crowds.......

How you doing AFL............

Are they nz ratings ...


AFL... Is doing fine ... Still the number one football code in the country

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

NRL attendance:

2009 3085281
2013 3060531


AFL attendance:

2009 6369954
2013 6368346

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

NRL attendance:

2009 3085281
2013 3060531




AFL attendances:

2009 6369954
2013 6368346

hmmmmm
how bout the VFL's 2008's attendance figure wanker ?

6,511,255 for 176 games at 36,996

2013
6,368,346 for 198 games at 32,163

13% drop
a code failing end of

Phelpsy wrote:

Are they nz ratings ...


AFL... Is doing fine ... Still the number one football code in the country

they are

so

we have 1.6 Million cumulative in Australia
& 1.080 Mill cumulative in New Zealand

2.680 Million for day one in the 2 countries combined
fucking extraordinary =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>


the VFL will eventually struggle
it offers a tired , stale , boring format devoid of anything different
if you think it can keep serving up this dross year after year & continue to thrive
your delusion is on top of you

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

NRL attendance:

2009 3085281
2013 3060531




AFL attendances:

2009 6369954
2013 6368346

hmmmmm
how bout the VFL's 2008's attendance figure wanker ?

6,511,255 for 176 games at 36,996

2013
6,368,346 for 198 games at 32,163

13% drop
a code failing end of

he asked for 5 year history didnt he? >

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

http://www.talkingfootball.net/forums/g ... -2266.html
AFL membership tally in 2009 was 568748. In 2013 it was 756717. Thats an increase of around 188k

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

NRL attendance:

2009 3085281
2013 3060531




AFL attendances:

2009 6369954
2013 6368346

hmmmmm
how bout the VFL's 2008's attendance figure wanker ?

6,511,255 for 176 games at 36,996

2013
6,368,346 for 198 games at 32,163

13% drop
a code failing end of

he asked for 5 year history didnt he? >

he actually asked for membership numbers & growth dickhead
not attendances :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

http://www.talkingfootball.net/forums/g ... -2266.html
AFL membership tally in 2009 was 568748. In 2013 it was 756717. Thats an increase of around 188k

so about 33% growth
but when you exclude the 2 new sides & their 24K odd members

it goes down to 30%

the NRL barely had 100K members in 2009
they had 225K in 2013

an increase of about 125%
wow

just wow =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

I think that there is even debate around membership, playing numbers, crowds etc is proof of the inroads AFL had made into these traditional nrl heartlands. This is nrl heartland ,.... It shouldn't even be that AFL is anywhere near compete ting with nrl in any key performance indicators ..... But the AFL is !!!! The fact that the suns and lions get similar crowds to a qld team is amazing.

.

KPIs..
How about Tv ratings.
How about Juniors (Not Participation )but actual cub juniors.

The Lions are NOWHERE Near the broncos for crowds.

But don't let the facts get in the way of some good Fumble propaganda,

yeah how about those ratings, the AFL even beats the NRL in this area aswell but the way the TV rating are measured are rather inaccuriate due to the low number of meter boxes.

how it it AFL propaganda, when the facts are published by different organisations, its more of a care NRL fans being in denial how their game hasnt grown & the AFL is here to take over :>::

So the AF has better ratings in QLD than RL..

Take over ...

The game has gone backwards in the last 8 yrs ..


& can you show me some proof...any proof of the AFL outrating RL in QLD..

if you read the original post i said the AFL still has better ratings than the NRL! i never said in QLD

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Are they nz ratings ...


AFL... Is doing fine ... Still the number one football code in the country

they are

so

we have 1.6 Million cumulative in Australia
& 1.080 Mill cumulative in New Zealand

2.680 Million for day one in the 2 countries combined
fucking extraordinary =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>


the VFL will eventually struggle
it offers a tired , stale , boring format devoid of anything different
if you think it can keep serving up this dross year after year & continue to thrive
your delusion is on top of you

and thats why the ratings and crowds keep falling for the NRL H&A season, boring predictable format

the AFL is doing fine

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

http://www.talkingfootball.net/forums/g ... -2266.html
AFL membership tally in 2009 was 568748. In 2013 it was 756717. Thats an increase of around 188k

so about 33% growth
but when you exclude the 2 new sides & their 24K odd members

it goes down to 30%

the NRL barely had 100K members in 2009
they had 225K in 2013

an increase of about 125%
wow

just wow =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

if the NRL had 1 member and went to 2 it would be a 100% increase. Is that better than 188,000 >

The NRL may claim they have had a decent increase but the gap between members tally is actually growing. According you it was around 470k in 2009, 5 years later its nearly 520k more.

As for your claim about 2 new teams, theyre still new members they previously didnt have, so of course they count.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

http://www.talkingfootball.net/forums/g ... -2266.html
AFL membership tally in 2009 was 568748. In 2013 it was 756717. Thats an increase of around 188k

so about 33% growth
but when you exclude the 2 new sides & their 24K odd members

it goes down to 30%

the NRL barely had 100K members in 2009
they had 225K in 2013

an increase of about 125%
wow

just wow =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

if the NRL had 1 member and went to 2 it would be a 100% increase. Is that better than 188,000 >

The NRL may claim they have had a decent increase but the gap between members tally is actually growing. According you it was around 470k in 2009, 5 years later its nearly 520k more.

As for your claim about 2 new teams, theyre still new members they previously didnt have, so of course they count.

memberships in the NRL has always been around. All & every summer the NRL advertise the shit out of a heap of crap ads, trying to convince the brinless NRL fans that "they need you"
so the claim that the NRL has only really started adverting about them is crap
here is one from 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG4ENNjslaE

here is the one they have been whoring out all summer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFe-KD7UpNI
as well as paying the fairfax stations all summer to run ads during the Big bash league.

the NRL will never get near the AFL in memberships, because there isnt the support there for the shit game of League

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

http://www.talkingfootball.net/forums/g ... -2266.html
AFL membership tally in 2009 was 568748. In 2013 it was 756717. Thats an increase of around 188k

so about 33% growth
but when you exclude the 2 new sides & their 24K odd members

it goes down to 30%

the NRL barely had 100K members in 2009
they had 225K in 2013

an increase of about 125%
wow

just wow =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

if the NRL had 1 member and went to 2 it would be a 100% increase. Is that better than 188,000 >

The NRL may claim they have had a decent increase but the gap between members tally is actually growing. According you it was around 470k in 2009, 5 years later its nearly 520k more.

As for your claim about 2 new teams, theyre still new members they previously didnt have, so of course they count.

growing faster

4 times faster infact
end of dribbler , end of

adamj1300 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dogs wrote:

Back on topic which you guys clearly struggle with. What is the % growth of both codes memberships over the last 5 or so years. Anyone got a good website that can keep these AFL boys on task.

http://www.talkingfootball.net/forums/g ... -2266.html
AFL membership tally in 2009 was 568748. In 2013 it was 756717. Thats an increase of around 188k

so about 33% growth
but when you exclude the 2 new sides & their 24K odd members

it goes down to 30%

the NRL barely had 100K members in 2009
they had 225K in 2013

an increase of about 125%
wow

just wow =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

if the NRL had 1 member and went to 2 it would be a 100% increase. Is that better than 188,000 >

The NRL may claim they have had a decent increase but the gap between members tally is actually growing. According you it was around 470k in 2009, 5 years later its nearly 520k more.

As for your claim about 2 new teams, theyre still new members they previously didnt have, so of course they count.

memberships in the NRL has always been around. All & every summer the NRL advertise the shit out of a heap of crap ads, trying to convince the brinless NRL fans that "they need you"
so the claim that the NRL has only really started adverting about them is crap
here is one from 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG4ENNjslaE

here is the one they have been whoring out all summer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFe-KD7UpNI
as well as paying the fairfax stations all summer to run ads during the Big bash league.

the NRL will never get near the AFL in memberships, because there isnt the support there for the shit game of League

who said we never had them you cockhead
clubs always had leagues club revenue & memberships or season tickets as e called them weren't fashionable
its only been about 5 years of pushing them hard
& wow

we've more then doubled our numbers in this time
wow eh dickhead

wow