Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

What? You dope. I know the ratings! I know there are some RL games that rate more, and some AFL games that rate more.

I also know that overall the AFL GF beats RL the majority of the time in ratings and almost always in attendance.

No point for you dopey.

you said & I quote

the AFL GF OUTRATES ANY RL IN AUSTRALIA

I called BS

now its ..hmmmm
maybe not any .... sometimes ... every now & then



a point against you Xman
or are you the gutless .. gonadless .. shirt lifter we all knew you were ?



whopped weren't you ?

I said continually outrates, not every single time! I also said overall when you asked for clarification.

No point for you dopey. Learn the rules first. You challenge a BS file on the claim terms. These were the terms when you asked for a challenge.

I'd say you were the one who was whopped. The AFL GF claims the crowds and ratings victory more often than not. Exactly why I said "overall and continually"

Xman wrote:

I said continually outrates, not every single time! I also said overall when you asked for clarification.

No point for you dopey. Learn the rules first. You challenge a BS file on the claim terms. These were the terms when you asked for a challenge.

I'd say you were the one who was whopped. The AFL GF claims the crowds and ratings victory more often than not. Exactly why I said "overall and continually"

since when has ... continually .... not meant .... every single time

but if its not every single time... you said this anyway ........ but then back peddled ... distracted ... changed .. distorted ... moved the goal posts ... then moved them elsewhere .. then hid them ... like a gutless .. gonadless lady boy
if its not then how often is it ?

your disgraceful ... sordidly dishonourable behaviour in here today is amongst the lowest I have seen in here
& you call yourself a mod
you are a disgrace

Xman you actually said outrates AND outdraws. Just to emphasis Dave's idiotics.

Dave you wish "continually" meant every single time. Go back the school. It's means the majority of the time, not every time.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I said continually outrates, not every single time! I also said overall when you asked for clarification.

No point for you dopey. Learn the rules first. You challenge a BS file on the claim terms. These were the terms when you asked for a challenge.

I'd say you were the one who was whopped. The AFL GF claims the crowds and ratings victory more often than not. Exactly why I said "overall and continually"

since when has ... continually .... not meant .... every single time

but if its not every single time... you said this anyway ........ but then back peddled ... distracted ... changed .. distorted ... moved the goal posts ... then moved them elsewhere .. then hid them ... like a gutless .. gonadless lady boy
if its not then how often is it ?

your disgraceful ... sordidly dishonourable behaviour in here today is amongst the lowest I have seen in here
& you call yourself a mod
you are a disgrace

I can see you have NFI when it comes to the bs files.

I used the term continually meaning over and over, not every single time. The definition of continually on dictionary.com is: very often, at regular or frequent intervals. This is exactly how i meant it.

You then asked if I wanted to bet on it. I then clarified my meaning further bynusing the term overall in case you didn't get the context the first time.

You then called a bs challenge. It's on these terms the challenge is called, not some stupid notion you have.

Dumbass

Raiderdave wrote:

since when has ... continually .... not meant .... every single time

In the English language. e.g."He continually breaks the law" .

Your thinking of continuity or continuous, as in mathmatical speak and even so the period comes into play.
Continually winning can mean each year period , not every single occurance in between.

I've checked the Stats site at rleague.com and in the history of the NRL they've only broken 100,000 twice. In fact they've only beaten 90,000 four times. Including finals. The AFL/VFL have more than 20 crowds over 100,000 so goodness knows how many more there have been. During the home and away season alone they've beaten the 90,000 barrier 9 times.

I went through the SOO attendances at ANZ only, given that all the other venues had nowhere near the capacity and the record is 88,336. Only four other games broke the 80,000 barrier.

Still want to call BS, Dave?

NSWAFL wrote:

Xman you actually said outrates AND outdraws. Just to emphasis Dave's idiotics.

Dave you wish "continually" meant every single time. Go back the school. It's means the majority of the time, not every time.

does it do both peanut ?

no

so f.uck off outta this argument til your know what the hell yr talking about

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I said continually outrates, not every single time! I also said overall when you asked for clarification.

No point for you dopey. Learn the rules first. You challenge a BS file on the claim terms. These were the terms when you asked for a challenge.

I'd say you were the one who was whopped. The AFL GF claims the crowds and ratings victory more often than not. Exactly why I said "overall and continually"

since when has ... continually .... not meant .... every single time

but if its not every single time... you said this anyway ........ but then back peddled ... distracted ... changed .. distorted ... moved the goal posts ... then moved them elsewhere .. then hid them ... like a gutless .. gonadless lady boy
if its not then how often is it ?

your disgraceful ... sordidly dishonourable behaviour in here today is amongst the lowest I have seen in here
& you call yourself a mod
you are a disgrace

I can see you have NFI when it comes to the bs files.

I used the term continually meaning over and over, not every single time. The definition of continually on dictionary.com is: very often, at regular or frequent intervals. This is exactly how i meant it.

You then asked if I wanted to bet on it. I then clarified my meaning further bynusing the term overall in case you didn't get the context the first time.

You then called a bs challenge. It's on these terms the challenge is called, not some stupid notion you have.

Dumbass

You Said ANY .... thats what I challenged
then you changed tack quicker then usain bolt ova 100m you gutless sheila

does the flogabll GF outrate ANY RL in Aus or not ?...
its a pretty easy question
yes .. or no

beep beep beep

NSWAFL wrote:

I've checked the Stats site at rleague.com and in the history of the NRL they've only broken 100,000 twice. In fact they've only beaten 90,000 four times. Including finals. The AFL/VFL have more than 20 crowds over 100,000 so goodness knows how many more there have been. During the home and away season alone they've beaten the 90,000 barrier 9 times.

I went through the SOO attendances at ANZ only, given that all the other venues had nowhere near the capacity and the record is 88,336. Only four other games broke the 80,000 barrier.

Still want to call BS, Dave?

we play in a an 80K seat stadium nowdays wombat
thats as many as can attend our biggest game .... its impossible for it to be any bigger

again
bugger off til you have a valid point .... which will be your first

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

since when has ... continually .... not meant .... every single time

but if its not every single time... you said this anyway ........ but then back peddled ... distracted ... changed .. distorted ... moved the goal posts ... then moved them elsewhere .. then hid them ... like a gutless .. gonadless lady boy
if its not then how often is it ?

your disgraceful ... sordidly dishonourable behaviour in here today is amongst the lowest I have seen in here
& you call yourself a mod
you are a disgrace

I can see you have NFI when it comes to the bs files.

I used the term continually meaning over and over, not every single time. The definition of continually on dictionary.com is: very often, at regular or frequent intervals. This is exactly how i meant it.

You then asked if I wanted to bet on it. I then clarified my meaning further bynusing the term overall in case you didn't get the context the first time.

You then called a bs challenge. It's on these terms the challenge is called, not some stupid notion you have.

Dumbass

You Said ANY .... thats what I challenged
then you changed tack quicker then usain bolt ova 100m you gutless sheila

does the flogabll GF outrate ANY RL in Aus or not ?...
its a pretty easy question
yes .. or no

beep beep beep

Yep I said continually, overall and any RL game.

What this means oh simple one, is that for the majority of calender years (not every) the AFL GF beat any RL game (in that year) in crowds and ratings.

Got it yet???

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Xman you actually said outrates AND outdraws. Just to emphasis Dave's idiotics.

Dave you wish "continually" meant every single time. Go back the school. It's means the majority of the time, not every time.

does it do both peanut ?

no

so f.uck off outta this argument til your know what the hell yr talking about

I know what I'm talking about. You obviously don't. And your lack of venue to hold big crowds as an excuse just proves one thing. If the game was so popular, why haven't you got a stadium that can hold 100,000? You can pay for it right?

Wrong.

I'm in this argument because you are out to lunch and it needs to be emphasised for the world to see, Dave.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I can see you have NFI when it comes to the bs files.

I used the term continually meaning over and over, not every single time. The definition of continually on dictionary.com is: very often, at regular or frequent intervals. This is exactly how i meant it.

You then asked if I wanted to bet on it. I then clarified my meaning further bynusing the term overall in case you didn't get the context the first time.

You then called a bs challenge. It's on these terms the challenge is called, not some stupid notion you have.

Dumbass

You Said ANY .... thats what I challenged
then you changed tack quicker then usain bolt ova 100m you gutless sheila

does the flogabll GF outrate ANY RL in Aus or not ?...
its a pretty easy question
yes .. or no

beep beep beep

Yep I said continually, overall and any RL game.

What this means oh simple one, is that for the majority of calender years (not every) the AFL GF beat any RL game (in that year) in crowds and ratings.

Got it yet???

majority of calander years ..... F me

yes you were talking about 1962 ... obviously

beep beep beep

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Xman you actually said outrates AND outdraws. Just to emphasis Dave's idiotics.

Dave you wish "continually" meant every single time. Go back the school. It's means the majority of the time, not every time.

does it do both peanut ?

no

so f.uck off outta this argument til your know what the hell yr talking about

I know what I'm talking about. You obviously don't. And your lack of venue to hold big crowds as an excuse just proves one thing. If the game was so popular, why haven't you got a stadium that can hold 100,000? You can pay for it right?

Wrong.

I'm in this argument because you are out to lunch and it needs to be emphasised for the world to see, Dave.

a moronic argument .. from an utter moron

its the same as .... why didn't the AFL attract a crowd of 100K between 1987 & 2007
for 20 years it failed to

is that because its not popular enough ?

try another tack .. c.ockhead

Raiderdave wrote:

why didn't the AFL attract a crowd of 100K between 1987 & 2007

Because in normal configuration we don't quite have a 100k stadium.