Talking Footy

Phelpsy wrote:

The barrasi line divides Canberra which would seem about right .. I would lean toward rl though re man in the street support . I would think AFL on the Gold Coast would be more popular here then in Canberra . Was at surf club this morning and they were preparing for tonight with balloons etc and were saying how packed it was last Saturday. Great door to watch the grand final ... Will remember that for next year

Anedotal evidence amounts to almost zero.

Fact is Canberra itself was populated from without with a high percentage of AF supporters.
But the ACT is in NSW so surrounded by rl supporters.
The coming of the Raiders swayed the new generation however AF is strong up to the Murrumbidgee so it is not clear exactly what the position with Canberra is .

I think it's clear as glass. It's an AFL town. Rugby league relies on the surrounding areas for it's numbers in rugby league competition, whereas from what I saw AFL doesn't. The only junior AFL teams in the ACT based competition are in Queanbeyan, except for one single junior team in Goulburn, whereas rugby league has not only Queanbeyan and Goulburn in the juniors but also Yass, Cooma, Bungendore and Crookwell.

Ffs, no one even knows Goulburn has an AFL side, fair dinkum.

You do eels lol

And i am sure all the kids and their families that play for and against them do too lol

NRLCrap1 wrote:

I think it's clear as glass. It's an AFL town. .

:_<> :_<>

a VFL town eh ?

3000 kids playing RL in Your Nations capital ..... about 18000 playing RL & Touch footy combined
& just 2000 fumbling bumbling .. & missing

4 RL games in Canberras top 10 rating shows each .... & every year
not a Vicky Kicky game appears .... in the TOP 20 .... any year

the Biggest RL crowd in Canberra for 2013
25628
the biggest fumble bumble crowd
a massively fudged 11092 so really it was 8000 & half of them didn't pay to get in :_<> :_<>

in 2012
24460 for RL
9128 for Vicky Kicky ... again fudged & padded with thousands of freebies


yeah
its a fumbles n bumbles town aint it :_<> :_<>

jesus
what a ******

Phelpsy wrote:

And i am sure all the kids and their families that play for and against them do too lol

wow
it seems ex pat sthn mongas even move to places like Goulburn eh

these poor kids
they'd be laughed at from one end of their school yards to the other in this tough ... RL loving town. :_<> :_<>

if the parents of these kids cared about their children they'd avoid exposing them to such ridicule & get them to play netball .. with the girls
as that would be less embarrassing ..
I mean it almost amounts to parental abuse

poor skinny little sods :_<> :_<>

Hey Daaaaaaave!

AFL junior clubs: 109
RL junior clubs 105

That means 1962 players for AFL and 1575 players for RL!!

3000 my rear end! Even if the 6's and 7's were added!!

YOU LOSE!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Hey Daaaaaaave!

AFL junior clubs: 109
RL junior clubs 105

That means 1962 players for AFL and 1575 players for RL!!

3000 my rear end! Even if the 6's and 7's were added!!

YOU LOSE!!

heeeeeeyyyyy cockhead

170 Junior RL Teams
99 fumble bumble ones

I mean you said clubs above
yr so rattled by my facts

you don't even know what shit yr posting now :_<> :_<>

failure
its in your DNA

You are rattled by my facts, Dave.

105 teams - not 170. Produce the 65 extra junior teams I'm missing; 1 by 1 please, with links.

And remember - that link you provided included OPEN AGES clubs so they DON'T COUNT!

But then numbers aren't you're strong point are they? Oh my bad....you don't have a strong point; AT ALL! :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

NRLCrap1 wrote:

You are rattled by my facts, Dave.

:_<> :_<>
you couldn't rattle a 2 year old

105 teams - not 170. Produce the 65 extra junior teams I'm missing; 1 by 1 please, with links.

I have about 14 times now
its not my fault your an illiterate fuckhead :_<> :_<>

And remember - that link you provided included OPEN AGES clubs so they DON'T COUNT!

ah no shithead
theres 2 lots of numbers per club on my link
I added up the larger numbers only ... as they represent the minor league teams ( juniors)
& in Canberra
they added up to ................. 170

another fail for our little **** fumbler :_<> :_<>

Again with the river in Egypt, Dave? And no proof? I blew up your so called evidence and you don't have the balls to admit it.

Here are the numbers per age group again this time with 8 and 9 added (and in the process I discovered another minor error bringing team numbers up to 107);
Now then, point out in which age group I'm missing numbers and from which club.

PS - There are only 20 ACT teams in Under 7 and 18 in Under 6 so you're still 25 short of that faked 170 number. Not that it matters because they shouldn't be playing at that age (and with AFL they don't).

Face facts, Dave. I've exposed you as a bona fide liar and your pathetic game as inferior in Canberra to AFL.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Again with the river in Egypt, Dave? And no proof? I blew up your so called evidence and you don't have the balls to admit it.

Here are the numbers per age group again this time with 8 and 9 added (and in the process I discovered another minor error bringing team numbers up to 107);

Code: Select all

                  16 15 14 13 12 11 10  9  8
Gungahlin          1  1  2  2  1  3  3  3  4  20  
Belconnen United   1  1  1  1  1  1  1  2  2  11
North Canberra     1  1  1  0  1  1  1  1  1   8
South Tuggeranong  1  1  1  1  1  2  1  2  1  11
Tuggeranong        1  1  0  1  1  1  1  1  2   9
Valley Dragons     0  2  3  1  3  2  2  2  3  18
West Belconnen     2  2  1  3  1  2  2  2  1  16
Woden Weston       2  1  1  1  1  2  1  2  3  14
                   9 10 10 10 10 14 12 15 17 107

Now then, point out in which age group I'm missing numbers and from which club.

PS - There are only 20 ACT teams in Under 7 and 18 in Under 6 so you're still 25 short of that faked 170 number. Not that it matters because they shouldn't be playing at that age (and with AFL they don't).

Face facts, Dave. I've exposed you as a bona fide liar and your pathetic game as inferior in Canberra to AFL.

ah no
again the numbers in the link provided by myself
& not the above flog job you've put together yourself :_<> :_<>

indicate 170 minor Rugby League teams in YOUR nations capital
some 71 more teams then the fumbles & bumbles have

Raiderdave wrote:

indicate 170 minor Rugby League teams some 71 more teams

OK, even by your dogey figures.
AFL clubs have twice as many members per team.
YOU LOSE ONCE AGAIN.

You've included U7 & U6 but AFCs would have loads of Auskick teams.
Auskick don't usually play against other clubs because they play against other teams inhouse.
YOU LOSE EVEN MORE!!!!

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Again with the river in Egypt, Dave? And no proof? I blew up your so called evidence and you don't have the balls to admit it.

Here are the numbers per age group again this time with 8 and 9 added (and in the process I discovered another minor error bringing team numbers up to 107);

Code: Select all

                  16 15 14 13 12 11 10  9  8
Gungahlin          1  1  2  2  1  3  3  3  4  20  
Belconnen United   1  1  1  1  1  1  1  2  2  11
North Canberra     1  1  1  0  1  1  1  1  1   8
South Tuggeranong  1  1  1  1  1  2  1  2  1  11
Tuggeranong        1  1  0  1  1  1  1  1  2   9
Valley Dragons     0  2  3  1  3  2  2  2  3  18
West Belconnen     2  2  1  3  1  2  2  2  1  16
Woden Weston       2  1  1  1  1  2  1  2  3  14
                   9 10 10 10 10 14 12 15 17 107

Now then, point out in which age group I'm missing numbers and from which club.

PS - There are only 20 ACT teams in Under 7 and 18 in Under 6 so you're still 25 short of that faked 170 number. Not that it matters because they shouldn't be playing at that age (and with AFL they don't).

Face facts, Dave. I've exposed you as a bona fide liar and your pathetic game as inferior in Canberra to AFL.

ah no
again the numbers in the link provided by myself
& not the above flog job you've put together yourself :_<> :_<>

indicate 170 minor Rugby League teams in YOUR nations capital
some 71 more teams then the fumbles & bumbles have

Wrong. Your link includes open age teams. My numbers are correct.

I repeat;

Point out in which age group I'm missing numbers and from which club.

If you won't then I will know as will everyone else that you are (again) a barefaced liar.