Re: AFL vs NRL grandfinal TV viewer predications.. who will
Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 5:51 pm
no its not that highPhelpsy wrote:Nrl has average of 16000 doesn't it ?
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
no its not that highPhelpsy wrote:Nrl has average of 16000 doesn't it ?
with out the club games there would be no league, idiot!Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:Oh dear, what have you got against the clubs? You're putting a three times a year non club match up above club games? You've got issues if you do that my friend. Finals count because they involve the most important part of a competition. The clubs. Without clubs you wouldn't even have SOO!!pHyR3 wrote:Okay, AFL is 30th. I'm not counting any AFL finals games because they don't count in the real world.NRLCrap1 wrote:First. Rep games don't count in the real world.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
=D> =D> =D> =D>![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
whaaaaaaaaaa
our cwubs are the only thing that matters
yeah![]()
because that's all you've got dickhead![]()
our wonderful sport has this too
&
so
so much more
including this nations biggest sporting series
what a drab little code the fumbles n bumbles is
It's all we need to beat the pants off your poor excuse of a competition! You need SOO in order to compete in the ratings! Without it you'd see just how far behind you are!!Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:Oh dear, what have you got against the clubs? You're putting a three times a year non club match up above club games? You've got issues if you do that my friend. Finals count because they involve the most important part of a competition. The clubs. Without clubs you wouldn't even have SOO!!pHyR3 wrote:Okay, AFL is 30th. I'm not counting any AFL finals games because they don't count in the real world.NRLCrap1 wrote:First. Rep games don't count in the real world.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
=D> =D> =D> =D>![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
whaaaaaaaaaa
our cwubs are the only thing that matters
yeah![]()
because that's all you've got dickhead![]()
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/c ... 6732572311Williams didn’t train on Wednesday but is a certain starter in Sunday night’s Grand Final, which Gyngell believes will attract a viewing audience of between 3.2 million and 3.5 million.
It would be a massive kick in the teeth if the NRL GF didnt rate better in prime time on Sunday, than the A fL GF outside prime time.Phelpsy wrote:To be honest nrl should put rate the AFL gf on time slot alone ... Be funny if it didn't
Xman wrote:It would be a massive kick in the teeth if the NRL GF didnt rate better in prime time on Sunday, than the A fL GF outside prime time.Phelpsy wrote:To be honest nrl should put rate the AFL gf on time slot alone ... Be funny if it didn't
hes being very conservativeXman wrote:http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/c ... 6732572311Williams didn’t train on Wednesday but is a certain starter in Sunday night’s Grand Final, which Gyngell believes will attract a viewing audience of between 3.2 million and 3.5 million.
Looks like Ch9s boss thinks the AFL will rate the highest of the GFs
It had 80% TV share. Can you explain what beat it in its time slot? I wonder if the NRL will win its time slot in every city?Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:It would be a massive kick in the teeth if the NRL GF didnt rate better in prime time on Sunday, than the A fL GF outside prime time.Phelpsy wrote:To be honest nrl should put rate the AFL gf on time slot alone ... Be funny if it didn't![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the VFL GF
beaten by pillow case shopping.. bunnings ... & Nigela Lawson making a tart![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
5th fumblers
tis where you belong ............. enjoy![]()
Phelpsy wrote:I'll speak for Dave here as his response will be predictable . First of all he will turn to NZ ratings. If still under he will come up with some dubious regional ratings. If still under he will try and compare how the nrl rated in Melbourne compared to how the AFL rates in Sydney. What he would never do is say ... Yes, the AFL got bigger ratings lol. Oh and he will say SoO was bigger anyway. Now if the nrl get bigger ratings, which it should given the time slot, we will hear how nrl is alive and kicking ... Despite what most nrl supporters say on other forums and what nrl commentators like johns say as to the game struggling.
Xman wrote:. Can you explain what beat it in its time slot?Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:It would be a massive kick in the teeth if the NRL GF didnt rate better in prime time on Sunday, than the A fL GF outside prime time.Phelpsy wrote:To be honest nrl should put rate the AFL gf on time slot alone ... Be funny if it didn't![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the VFL GF
beaten by pillow case shopping.. bunnings ... & Nigela Lawson making a tart![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
5th fumblers
tis where you belong ............. enjoy![]()