Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Idiot. I never mentioned The NRL teams locations, just defended the AFL from your BS.

oh theres no BS

VFL teams in Melbourne ... lacking Indendity
just a pack of souless ... cold franchises playing out of just 2 stadiums in the centre of the city
gee... lack of variety much
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

NRL teams in Sydney .. their Idendity .. even the merged teams .. clear & precise
clubs still dripping with suburban tribalism ..still playing where they played 104 years ago in some cases ... in 9 different venues from one end of the city ...
to the other

wow
what a sport

Laughable post!

The AFL has grown beyond suburbs only. Comparing crowds and members shows this. Your game is stuck in the 70s.

Melbournes AFL teams smash the giggle game of NRL For tradition. The throwball game is a joke with it's ridiculous fireworks and dancing girls! Tradition!

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

how more popular can you get then the 2 teams out of the same city

You're right. How much more popular do you want ?
This game will be bigger than the AFL average.
All probability it will be an AFL openning record.
It will be at twice to three times bigger the average nrl game.
It'll be four times as big as some Sydney nrl games.

Why do you keep on doing this dave?
You keep drawing attention to a big win by the AFL!!!

this crowd will be smaller then most games the Swans have drawn to ANZ.............. by themselves

Yet still bigger than any NRL game in Sydney.

RL heartland

dave can't seem to grasp the fact that this is a GWS home game, not the Swans.

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

You're right. How much more popular do you want ?
This game will be bigger than the AFL average.
All probability it will be an AFL openning record.
It will be at twice to three times bigger the average nrl game.
It'll be four times as big as some Sydney nrl games.

Why do you keep on doing this dave?
You keep drawing attention to a big win by the AFL!!!

this crowd will be smaller then most games the Swans have drawn to ANZ.............. by themselves

Yet still bigger than any NRL game in Sydney.

RL heartland

yet.... less then half of your original prediction ?

Sellout
Sellout

ahh. .... real big crowd ... real big crowd

errrrr...

pretty big crowd .. pretty big crowd

umm
gee......

.... VFL in Sydney

a joke

cos789 wrote:

dave can't seem to grasp the fact that this is a GWS home game, not the Swans.

cuzzy can't seem to grasp the fact that

has only 2900 members in this massive region

a fail on a massive scale

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

dave can't seem to grasp the fact that this is a GWS home game, not the Swans.

cuzzy can't seem to grasp the fact that

has only 2900 members in this massive region

a fail on a massive scale

Sydney already has another AFL team, so add those memberships to the 20k for the swans.

And the storm? 8k

One of the guys on bf just bought some tickets. They were numbered 34,878 =D>

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

dave can't seem to grasp the fact that this is a GWS home game, not the Swans.

cuzzy can't seem to grasp the fact that

has only 2900 members in this massive region

a fail on a massive scale

Sydney already has another AFL team, so add those memberships to the 20k for the swans.

And the storm? 8k

ah... 14,000 Sydney based members for the gooses
so thats

16,900 for 2 clubs
or 8,450 a club

the Storm are at ova 10,500

whooo hoooo

Xman wrote:

One of the guys on bf just bought some tickets. They were numbered 34,878 =D>

the pax ?
a bad indicator .. as I've been to games with a pax number
& the attendance falls way short of this

high 20's ATM if his ticket read that number
so my prediction is right on track

good to know

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cuzzy can't seem to grasp the fact that

has only 2900 members in this massive region

a fail on a massive scale

Sydney already has another AFL team, so add those memberships to the 20k for the swans.

And the storm? 8k

ah... 14,000 Sydney based members for the gooses
so thats

16,900 for 2 clubs
or 8,450 a club

the Storm are at ova 10,500

whooo hoooo

The swans already have 24k members. Are you suggesting 10k are from interstate?

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

One of the guys on bf just bought some tickets. They were numbered 34,878 =D>

the pax ?
a bad indicator .. as I've been to games with a pax number
& the attendance falls way short of this

high 20's ATM if his ticket read that number
so my prediction is right on track

good to know

Ha ha

Idiot.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Sydney already has another AFL team, so add those memberships to the 20k for the swans.

And the storm? 8k

ah... 14,000 Sydney based members for the gooses
so thats

16,900 for 2 clubs
or 8,450 a club

the Storm are at ova 10,500

whooo hoooo

The swans already have 24k members. Are you suggesting 10k are from interstate?

some reports have the gooses interstate membership as high as 50%
so

yes

yes I am

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ah... 14,000 Sydney based members for the gooses
so thats

16,900 for 2 clubs
or 8,450 a club

the Storm are at ova 10,500

whooo hoooo

The swans already have 24k members. Are you suggesting 10k are from interstate?

some reports have the gooses interstate membership as high as 50%
so

yes

yes I am

So the according to you the swans have 10-14k members but achieve crowds go 25-30k, yet the storm have almost 11k members but only get crowds of 14k.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

The swans already have 24k members. Are you suggesting 10k are from interstate?

some reports have the gooses interstate membership as high as 50%
so

yes

yes I am

So the according to you the swans have 10-14k members but achieve crowds go 25-30k, yet the storm have almost 11k members but only get crowds of 14k.

wot has the Storm got to do with the gooses ?

the Broncos has 16K members in 2011... yet averaged 33K
again marcus

you & the point

you're ships in the night .. just passing by each other